+1 - glad to see Druid finally (hopefully) landing here!
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen <
henn...@schmiedehausen.org> wrote:
> Woot!
>
> +1 for druid incubation.
>
> -h
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
+1 !
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Cool.
>
> +1
>
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> >
> > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache
> > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable,
+1 from me!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the
>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Benjamin Young
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'd very much like to un-log-jam the Annotator Proposal which I submitted
> back in late May-hence the new thread. ;)
>
> AFAIK, we only need one more Mentor to get things rolling. Two of our
> committers
And a belated +1, not that it needs the extra vote, but jclouds functions
great!
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not
Aurora is aimed at long-running stateless services (like app servers)?
-Brian
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.eduwrote:
Hi All,
We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Aurora, a
service scheduler used to schedule jobs onto Apache Mesos
* Matt Stephenson, Google
* Everett Toews, Rackspace
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation
=== Mentors ===
* Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation
* Tom White, Apache Software Foundation
* Henning Schmiedehausen, Apache Software
BrianMcCallister
Thanks!
-Brian
+1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.eduwrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating) version 0.10.0. This will be the second incubator release for
Mesos in Apache.
The candidate for Mesos 0.10.0-incubating release is
+1 swept for licensing and general organization of everything :-)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matei Zaharia ma...@eecs.berkeley.edu wrote:
+1
Tested it on Mac OS X, seems to work fine.
Matei
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following
I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there
something I missed?
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
The proposal looks fine, but the name collides with http://howl.ow2.org/
-Brian
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I would like to propose Howl as an Apache Incubator project. Howl is a
table and storage management service for data created using Apache
=
* Ali Ghodsi (UC Berkeley / Swedish Institute of Computer Science)
* Benjamin Hindman (UC Berkeley)
* Andy Konwinski (UC Berkeley)
* Matei Zaharia (UC Berkeley)
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
Tom White
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Dhruba Borthakur
* Brian McCallister
* Tom White
+1
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding )
sent from my Android phone
Am 06.05.2010 07:57 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com:
+1
--Gurkan
From: Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org
To:
+1 (slightly late, but I have a great excuse!)
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Good luck.
--kevan
On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
Greetings,
We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
Big +1
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks
FYI, the Shindig community has successfully voted for graduation [1].
If no objection on the charter or other, I will start a formal
acceptance vote soon.
Cheers,
Vincent
[1]
+1
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Good evening,
As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server to
the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion (thanks
Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my
What ever happened to Etch?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra== Issue
Tracking ==
* JIRA Cassandra
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
* Brian McCallister== Mentors ==
* Torsten Curdt* Brian McCallister
* Matthieu Riou
* Ian Holsman
== Sponsoring Entity ==
* Incubator
, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
I consider this to be a high-risk project, and agree with Martjin's
concerns, but do not consider this a bar to entering incubation. The
*reason* Cassandra wants to enter incubation is to address these
weaknesses.
+1
-Brian
On Tue
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see some plan on dealing with the fork/community stuff. We
*know* it is a problem, and I'd like to see how this is being
addressed in the proposal. In my opinion that is the crux to this
proposal.
I am expecting to be a mentor.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote:
If you need one more, you can count me in.
Cheers,
Matthieu
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
I'll be a mentor.
+1
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jan Lehnardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Incubator General List, dear IPMC,
thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your support.
On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC I
Sweet, I'll +1 it and probably use it :-)
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Darren Hague [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a secure and highly
scalable microsharing and micromessaging
Good catch, thank you!
I just added us to the third group (ie, the March group). We'll need to be
good incubatorlings and probably do our first three months of reporting a
bit late :-)
-Brian
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just trying to help with
FWIW, I quite like both git and mercurial, both give me a better workflow
than subversion for a lot of things I work on. Offline commits, local
branches, and sane merging are *huge*. The approach to distributed repos is
also very nice for folks who do want to maintain a fork elsewhere (forking
+1
On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages
of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we
proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors.
