[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17172716#comment-17172716 ] Henri Yandell commented on INCUBATOR-253: - Noting that the DJL project have updated

[LAZY] Letting anyone invite on Slack

Currently only 'admins' can invite people to the ASF Slack: https://the-asf.slack.com/ If we view it as an IRC equivalent, having to invite people at all is weird. We can, via a checkbox, change it so anyone on the ASF Slack (except 'guests') can invite someone to the Slack workspace:

Re: Planning to remove rosters from active podlings

Cool - I was asked why the info was in the podling pages the other day and all I had was "history/legacy" as an answer. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 13:33 John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > This coming weekend (9/29) I plan to remove the roster sections from all > podling status

Discussion Forums?

The MXNet community have been discussing the possibilities of a discussion forum. I suspect I'm out of date on the topic. Has there been Incubator discussion on forums in the past few years? Are there projects running forums? Discourse seems to be the current fashion. My dated assumption is that

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

+1 (binding) to the release. Minor items (fix next release): * R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside of Apache). * Agreed with Justin that there needs to be a Getting Started text file of

Re: Source Headers [Was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:37 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:10 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Just to be clear. The issue in this case (not to confuse this > situation > > > with MADlib's) isn't what license

Source Headers [Was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

how this has > been handled in the past). > > Please create JIRAs to track these. > > John > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all > > contributors

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

arance. > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator > who are not now committers? > > Regards, > > Craig > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <bay.

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. Will review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar. There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D.

Two more additions to Jenkins

Hi Incubator folk with Chair permissions, Could someone add cjolivier01 (Chris) and skm (Sandeep) to Jenkins for MXNet please? Thanks, Hen

Re: Two additions to Jenkins

Thank you John :) On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Both have been added. > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:44 AM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi PMC-Chair type folk on general@incubator. > > > &

Two additions to Jenkins

Hi PMC-Chair type folk on general@incubator. Could someone add Naveen Swamy (nswamy@) and Mu Li (muli@) to the Jenkins ldap group please. Thank you, Hen

ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache MXNet is removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies. ZeroMQ is licensed under the LGPL 3.0 with an exception for static compiling. They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but haven't made much progress,

Re: Granting access to Jenkins

Thank you :) On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:10 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Andy. I was just about to see if my karma now kicked in. > > John > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 AM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Done > >

Granting access to Jenkins

Could a PMC Chair type person grant access to Jenkins for Ly please (login lxn2)? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount I gave it a shot, but I don't believe I have the correct permissions. Thank you, Hen

private list subscriptions

Dumb question time. Should we encourage that @apache.org addresses are used when subscribing to a private PMC list; and if not all PMC members have subscribed on a podling, can one subscribe their @apache.org addresses for them? Or should we mandate that @apache are used? Does anything

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache SystemML podling graduation

+1. Sounds like it's passed time to discuss graduation. There's no such thing as a perfect release, and the measure of a community is not its ability to make a perfect release, but its ability to deal with, and learn from, a release issue. Hen On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:04 Luciano Resende

Re: Adding committers to a PPMC

at 4:14 AM, Craig Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Hen, > > At the bottom of the PPMC list is a big bold “+”. If you click on that, > you can add apache ids to the PPMC. > > HTH, > > Craig > > > On Feb 20, 2017, at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell <bay

Adding committers to a PPMC

When I look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mxnet - I only see the mentors for the project listed on the PPMC. Any idea what I need to modify to add the original committers from the proposal to the PPMC? Or do the mentors have to bootstrap and vote them all on? Thanks, Hen

Adding ozawa to incubator karma

Hi Ted, Could you add ozawa@ to the Incubator LDAP? He is on the MXNet project but as he already had an Apache account he's not been granted karma as a part of setup. Thanks, Hen

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

irst line. Raising a PR is the only option. > Let me see what infra guys say. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:25 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Even with that, I've found the process to edit the git file to be pain. > > > > I sent a pull request in

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

maintained in git and mirrored to SVN) > > I'll commit this. > > John > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:35 AM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Answering myself, it went to git. > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=infrastructure

