Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc5 (respin)

With the fixed Checksums, +1 (binding). — Leif > On May 2, 2020, at 12:23, Otto van der Schaaf wrote: > > Thanks! I backed out the md5 hashes in favor of sha512 ones. > > Op za 2 mei 2020 om 07:47 schreef Justin Mclean : >> >> Hi, >> >> -1 (binding) but +1 (binding) as soon as you fix the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc4

+1 (binding) — Leif > On Feb 10, 2020, at 2:31 PM, Otto van der Schaaf wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache PageSpeed (Incubating) version > 1.14.36.1. > > The Apache PageSpeed community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release > Apache PageSpeed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Traffic Control to a top level project

;>> building, monitoring, configuring, and provisioning a large scale >>>> content delivery network (CDN).; and be it further >>>> >>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Traffic Control" be >>>> and hereby is crea

Re: [VOTE] Retire iota

+1 (binding) — Leif > On Feb 4, 2018, at 3:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Iota podling. > > The podling has discussed retirement [1], has not made a single release and > there's been little activity on it’s

Re: [VOTE] Accept Coral into the Apache Incubator

+1(binding) — Leif > On Feb 1, 2018, at 07:07, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to start a VOTE to propose the Coral project as a podling into > the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at https://www.apache.org/foundation/ >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Did we rule out Onyx for sure? Just because some other project might use it on say github doesn’t necessarily exclude us from having an Apache Onyx? FWIW, I agree that surf is too similar in pronunciation to Apache serf. :) Cheers, — Leif > On Jan 27, 2018, at 07:31, Dave Fisher

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC3

+1 (binding). Tested the build, RPMs successfully built, and double checked the RAT report. Cheers — Leif > On Jan 10, 2018, at 18:04, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - hashes and signatures good > -

Wiki edit access

I had to create a new account on the Incubator Wiki, can I please get access for LeifHedstrom / zw...@apache.org to edit ? Thanks! — Leif

Re: [VOTE] Accept PageSpeed into the Apache Incubator

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 15:43, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > +1 from me. (binding) > > Thanks and good luck. > > Chris > > > > > On 9/27/17, 12:04 PM, "Otto van der Schaaf" wrote: > >Hi All, > >I would like to start a VOTE to bring the

Re: [PROPOSAL] PageSpeed

> On Sep 20, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Otto van der Schaaf wrote: > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > We are excited to share our proposal for discussion and feedback for > entering Apache Incubation. > PageSpeed represents a series of open source technologies to help make the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Bryan Call wrote: > > Having a lot of Yahoo employees on the Traffic Server Proposal back in 2009 > was also a concern. This is something we were able to easily overcome in > incubation. Building a healthy diverse community is one of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

> On Feb 21, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > > Hello Incubator PMC, > +1 (binding) — Leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

> On Nov 10, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not accept

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:43 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2016 18:15, "Leif Hedstrom" <zw...@apache.org > <mailto:zw...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:10 PM, John D. Ament <jo

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:10 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:09 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >>> On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Jan van Doorn <j...@knutsel.com> wrote: >>> >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > The results are in and voting is now closed. The votes: > > [7] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator Great! Incubator PMC: As the sponsor of this Podling, we would like to request that you officially

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 1, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 1, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

> On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Thanks Leif. > > I’m going to go check them out, but I wonder why it was discussed > on private? Likely my mistake, I just let it auto-complete the address. — Leif

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

> On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hmm, I missed the convo on infrastructure@. > > Do you have a pointer to it? It was on infrastructure-private@. Cheers, — leif

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

> On Jun 17, 2016, at 4:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Leif, > > I doubt this is something IPMC can help you with. As champion, I would > recommend that you reach out to infra to see the appetite to support > git-dual on a podling. You will want to explain the

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

> On Jun 16, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Sounds cool! > > Git-dual is not a broad option right now unfortunately so that will need to > be updated to git-wp. > It this a hard rule? Would infra or the incubator PMC be able to make

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

> On May 23, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. +1 (binding). — leif

Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

On Oct 16, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45241.html I would like to call a Vote for accepting Taverna as a new incubator project. The proposal is

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

On Jan 31, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to

Re: [VOTE] Phoenix for incubator project

On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated. Let us now move to a vote. Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project? [] +1 Accept Phoenix into

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote: Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now seemingly resolved. I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. The proposal is included below and is also at:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -- leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally named Ivory)

On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: [ ] +1 Accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator because... +1. Binding. -- Leif - To