Now it is time to
+1
-Brian
On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
+1
-Yonik
+1 -- I am very excited to see this and think it will be good for CouchDB.
-Brian
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original source for this proposal can be found at
http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal
and a current
I've filed infra tickets for Shindig tuff to be set up :-)
On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
+1: 25
0: 1
-1: 0
Looks like it passed! Woo hoo!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig
+1: 25
0: 1
-1: 0
Looks like it passed! Woo hoo!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop
- Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:03:49 PM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop the container and backend
lists
A subversion repository
A JIRA issue tracker
= Initial Committers =
Andy Smith (Google)
Brian McCallister (Ning)
Brian Stoler(Google)
Cassie Doll (Google)
Dan Bentley (Google)
Dan Farino (MySpace)
David Glazer
+1 from me as well :-)
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop a container and backend
Wow, really happy at the positive response.
I'm on my way to ATL in the morning, and am halfway healthy again, so
will try to pull out some code during hackathon.
-Brian
On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop
On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
A big +1, and I'd happily be a mentor.
Thank you! We'll take you up on that :-)
-Brian
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
A subversion repository
A JIRA issue tracker
= Initial Committers =
Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Traverso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= Sponsors
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Can we see a code dump of the stuff you'll be donating?
As soon as possible :-) I am home with a nasty fever today so...
blech. We should have the ning-specific stuff gutted out by ApacheCon
at least!
-Brian
+1
-Brian
On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer community.
On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote:
Tomcat
-
We're open to suggestions regarding the order in which we add
bindings to
APIs, and doing such bindings isn't terribly hard. If Tomcat is
particularly critical as an early demonstration, we can add that to
the
+1 -- I'd offer to help as much as I can, but I know how little that
is right now :-(
Definitely support (and will probably use at least ;-)
-Brian
On Sep 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
+1
-Brian
On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately,
the
+1 Good folks, good community, good code!
-Brian
On May 8, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Dear Incubator,
The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
the attached draft board resolution.
I think wadi withdrew from incubation. It seems alive here: http://
wadi.codehaus.org/
?
-Brian
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I cross-referenced http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
against http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ and noticed that the
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-(
(Not trying to ditch OpenJPA, just trying to open up options :-)
-Brian
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-(
-Brian
On Apr 10, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I am informed that QPid has two Mentors. Would someone please
volunteer to
act as a third? QPid is an
On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
search for if applicable
Using the search available here ( http://www.uspto.gov/main/
trademarks.htm ) I found nothing which looks infringing. There are
a number of wombat trademarks around, but the only one related to
software
On Feb 14, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is a lazy-consensus approval vote.
Huh? These types of things should require activing
voting, not lazy-consensus. Otherwise the Incubator
is worthless.
I am just quoting from the IP Clearance docs:
Fourth paragraph (if you count the
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been recorded from each person who has
contributed code.
This is a lazy-consensus
+1 From me :-)
-Brian
On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been
+1 and about time :-)
-Brian
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:07 AM, Dave wrote:
OK, let's try this again.
The Roller community believes that Roller is ready for graduation, as
evidenced by this vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/
200702.mbox/browser
We would like to
+1
-Brian
On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
The Felix community feels that we are ready for graduation, as
indicated by the following community vote to request graduation:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-felix-dev/
200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We
Vote passes!
I'll forward the resolution to the board :-)
+1: [
Henri Yandell
Alex Karasulu
James Strachan
Davanum Srinivas
Paul Fremantle
Dain Sundstrom
Brian McCallister
Robert Burrell Donkin
David Blevins
Jason
Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED
+1
-Brian
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
ActiveMQ would like to move to graduate to a top level project, and
that the proposal at the end of this email be presented to the
board for consideration at the next meeting.