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

Answering myself, it went to git. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=infrastructure-puppet.git;a=blob;f=modules/subversion_server/files/authorization/asf-authorization-template Hen On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > This looks ou

Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

This looks out of date: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#who-auth-karma It says: Incubator Access Authorization Special karma is required to authorize incubator access for committers. This karma is limited to: - PMC Chairs (past and present) - Selected people in the

Re: [RESULT] MXNet to enter the Incubator

ent/projects/mxnet.xml for the project (infra requires both to get > started). > > John > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:16 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Heh - I was assuming Champion automatically became Mentor. Any issue if > I > > do that, or

Re: [RESULT] MXNet to enter the Incubator

more > to worry about for MXNet. > > I've contemplated (and still do) pulling out podling bootstrap from the > mentor guide. Right now it makes sense since mentors are responsible for > coordinating w/ INFRA and doing self-serve stuff. > > John > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at

Re: [RESULT] MXNet to enter the Incubator

n D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Henri, > > Compare the list of steps you're planning to take vs > http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-podling > > John > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:20 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > >

[RESULT] MXNet to enter the Incubator

Vote is closed and successful. 7 binding +1 votes. Henry Saputra (hsaputra) Sebastian Schelter (ssc) Markus Weimer (weimer) Stian Soiland-Reyes(stain) Suneel Marthi (smarthi) Jean-Baptiste Onofré (jbonofre) Henri Yandell (bayard) 7 community +1 votes. Charith Elvitigala

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

Thank you everyone for your votes. I'm calling the vote closed and will send out a RESULT mail momentarily. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Incubator folk, > >I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for i

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

The vote has started, so the proposal text is frozen. Assuming the vote is successful, adding more folk can be an early order of business for the newly created PPMC :) Thanks, Hen On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:27 PM, tornadomeet wuwei wrote: > hello, > > Please sign me

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Hub ID is: lryta > Affiliation: University of Michigan. > > Best, > Larry > > On 2017-01-06 00:12 (-0500), Henri Yandell <b...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello Incubator,> > > > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling.> > > > &

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

University) - Yuan Tang (Uptake) - Nan Zhu (Microsoft/Apache) - Felix Cheung (Microsoft/Apache) - Sandeep Krishnamurthy (AWS) Sponsors Champion Henri Yandell (bayard at apache.org) Nominated Mentors - Sebastian Schelter (ssc at apache.org) - Suneel Marthi (smarthi at

[VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

Hi Incubator folk, I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at this wiki link: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MXNetProposal?action=recall=19 I will reply to this email with a copy of the proposal. MXNet

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

a committer of MxNet. > > GitHub ID: Ldpe2G > Email: liangdep...@gmail.com > Affiliations: Sun Yat-sen University > > 2017-01-14 13:49 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>: > > > Thanks for all the feedback and interested parties :) > > > > My aim is to p

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Added :) On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:37 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy < sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Please sign me up as a committer of MxNet > > Github ID: sandeep-krishnamurthy > Email: sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com > Affiliations: AWS > > Best, > Sandeep Krishnamurthy > >

Re: IP Clearance terms

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:46 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > - Its not usual for a podling to receive a subsequent donation. > Doesn't the IP Clearance also cover the initial codebase review? Or is there a very similar page that's covering that? > - I hate that the IPMC

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Thanks for all the feedback and interested parties :) My aim is to propose a vote on Monday, unless someone raises an issue before then. Hen On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello Incubator, > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Added :) On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Zhang Jian <zhang.jian@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Please sign me up as a committer of MxNet > > Github ID: jzhang-zju > Email: zhang.jian@gmail.com > Affiliations: Horizon Robotics > > Best, > Jian > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

t; Email: yifeng.g...@hobot.cc > Affiliations: horizon robotics > > Best, > Yifeng > > On 2017-01-13 00:54 (+0800), Henri Yandell <b...@apache.org> wrote: > > Added :)> > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:37 AM, Terry Chen <ja...@gmail.com> wr