Re: [VOTE] Recommend to the Board to establish the Apache OpenOffice Project

On 10/10/12 1:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Seeing no objections to my last message, and keeping into account that this list had been regularly informed about the steps Apache OpenOffice was taking towards graduation, I'm hereby asking the IPMC to recommend the following resolution to the

Re: [VOTE] Ripple Emulator to be admitted to the incubator

On 10/11/12 10:04 AM, Gord Tanner wrote: Please cast your votes! [ ] +1, recommend Ripple to move into the incubator [ ] +0, abstain/don't care [ ] -1, do not recommend Ripple to move into the incubator,because... +1 (binding) -- leif

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bigtop for incubation

On 06/17/2011 11:15 AM, Tom White wrote: The discussion thread is available at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktimriyvs5g5maklqvinauz9h6s5...@mail.gmail.com%3E Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept Bigtop for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

+1 (binding) Cheers! -- Leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Apache OpenOffice.org Incubator Proposal: Collaboration with TDF/LO

On 06/03/2011 12:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 14:50,robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote on 06/03/2011 02:27:55 PM: Your proposed text does not cover the fact that TDF/LO can lift code from ASF into their products. This is true, but would you

Re: [Vote]: Libcloud to become a TLP

+1 (non-binding). Well done! -- leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Howl as an Incubator Project

+1 (non-binding) -- leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation

On 01/26/2011 11:05 PM, Troy Howard wrote: All, Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan 12th, we now have three mentors signed up and would like to call a vote to accept Lucene.Net into the Apache Incubator. +1 (not binding) -- leif

Re: [VOTE] Mesos to enter the incubator

On Dec 18, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Matei Zaharia ma...@apache.org wrote: We've finalized our proposal for Mesos (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MesosProposal) and we'd now like to put it up for vote. +1 (non-binding). -- Leif

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote: Disclaimer: The private mailing list will rarely be used (typically for discussing security issues and approving new committers) and access is only approved for committers. Access to the private list is restricted to the

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either ICLA or CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the new committers guide: http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html. I'm fairly certain all committers needs to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

+1 (non-binding) Cheers, -- leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

On Nov 26, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote: I wouldn't stop the proposal, though. This can be identified as an issue to be solved in Incubation - either by changing the name away from 'Wave' or by transferring marks or even by determining that none

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

On 11/23/2010 04:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: Hello all, We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator. Did Google have any trademarks on Wave and are they allowing them to be transferred to the ASF? Certainly looks like they

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.0

On 10/06/2010 02:36 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.4.0 are available at: http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/libcloud-0.4.0/ Please test and place your votes please; +/- 1 [ ] Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.0 I've checked the sigs, built, and ran the

Re: Real-time communication (was [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator)

On 09/17/2010 08:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: +1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable when plenty of running projects have them. +1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very active community in the IRC room, where we brainstorm and help each

Re: [VOTE] Isis to enter the incubator

On Sep 1, 2010, at 3:42 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote: The Isis proposal has now been updated with a champion and several new mentors (thanks again guys), and is ready to be voted on. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal , the text is also copied

Re: an experiment

On 08/16/2010 10:36 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Again, if the PPMC has 3 or more PMC members, it should be capable of mustering the necessary votes by virtue of those PMC members voting. Have I repeated the every Incubator project should have at least 3 PMC members providing oversight mantra

Re: an experiment

On 08/16/2010 07:30 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: That is not the message that we get from most participants, but if that is the case, then let's fix it. As I mentioned in a previous post, the main problem we (ATS) had was to get enough binding votes. Even from the IPMC we failed one release

Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator

On 6/21/10 11:29 AM, Eric Yang wrote: Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. The proposal is posted at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal +1 (non-binding). Cheers, -- Leif

Re: PPMC membership lists?

On 06/03/2010 08:46 AM, Nick Burch wrote: Hi All I've just had a question from someone in Chemistry, one of the projects I mentor, about ppmc vs committership. Having explained it, I wanted to check who was currently on the Chemistry ppmc, but I couldn't seem to find the list anywhere...