Status File: http://incubator.apache.org/projects
ActiveMQ
PMC:
Alan Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL
The Apache HTTPD project has decided (1) to import the wombat
codebase (2) and I have filled out all but one part of the ip
clearance form. The remaining part is the actual transfer of
copyright/assignment/etc. What form is correct for filling this out?
-Brian
1)
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 12/6/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I think Cliff voted for
this, so I suspect it is okay. Just want to make sure :-)
Nit:
I am unable to
+1 I have been watching the Cayenne goings-ons and am very impressed.
-Brian
On Dec 1, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the
Incubator as a TLP [1]. The text of the proposed board resolution
(adopted from iBatis
+1 though I'd consider making the configure script +x in the future.
-Brian
On Nov 14, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0
with a
total of 6 +1's.
The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:
+1
-Brian
On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne.
This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've
fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license
dependencies. Now we would
On Aug 25, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
What does it *do*?
I believe it is basically a big, pluggable, harness for analyzing and
annotating streams of arbitrary data, if this is the same thing I
talked with a bunch of folks about (including Martin, I believe) a
couple years ago
On Aug 25, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
(including Martin, I believe)
s/Martin/Marshall/g
Doh! Sorry :-)
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob Davies
+1 Guillaume Nodet
+1 Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Aaron Mulder
+1 Brian McCallister
We also had 1 non ppmc +1:
+1 Kevan Miller
Release tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC3/
maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
Releases section of the Incubation Policy
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:32 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On 8/16/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a committer votes all count style (really
AMQPD
-Brian
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
How about Qpid? It could mean Queuing Protocol for Information
Delivery or something like that.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
+1 for Kyma easy to say, read and use in code.
Archit Shah wrote:
More name ideas for Glasgow (and maybe
-1
I think that this project is premature until the spec is in an open,
inclusive process or at an acceptable standards body with compatible
licensing terms. I would embrace this project were it so.
The project is supposed to be implementations of a standard protocol
but the protocol in
On Aug 1, 2006, at 1:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
The current working group is open to new members and is eager for
feedback from anyone.
Where are the archives of the discussions that have gotten it this
far so I can understand what is driving the process and be able to
contribute? What
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Brian,
Just as in JCP, OASIS or W3C the real work happens on private
channels, that said we are in
the process of creating public pages, from which to link user and
feedback lists for anyone to
read, access and interact with the working
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Could you clarify whether you are asking if the Glasgow project could
continue in a different direction from the spec, or whether the spec,
itself, could be changed/forked and distributed by the ASF?
If something were to happen to cause
On Jul 29, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Does anyone have any further concerns about this proposal?
snip /
- There was also the question about how the AMQP specification will be
handled and licensed. I started this thread with my feelings about
that aspect (short version: it looks
+0 (I'd love to see it happen, but don't expect to be able to
contribute).
Nice folks, and anything with Upayavira, Sylvain, and Alex involved
is destined to conquer the world anyway :-)
-Brian
On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Upayavira wrote:
The Wicket developers
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:33 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Sahan,
Thank you for your interest, do you mind if we do a brief call
(or email...or discuss right here on the list -- whatever your
preference)
to
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
if blaze's goal is to create a standardized widely available and
interoperable messaging solution (you forgot enterprise class)
why is it creating a new one, and not using JMS ?
Blaze's goal (AMQP) is to provide multple
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
QA between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using
Just my 2 cents: I rather liked the name Heraldry as well -- thought
it was one of the more appropriate, and evocative, around =)
-Brian
On Jul 1, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/30/06, Matt Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth, I don't have an issue with
]
Vote result:
The VOTE has passed with 9 ppmc +1's and no -1s.
