Re: Clarification/typo on release votes (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.3-incubating)

The third condition is implied by the second one. I do not believe the second condition is implied by "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there must be more positive than negative

Re: Clarification/typo on release votes (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.3-incubating)

Gah, this is what I was trying to convey. But I don't think it's still 100% correct. You need a minimum of 3 +1's Your net positive votes must be 3 (e.g. if you have a -1 and 5 total votes, the other 4 votes must be +1's) You need more +1's than -1's I'm not sure what is written better.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.3-incubating

Copying my +1 from the dev list. On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:11 PM Oliver B. Fischer wrote: > Dear all, > > The Apache Tamaya team would like to release version 0.3-incubating of > Apache Tamaya. > > The new release is a major milestone of the project with the following

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.3-incubating

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - disclaimer exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good (you may want to remove the “—“ line in NOTICE) - all source files have ASF headers - can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Yes, I tagged it as a RESULT sending it out thx Justin for pointing it out. debo On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:24 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > Perhaps I’m missing something but it looks like you intended to put this RC > [1] up for IPMC vote after passing a vote on the

[RESULT] [VOTE] Impala 2.9.0 release candidate 1

The release has passed. The vote is: +1 (binding): Justin Mclean John D. Ament Todd Lipcon

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.3-incubating

+1 (binding) You must update the KEYS file in dist/release/incubator/tamaya [1] before you release 0.3-incubating. It does not contain your signing key (only dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/KEYS does). * MD5 and SHA512 are good, sig is ok too * commit exists in SCM, please include the SHA1 in the

Clarification/typo on release votes (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.3-incubating)

On 6/15/17 1:11 PM, Oliver B. Fischer wrote: Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes and no -1’s (see [4]). Just wanted to point out that your description of majority approval is wrong. You need at least 3 +1's and more +1's than -1's. -1's are not

Re: Images in source code.

Can someone please log a JIRA case on RAT? As soon as this feature is in a released version of RAT I’ll change our release process to require headers in all images. Julian > On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Felix Meschberger > wrote: > > Here:

Re: Images in source code.

Here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ ? and http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html (Thanks Google ;-) ) Regards Felix Am 15.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Martin Gainty >: James and Team quick update I have

Re: Images in source code.

I was unsuccessful finding a tool as well. On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > James and Team > > > quick update I have factored rat-plugin to read XMP (an XML > metadata-tagged file with embedded Image) > > i have tried adding metadata tags using the

Re: Images in source code.

James and Team quick update I have factored rat-plugin to read XMP (an XML metadata-tagged file with embedded Image) i have tried adding metadata tags using the crippled freebie photoshop and could not find any way to add metadata tags to PNG, JPG or PSD as the File/FileInfo menu in freebie

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

Thanks for the clarification Bill! -Taylor > On Jun 15, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > > Hi Taylor, > > The Heron team engaged with members of the Apache Storm community through > private channels before the project was made available as open source. We >

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.9.0 release candidate 1

+1 (binding) - compiled on el6 - looked at diff from 2.8, looking for any bad license/copyright/etc which might be problematic, didnt see anything -Todd On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:29 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:23 PM Taras Bobrovytsky

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Bill Graham wrote: ... One of our goals during incubation will be to use open forums of > communication, like the Apache mailing lists, and work to foster a truly > collaborative environment for both Apache Storm and Heron community members

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

Thanks William! It will be great to work with you again. On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Supun Kamburugamuve wrote: > Thank you, William, for offering to help with the incubation process. It > will be really helpful. > > Supun.. > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:04 PM, William

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

Hi Taylor, The Heron team engaged with members of the Apache Storm community through private channels before the project was made available as open source. We recognize this is not the ideal approach and going forward we will use more collaborative methods as we progress and grow the Heron

[VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.3-incubating

Dear all, The Apache Tamaya team would like to release version 0.3-incubating of Apache Tamaya. The new release is a major milestone of the project with the following new key features: * Review & Verify OSGi Support * Remove dependency on DropWizard in favour of Tomcat Embedded

Re: [DRAFT] What the new Status Pages potentially look like

Thank you for the responses. >> 5. Make sure the Whimsy page applies to all projects. For instance, >> Impala releases are source tarballs, so if "Binary Distribution >> Licensing" means something about a non-source-tarball release >> artefact, it's not meaningful for Impala. >> > > Hmm that's

Re: [DRAFT] What the new Status Pages potentially look like

Jim, Thanks for the input! On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:22 PM Jim Apple wrote: > Here are some suggestions: > > 1. Only make this the reporting structure for new podlings. > Grandfather in old podlings to the old structure, since they may > already have workflows built

Re: [DRAFT] What the new Status Pages potentially look like

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Jim Apple wrote: > Here are some suggestions: > > 1. Only make this the reporting structure for new podlings. > Grandfather in old podlings to the old structure, since they may > already have workflows built around it. Impala does. We don't

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

Am happy to help too! Thx Debo Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2017, at 8:05 PM, William Markito Oliveira > wrote: > > Howdy! > > If Heron is looking for some help around incubation process, I'd love to > help while Geode experience is still fresh in my mind

Re: [DRAFT] What the new Status Pages potentially look like

Here are some suggestions: 1. Only make this the reporting structure for new podlings. Grandfather in old podlings to the old structure, since they may already have workflows built around it. Impala does. 2. Provide a clear description of the meaning and formatting of each field in comments on

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

Thank you, William, for offering to help with the incubation process. It will be really helpful. Supun.. On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:04 PM, William Markito Oliveira < william.mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > Howdy! > > If Heron is looking for some help around incubation process, I'd love to > help

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.1.0(incubating)(RC1)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Regards, yukon On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 2017, at 10:01 PM, dongeforever <1018815...@qq.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Incubator PMC, > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.1.0(incubating)(RC1)

> On Jun 13, 2017, at 10:01 PM, dongeforever <1018815...@qq.com> wrote: > > Hello Incubator PMC, > > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > +1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi, Perhaps I’m missing something but it looks like you intended to put this RC [1] up for IPMC vote after passing a vote on the PPMC dev list? If so can you please repost as a [VOTE] thread on the incubator general list. Thanks, Justin 1.

Policies with respect to slack/github

Hi, I'm a mentor of MXNet and one of the things I plan to address is how to integrate development via github and communication via slack with Apache's more established infrastructure (mailinglists + apache's git). Is there an official policy or recommendation of best practices on how to setup

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi, A vote can only pass with 3+1 votes, so I think you need one more vote to make a release here. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi all, After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.8.0-incubating passed with 2 binding +1s, 6 non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1. * Binding votes +1s: * Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh) Henry Saputra (hsaputra) * Non-binding votes +1s: * Gang (Gary) Wang