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up

On 05/24/2010 10:56 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: The following are listed this month: abdera buildr log4php openwebbeans subversion trafficserver uima Its done for Log4PHP, thanks for the reminder Trafficserver is cleaned up too, sorry for the delay. -- leif

Re: Cross Cloud TLP, was Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project

On 5/12/10 10:29 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: thinking about this a little I think a TLP that grouped the Cloud technologies together make a lot of sense. With LibCloud, DeltaCloud, Whirr, etc. as a start there will clearly be some additional projects coming. +1. I think it'll be easier too

[RESULT] [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

On 03/10/2010 09:10 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: Hi, Trying this again, the artifact is still the same as the previous attempt, but I'm trying to improve this request email, to hopefully get a few more votes. The Traffic Server PPMC has voted on and approved the release of TS v2.0.0-alpha. We

[RESULT][VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

On 03/05/2010 12:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: Hi, The Traffic Server PPMC has voted on and approved the release of TS v2.0.0-alpha. We would now like to request the approval from the Incubator PMC for this release. The original vote thread is After 5 days, I'm calling this [vote

[VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

is signed by me (Leif Hedstrom (CODE SIGNING KEY) zw...@apache.org, fingerprint is 5D7BBC5A). I have verified that this key is available on at least two key servers, and the KEYS file for the project includes it as well: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/trafficserver/KEYS The checksums

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

On 03/08/2010 05:09 PM, ant elder wrote: O I had a look. Unfortunately the main release artifact apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha.tar.bz2 is missing the top level LICENSE and NOTICE files. Those are mentioned in the README and Are you sure? I just downloaded it (as linked

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

On 03/05/2010 12:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: The Traffic Server PPMC has voted on and approved the release of TS v2.0.0-alpha. We would now like to request the approval from the Incubator PMC for this release. The original vote thread is Message-ID: 4b8d5deb.2050...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

On 03/08/2010 05:09 PM, ant elder wrote: O I had a look. Unfortunately the main release artifact apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha.tar.bz2 is missing the top level LICENSE and NOTICE files. Those are mentioned in the README and Are you sure? I just downloaded it (as linked above):

[VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha.tar.bz2.sha1 http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha.tar.bz2.asc The .asc signature is signed by me (Leif Hedstrom (CODE SIGNING KEY) zw...@apache.org). The checksums are md5sum: 18f914f3873bc4d22c5f3115b9db011f sha1sum

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

On 03/05/2010 12:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: The release candidate artifact and checksums / signature can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/ http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha.tar.bz2 http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/apache

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Spatial Information Systems Proposal

On 02/17/2010 06:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: Is one mentor/champion enough? Ah - missed that one this time ;-) More than one mentor is needed, considering Ian's experience with the Incubator I'd

Re: Checking status of transfer rights ?

On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Miles Libbey wrote: Yes -- Is this the final decision about how we are to proceed? Apache legal-discuss hasn't been clear. To not stall, lets work on both ends, get the we won't sue you paper signed and submitted, and keep working on the transfer of the remaining

Re: Checking status of transfer rights ?

On 02/10/2010 02:01 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Does it make sense to ask Yahoo to write a letter that tells they won't sue us over the TM? That I'm pretty confident we can get done ASAP. Miles? -- leif - To

Checking status of transfer rights ?

Hi, sorry if this is not the right channel for this question, but, I'd like to find out if ASF has received any paperworks from Yahoo!, showing that we've transfered the rights for Traffic Server code to ASF. If not, is there a form that they need to fill out and submit? Also, I know we

Re: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?

On 02/02/2010 11:57 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Hi general@, I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub. (We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2349) +1 from me too. As a current incubator contributor, this

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dalesa P2P Web Cache Project

On 02/02/2010 09:22 AM, Wathsala Vithanage wrote: Hi, We would like to incubate the project Dalesa at Apache incubator and join Apache Software Foundation. You can find the proposal at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DalesaProposal. Dalesa is a P2P web cache which could become an alternative

Re: Handling of Traffic Server Trademark

On 01/19/2010 01:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:50, Noel J. Bergmann...@devtech.com wrote: Leif Hedstrom wrote: Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues. Who would be able to make this call? snip/ Does anyone else have

Re: Incubator Board Report January 2010

On 01/18/2010 09:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: The Incubator appears to be running smoothly, with nothing regarding Board level attention. Maybe it doesn't require the boards attention, but Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues. Who would be able to make this call?

Re: Where to add PPMC member additions?

On 11/26/2009 03:46 AM, ant elder wrote: I'm not sure I've ever seen PPMC members listed anywhere, the only way i've found them is from the subscribers to the poddlings private list. It sounds like we need to update http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html at least? I have no

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Clerezza

On 11/22/2009 05:27 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür reto.bachm...@trialox.org wrote: ...The full proposal can be found on the wiki at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal ... And we are

Where to add PPMC member additions?