+1 Hiram Chirino
+1 Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Adrian Co
+1 Brian McCallister
+1 Jonas Lim
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 Fritz Oconer
+1 James Strachan
+1 Rob Davies
Release tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.1-RC1
On Jun 19, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
This proposal seeks to create a project within the Apache Software
Foundation to continue the development and advancement of Jini
technology. It has broad backing from the Jini Community, and
includes core developers from Sun Microsystems
+1
-Brian
On Jun 5, 2006, at 7:46 AM, James Strachan wrote:
We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to
address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just
like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro
to avoid confusion (as most
+1
-Brian
On May 26, 2006, at 5:11 AM, James Strachan wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
On May 9, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Coach Wei wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to look at this proposal? I realize there
have
been a few other threads on this list in the last week, but I'd really
be interested in getting any feedback.
Off topic of the proposal -- how is scripting a UI in XML
+1
-Brian
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
And continuning the discussion from the OpenJPA proposal thread, do
the other 27 - 15 = 12 people on the proposal get moved into
non-committer status?
Speaking as one of those twelve, I'd greatly appreciate not being
removed just because I am
On Mar 2, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to
DB, but is this consistent with the fact that we have no final
decision on how Cayenne will graduate from the incubator (as TLP or
DB subproject)?
You cannot actually do
On Feb 28, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
Though it wasn't posted to the PMC list (I only saw it because of
the announcement on the incubator list).
Erg, could have sworn I CC'ed the pmc list once discussions heated
up. My apologies!
-Brian
) would like to
join Apache. We wrote a proposal draft that can be viewed here:
http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/ASF+Proposal
Brian McCallister volunteered to help us as a mentor. And now we
need
a Sponsor. I understand that for TLP a sponsor must be either
Incubator PMC or the ASF
+1
-Brian
On Feb 17, 2006, at 10:09 AM, James Strachan wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
the 2nd candidate of the 4.0-M4 release.
We would now like to request the permission of the
+1
On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:06 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On the developer list the committers voted to create a milestone
release of ActiveMQ...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/
200512.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
then the committers voted to approve the distro
The DB PMC would like to ask that the Axion incubation resources be
removed and that Axion no longer be considered in incubation.
-Brian McCallister
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
On Jan 11, 2006, at 6:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
[ -1 ] - Any proposal should hit [EMAIL PROTECTED] first, No PR
before that.
[ -1 ] - Any PR should be vetted by PRC, No Excuses.
If this includes blogging about it (which recently was an issue) then
it won't work, regardless of what
+0 (would be +1 but I am trying not to +1 anything which I cannot
commit time to help with)
I will use it, though =)
-Brian
On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
+1 from me.
Yoav
On 1/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is as clear as day: +1.
Otis
I know of at least half a dozen private implementations of exactly
this. I definitely would like to see some common cause oon it.
Will read proposal in more detail tomorrow morning!
-Brian
On Jan 3, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a
Is it okay for the (incubating) jdo project to post snapshots to the
maven repository at ibiblio via the cvs.apache.org repo?
The only catch is figuring a good way to label it as in incubation.
One option is to include it the artifact id, so it would be something
like:
On Jul 26, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
So what happens now? :-)
Logistical details that come to mind are:
* adding Derby committers to the DB PMC - I assume a vote on who to
add
takes place on the DB PMC list, is this in progess?
yes.
Cannot comment on the rest =)
*
+1 (derby ppmc and db pmc hats on)
-Brian
On Jul 20, 2005, at 8:40 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Noel said that rather than hassling the Incubator PMC members for
release approval, we should just graduate!
So please vote on graduating Derby to a sub-project of Apache DB.
The developer
+1 (non-binding)
-Brian
On Jul 16, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Hello Incubator,
On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request
permission to post the files you can find here:
http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_10.1/
as an incubating release on the
Big +1 (non-binding)
-Brian
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
Submission date: 12 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @
RogueWave
dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com)
(0) rationale
The goal of the Apache C++
On Apr 22, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Pity my Derby internals proposal was rejected by Apachecon Europe :-)
Would you consider doing it as a BOF if you will be there? I would like
to attend it!
-Brian
-
To
3, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
At least one person from the DB PMC has voted in favour of graduation,
which I hope means that the project understands the issues of
assuming oversight and feels comfortable doing so. Having
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo