I also have a full backup, in case one of your templates was lost, for
some reason. Even if it wasn't, there are UI changes in this rather
large upgrade of Confluence so you'll probably need tweaking
regardless.
Don
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Richard Hirschhirsch.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Looked at the test site
(http://confluence-test.zones.apache.org:8080/display/ESME/Index) and
the tabs are working there. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the
exported site to see if the tabs are working there.
The
+1
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Nicholas L Gallardo nlgal...@us.ibm.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Bryant Luk
+1
On 5/25/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 00:46, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
[x] +1 Recommend to the board to establish Apache Wicket (binding)
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here;
willing to write whatever docs or build whatever
team size infrastructure feels necessary to ensure Confluence is
well-supported.
Don
On 11/9/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Don Brown wrote:
What exactly makes something a part of the official ASF
:
On Thursday 19 October 2006 02:14, Don Brown wrote:
I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate.
Can you please be more specific. Which requirements have been mad up on the
spot just for Harmony?
Either this is a case of FUD or more
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate. If we are to
require a project to go through an Incubation process, that process
should be well-defined and not constantly changing based on the whims
of Incubation members. That
On 9/28/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I took the liberty of looking at the Struts 2 release, and they don't
have license headers in the aforementioned files.
That's a Bad Thing(tm).
Tattletale! :)
Don
LSD
+1
On 8/24/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, please cast your votes:
[X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason
This has my hearty +1! This is great news as I've always admired the
framework and the community behind it, and this will further
facilitate the inter-framework discussions we (Struts) has been
periodically having with Wicket.
Let me know of any way I can help,
Don
On 7/26/06, Upayavira
The vote to graduate the WebWork 2 Podling to Struts PMC has passed.
The following Incubator PMC members have voted:
Don Brown +1
Ted Husted +1
Martin Cooper +1
Noel Bergman +1
Jim Jagielski +1
Therefore, I will begin the graduation tasks as described in the
policy document.
Initial Struts
I'd like to get the WebWork 2 podling out of incubation and into Struts, but
I have some questions to help determine if the requirements have been met.
1. Does all Java code have to use the ASF copyright header? We have some
files that have a NanoContainer Organization copyright, with an
On 4/19/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously not an open source license (eg strange limitations on
redistribution, no license to create derivative works, bla bla). We
obviously want to share this code with others under the terms of an open
source license. So you should
That is my understanding, yes. Simply a misconfiguration of IDEA.
Don
On 4/5/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don,
To be clear, are you indicating that the copyright notice is simply
entirely
false, the notice was erroneously placed, and that the named entity has no
copyright
In the WebWork2 podling, we have several files that contain a copyright
header naming the file as belonging to the ePlus corporation. Turns out,
this copyright was mistakenly applied due a developer's mistaken IDEA
configuration, which was set to add that copyright to every new file. That
easy way.
For example there's this account request from Don Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from today - it's not easily possible to find out
if he is supposed to be in charge of that - there's nothing on the PMC
list and there's just one vote thread covering the proposal on the
public list, nothing else
To explain further, WebWork will form the core of Struts Action 2. We
decided to go the Incubator route for two reasons:
1. The code has minor LGPL deps that we'll need to clean
2. We want to bring in a number of new developers
Since this project is central to the future of Struts (Struts
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:18, Don Brown wrote:
= RESOURCES TO BE CREATED =
* None. (Struts Action SVN module and build systems already exist.)
Resources are indeed needed, as the incubatee will not be homed in the target
PMC until after graduation.
True, I
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Howdy,
I like this as both a WebWork user and with my Apache hat on.
WebWork 2 will form the base of Struts Action 2.0 and is under heavy
active development.
Just out of curiosity, how soon are you hoping to make a release out
of the incubator?
We'd like to get an alpha
, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:18:04PM -0800, Don Brown wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WebWork2Proposal
snip/
- LSD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
=
* None. (Struts Action SVN module and build systems already exist.)
= INITIAL COMMITTERS =
* Jason Carreira (jcarreira at apache.org)
* Don Brown (mrdon at apache.org)
* Rene Gielen
* Rainer Hermanns
* Ted Husted (husted at apache.org)
* Toby Jee
* Patrick Lightbody (plightbo at apache.org
I forgot to include the Struts Sponsor results...
Binding PMC votes:
- Don Brown +1
- Martin Cooper +1
- Ted Husted +1
- Craig McClanahan +1
- Wendy Smoak +1
- Joe Germuska +1
- James Mitchell +1
- Niall Perberton +1
- James Holmes +1
- Hubert Rabago +1
Non-binding:
- Gary VanMatre
22 matches
Mail list logo