Re: HTTPS project sites

We're not doing SSL-everywhere afaict; so seems that we would want to keep the HTTP option when in HTTP. Would love to see Infra providing a 'how many hardcoded http/https' report for each subdomain :) Hen On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Christopher wrote: > In most

Re: IP Clearance terms

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:52 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:06 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > IMHO, IP Clearance in of itself is confusing. For software being > > relicensed (under an SGA) it shouldn't be needed. > > Well,

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

gt; > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello Incubator, > > > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. > > > > The existing MXNet project (http://mxnet.io - 1.5 years old, 15 > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Added :) On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:37 AM, Terry Chen wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to be committer of MxNet > > Github ID: terrychenism > Email: terrychen2...@live.com > Affiliations: Novumind > > > Best, > Terry > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:43 PM, 项亮 <xlvec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would like to volunteer as a committer for MXNet > > > > github id: xlvector > > email: xlvec...@gmail.com > > > > Liang Xiang from Toutiao Lab > > > > On 2017-01-06 13:12 (+0800), H

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Added :) On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:43 PM, 项亮 <xlvec...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to volunteer as a committer for MXNet > > github id: xlvector > email: xlvec...@gmail.com > > Liang Xiang from Toutiao Lab > > On 2017-01-06 13:12 (+0800), Henri Yandell <ba

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

n Xie, and would like to contribute > more on this direction. > > GitHub ID: zihaolucky > Email: zihaolu...@gmail.com <mailto:zihaolu...@gmail.com> > Company: Alibaba Group > > Thank you! > > > On 2017-01-06 13:12 (+0800), Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Thanks Ziheng :) I've added you to the page. Hen On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:35 PM, ziheng wrote: > Hello > > Please sign me up as a committer for MXNet - I've been working on MXNet > Profiler and NNVM-Fusion, also will work with Mu as an intern at Amazon AWS > team in the

IP Clearance terms

It was pointed out on legal-discuss@ that the IP Clearance terms in http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html are odd. Namely the two items: --- * Check and make sure that for all items included with the distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have

Re: Committer for MXNet.

Added (after confirming offline with Chris that his affiliation is AWS). On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Chris Olivier wrote: > I would like to volunteer as a committer for MXNet. > > -Chris Olivier > cjolivie...@gmail.com > >

Re: Committer for MXNet.

Thanks :) https://www.linkedin.com/in/chris-olivier-81953223 I presume? Part of the proposal is to identify folks' affiliations so any dependence on a single paying employer is clear. On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Chris Olivier wrote: > I would like to volunteer as a

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

> > On 2017-01-05 21:12 (-0800), Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello Incubator, > > > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. > > > > The existing MXNet project (http://mxnet.io - 1.5 years old, 15 > committe

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

my* > > > Thanks, Naveen > > > > On 2017-01-05 21:12 (-0800), Henri Yandell <b...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello Incubator,> > > > > > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling.> > > > > > > The existing MXNet

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Thanks Joe - I've added you to the commiter list :) On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Joe Spisak wrote: > Awesome! Please sign me up as a committer - I've been working with Mu on > MXNet (Amazon) and would love to get more involved with project! > > GitHub ID: jspisak > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Thanks Markus - I've added you to the proposal :) On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Markus Weimer <mar...@weimo.de> wrote: > On 2017-01-05 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. >> > > Awesome! If you still need

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

t; tracking issues and bugs? > I suppose this needs a nod by Greg Stein as rep from Apache Infra to > confirm that this is ok for incubation and how would it impact during > graduation. > > - Henry > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> w

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:52 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > There seem to be some discrepancies in the proposal vs what they currently > have. That and some comments in line. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:12 AM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Brilliant - thank you Suneel :) I see you're on the Incubator PMC and have added you to the wiki page. On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > I would like to sign up as mentor for MxNet. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Henri Yandell <

[DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

(Mediav) * Tong He (Simon Fraser University) * Qiang Kou (Indiana U) * Xingjian Shi (HKUST) == Sponsors == === Champion === Henri Yandell (bayard at apache.org) === Nominated Mentors === Sebastian Schelter (s...@apache.org) === Sponsoring Entity === We are requesting the Incubator

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Right now, Apache's rules are so complex that we are all in perpetual > violation. You can't even know what all the rules are! > First, your podling was not part of our charter nor our licensing agreement so I

Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > I suspect 'relevant' means those parts of a NOTICE relating to the parts > of > > the product you use

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

> > > > @john The 0mq ecosystem is made up of many projects of different sizes > and maturity. > > In the case of JeroMQ, the committers are showing an overwhelming > momentum to transition to > > MPL. I don't see any reason for us to consider any other alternativ

Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

I suspect 'relevant' means those parts of a NOTICE relating to the parts of the product you use. In this case you'd include the whole file (ie +1 to Marvin). I suspect 'relevant' needs clarification in the docs. Hen On Friday, March 18, 2016, Stephen Mallette wrote: >

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

So you include it in conversations - there would also need to be discussions on the Glassfish trademark/any domains. Nothing as standardized as the software license grant others have referred to, but I would expect it to be 'if a registered trademark/domain, transferring to ASF; if not a

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

Having chatted around the 0mq community in the past; I've confidence in their desire to move to MPL; and 26/32 committers is a great step forward. You raise a good reservation though John - if you remove the blocker on the usage side, it's easy for the licensing to remain as is. I'm +1 for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (should be binding by vote end :) ). On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the

Re: Trouble building the incbuator website [ERR 0194]

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Katherine Marsden > wrote: > > On 2/29/2016 5:10 PM, Katherine Marsden wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am having trouble building the incubator website. I

Re: Copyright sign offs

; that > > the PPMC was rather small. I have no idea what its current membership > is. > > > > There has been recent maintenance on the source code, some working > against > > JIRA issues, as reported in the February 2016 Incubator Report. > > > > - D

Copyright sign offs

Haven't done this in a while :) Thought I'd share that the following podlings have not yet signed off on their Copyright sections in their status reports. I mention this because I believe it's one of the first elements that should be signed off on the status report and it's a worry if projects

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

Thought I'd share a report I generated from some code of mine on the gearpump GitHub org (attached - though mail server may block). The highlights are: * 9 repos. * High number of pull requests resolved (1026/1030). * Fairly high number of issues resolved (853/951). * Pull requests are resolved

Re: Single person developed project

Note that http://labs.apache.org/ may be what you're looking for if this is your own project. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu < amareshw...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Wanted to know if a single person developed project can get incubated in > Apache. Any doc links

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

I'm more likely to guide contributions from my employer. There's been some contributions thus far, and there is interest to put more dayjob time into contributing, but currently there's no coder who personally is committed to the project. Hen On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Mattmann, Chris A

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

+1 (non-binding). On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Luke Han wrote: > +1 non-binding > > > Best Regards! > - > > Luke Han > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:27 AM, Tom Barber > wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > Should be a very

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > All of this can be worked during Incubation and I think we have > the right folks here who can help to get it set up. > Yup - my question was well answered; thanks all :) Hen

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

'TM'? On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:42 PM, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 20/01/2016 03:38, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > License-wise, any expectation of problems from the GPL and LGPL depend > encies?

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

++++++++ > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> > Date: Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:57 PM > To

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

Non-binding +1 to Joshua joining the Incubator. I'd be interested in mentoring. > -Original Message- > From: jpluser > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 10:56 PM > To:

Re: ODF Toolkit may need help

I don't see any project within the Attic that came there from the Incubator. If one did, it should have passed its IP items already. My opinion on domain names for a project not graduating is that we give it back to who gave it to us, or if they don't want it back, let them decide who we should

Re: A request/suggestion for shepherds: be firm about IP clearance

I'm hoping we can reach a point where every project older than 6 months has done IP clearance; then as each project reaches 6 months it either signs off on IP or is terminated. Hen On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: After my recent adventure sorting

Re: Amber CLA status [Was: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence]

miss something? Should we do something more or we can assume this legal issue is over? Thanks and regards Antonio On Aug 12, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: Hi Antonio, This is about making sure that all software being contributed to Apache is covered by CLAs (continuous