Hi, reading http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, it says (towards the end) to add new PPMC members to this SVN file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/incubator-info.txt but, I get a 404 not found on that URL. Where do I add new PPMC members for our

Re: Adding Paul Querna as committer to Traffic Server

On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, the Traffic Server podling PMC has deliberated hard, and we've decided that it's best for everyone if we add Paul Querna as a committer to the Traffic

Adding Paul Querna as committer to Traffic Server

! -- leif Binding Votes: Doug Cutting [+1] (Champion and Mentor) Jean-Frederic Clere [+1] (Mentor) Bryan Call [+1] Leif Hedstrom [+1] Vijaya Bhaskar Mamidi [+1] Anirban Kundu [+1] Miles Libbey [+1] Steve jiang [+1] Dima Ruban [+1] Ray Rivera [+1] Andrew Hsu [-0] Non-binding votes: Mark Nottingham

Re: Adding Paul Querna as committer to Traffic Server

On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, the Traffic Server podling PMC has deliberated hard, and we've decided that it's best for everyone if we add Paul Querna as a committer to the Traffic

Re: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

On 10/28/2009 08:58 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: +1, but I would like to see a more imaginative name ;-) Nephelococcygia ? ;-) Not that it matters, but +1 from me too, this sounds really useful. -- leif - To unsubscribe,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

On 10/28/2009 08:19 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote: The better thing is that Adobe finally opened RTMP specification [1]. The specification license prohibits unintended use of rtmp for for violating digital protection (this somehow relates to new GPL v.3 features) and intercepting video, othewise it

Compatible licenses for Traffic Server

, trafficserver-...@incubator.apache.org , Leif Hedstrom le...@yahoo-inc.com Subject: Compatible licenses for Traffic Server Reply-To: andrew@yahoo-inc.com Hello, I'm putting together the LICENSE and NOTICE files for the initial commit of Traffic Server. At the same time we are working

Re: Wink, Traffic Server, VXQuery initial steps

On 08/07/2009 02:18 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: Hi, I added Wink and got the clutch/site generated at http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Sponsor . Seems the site has synched up. Please let me know if there's anything else missing. The Traffic Server page has been added, and seems

Re: Wink, Traffic Server, VXQuery initial steps

On 08/06/2009 06:12 PM, David Crossley wrote: Would the projects Wink, Traffic Server, VXQuery please add themselves to the main Currently in incubation table: [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ Yep, I just started working on this today for the Traffic Server project. We got all

[Proposal][Vote] Traffic Server

they would overlap. Core Developers * Leif Hedstrom leif at yahoo-inc.com * Bryan Call bcall at yahoo-inc.com * Vijaya Bhaskar Mamidi vmamidi at yahoo-inc.com * Steve Jiang sjiang at yahoo-inc.com * Dima Ruban dima at yahoo-inc.com

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote: I'll be interested in this. Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from httpd/proxy eyes. Just say the word, and I'll add you to the proposed mentor list. :) -- Leif

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:46 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Leif Hedstrom wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Add me. Sweet, thanks! I have updated the draft proposal with the three mentors that we have so far. How many do we need before we could be considered for a vote? I'd like to join as well. Great

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:52 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope),I'll submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve the TM issues around Traffic Server before we do this, in case we end up having to rename the

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

On Jun 25, 2009, at 7:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I don't think that is a problem: httpd (and other ASF project) also uses autconf/autoheader/automake to generate the configure that are included in the sources tarballs. Cool! One more (followup) question: We have a couple of files

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

Leo Simons wrote: Is there anything else missing? Nope, it looks like you have your ducks in a row! +1 from me. Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope), I'll submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve the TM issues around Traffic

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: We would like to submit the Traffic Server proposal to the incubator. Our draft is available at I don't see a direct problem with few non-Yahoo developers for entering incubation, but it

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

Jim Jagielski wrote: Add me. Sweet, thanks! I have updated the draft proposal with the three mentors that we have so far. How many do we need before we could be considered for a vote? Also, besides the lack of non-yahoo committers, are there any other concerns with the draft? I'm still

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

Roy T. Fielding wrote: I know, and they may be prevented (by former employee contract) from talking about it until after Y! makes the code public. I would just place it on the wish list of things to do before graduating. Sounds good. Do I need to put more explicit into the proposal draft?

Re: [Proposal] Traffic Server

Roy T. Fielding wrote: I like the idea, though I would prefer that a larger group of committers (outside Yahoo!) were known up front because that sounds like a big code base. Any chance you could convince some of the former coders to join in the proposal? This is definitely a valid concern. We

[Proposal] Traffic Server

Good morning, We would like to submit the Traffic Server proposal to the incubator. Our draft is available at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficServerProposal A quick overview of Traffic Server: Traffic Server is a Yahoo! / Inktomi caching proxy server. It has been actively