All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is
available and ready for your testing and voting. This will be our
first release since returning to the Incubator. We look forward to
your input.
Release candidate artifacts:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote:
...Discussions from the [PROPOSAL] thread seem to have tapered off so I'd like
to call a vote on accepting MRUnit into the incubator. I'm re-pasting the
proposal for simplicity. We'll leave the vote open for 72 hours...
+1
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:39 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Would these projects please tidy up, following your graduation from
the Incubator.
abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima
For example many still have remains on the distribution mirrors.
As commented in the proposal thread I'm pretty dubious that incubation
is the best approach for this, so i vote 0.
The potential committers for MRUnit are MapReduce users and developers
so moving this away and having separate mailing lists means they'll
lose all sight of it. At the very least I
Oops, typo!
... and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Lucene.Net PMC
votes are cast.
should have been :
... and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Incubator PMC votes
are cast.
Thanks,
Troy
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I'm
On 2011-03-02, Troy Howard wrote:
PPMC Vote Thread:
http://bit.ly/eGcbYY
This vote contains my vote as a mentor of Lucene.NET, so there already
is one IPMC +1, but let me repeat it here to make tallying easier.
Please cast your votes!
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Lucene.Net
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote:
All:
Discussions from the [PROPOSAL] thread seem to have tapered off so I'd like
to call a vote on accepting MRUnit into the incubator. I'm re-pasting the
proposal for simplicity. We'll leave the vote open
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:39 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
For example many still have remains on the distribution mirrors.
We know that some projects have only recently graduated, so will
not yet have done a release as a TLP. Therefore your old release
needs to stay there
+1
Doug
On 03/01/2011 05:16 PM, Eric Sammer wrote:
All:
Discussions from the [PROPOSAL] thread seem to have tapered off so I'd like
to call a vote on accepting MRUnit into the incubator. I'm re-pasting the
proposal for simplicity. We'll leave the vote open for 72 hours.
Thanks!
=
Les Hazlewood wrote:
For Shiro (which is now a TLP), I just moved the artifacts out of
/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro and then deleted the shiro
directory.
Remember that stuff is automatically copied to archives:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro/
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
For Shiro (which is now a TLP), I just moved the artifacts out of
/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro and then deleted the shiro
directory.
Remember that stuff is automatically copied to archives:
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
links. I realize that archive.apache.org keeps a copy, but
On 3 March 2011 03:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
links. I realize that
Hi Sebb,
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
links. I realize that archive.apache.org keeps
I am just following current ASF practice.
I agree with the importance of preserving archives
and reliable links to past resources.
Please take this up with ASF Infrastructure.
This Incubator forum has too narrow scope.
By the way, unrelated to my orginal post,
ASF Infra is currently preparing
will do, I know Joe S. lurks here -- Joe -- do you get what I'm saying? Am I
crazy? (don't answer that) ^_^
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:08 PM, David Crossley wrote:
I am just following current ASF practice.
I agree with the importance of preserving archives
and reliable links to past resources.
17 matches
Mail list logo