Re: Amber CLA status [Was: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence]

will do as you suggested. Do you thing we are missing anything else legally wise? Regards Antonio On Aug 23, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: Sounds like you should sign off on the first item in the Copyright section of http://incubator.apache.org/projects/amber.html as n

Re: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence

wrote: Henri, Ant pointed out that Kato released. Where is the signoff you are looking at? --benson On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell

Re: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, Benson Margulies wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.comjavascript:; wrote: Just because it was released doesn't mean that it correctly did

Amber CLA status [Was: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence]

tick the box. Regards Antonio [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-134 On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item: 2009-02-09 kato 2009-02-13 stonehenge 2009-05-13 socialsite 2010-05-19

Re: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item: 2009-02-09 kato 2009-02-13 stonehenge 2009-05-13 socialsite 2010-05-19 amber 2010

Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence

The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item: 2009-02-09 kato 2009-02-13 stonehenge 2009-05-13 socialsite 2010-05-19 amber 2010-09-05 nuvem 2010-11-12 kitty 2010-11-24 stanbol 2011-06-13 openofficeorg Said checklist item is: Check and make sure that the

Re: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence

Updating status. On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item: 2009-02-09 kato Retiring. Source needs deleting(?). 2009-02-13 stonehenge Retired. Source needs deleting(?). 2009-05-13

Re: [SITE] Link to board meeting minutes for podling acceptance/graduation

Useful, but a difficult workflow (assuming the minutes still lag the meetings by a long way - seems true as the last 3 meetings aren't on the site yet). Conjecture, but I would guess that the project finish graduation before the minutes are published. This means that the Podling members are no

Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe I've had been using a high bar with the podlings I mentor/participate. I'll look into graduating couple podlings after I come back from Thanks Giving : Apache PhotArk, Apache Wink. First things first - can you

Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own.  As David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the

Re: Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: snip 2009-02-09  kato I'm

Re: Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

the amount of his contribution was very small. Is there anything else what we need to do to get the copyright item signed off? Thanks, Jörn On 11/11/11 1:14 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: Updating this, half of the items without sign-off in July are now signed off. I've updated the list below

Re: Adobe revises Flex's future ... at the Apache Software Foundation - The H Open Source: News and Features

Looking forward to hearing how this isn't a code dump :) Hen On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: Heads up on some incoming proposals. http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Adobe-revises-Flex-s-future-at-the-Apache-Software-Foundation-1380242.html NOTE: and

[RESULT] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]

5 +1s to retire Olio. Happily the IP did get signed off on, so no need to remove the source code from SVN. I'll go ahead and update the Incubator site to indicate that the project is now retired. Hen On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: Coming back

Re: Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/11/11 Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com Updating this, half of the items without sign-off in July are now signed off. I've updated the list below (though I've not yet added new PMCs since June). Here's

Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]

-microsystems-olio.pdf ) but the checkbox wasn't checked in the podling status. Making it read only would be the proper course of action. Craig On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: Coming back to this. It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation

Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

Updating this, half of the items without sign-off in July are now signed off. I've updated the list below (though I've not yet added new PMCs since June). Here's the previous email: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a list of the projects

[VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]

Coming back to this. It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation that Olio will graduate. So, voting: [ ] +1 [ ] -1, no because... Hen On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote

Re: svn commit: r1163489 - in /incubator/public/trunk: clutch.pkl site-author/clutch.txt site-author/clutch.xml site-author/report_due_1.txt site-publish/clutch.html site-publish/clutch.txt site-publi

Thanks. I was assuming it was related to the removing it from the navbar. Hen On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 August 2011 15:33, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 August 2011 06:39,  bay...@apache.org wrote: Author: bayard Date: Wed Aug 31 05:39:59 2011

Re: Websites of retired podlings (was Re: Retired podlings with RW SVN access)

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 05:25:00PM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:59:33PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Gavin McDonald wrote on Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 16:35:47 +1000: The retirement

  1   2   3   4   >