Hi Rob,
In the deluge of drivel I lost this gem in your response to
my scepticism about how quickly you could provide a binary release:
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 10:31 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony has done IP
remediation at many
Hi Noel,
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:13 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I heard about this, myself, in some specific detail very recently.
I will leave disclosure to the relevant parties, but while it may
or may not be an issue for you ...
I rest my case about FUD. It seems hard for me to
Hi Sam,
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:54 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
The net of all of this is that there will need to be a substantial
public aspect to this entire discussion. Yes, I will probably have
some private discussions with ASF lawyers over time over this matter,
but I can't see any way that
Hi Jim,
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 16:14 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
certainly don't help. It just reinforces a perceived division
as well as almost forcing the other side to take a defensive
stance.
Hey ho; I see my name being taken intravenously ;-) so the longer quote
from a private
Hi Rob,
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 21:26 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Finally, I think we're exaggerating the difficulty of getting out a
release of OpenOfice. LibreOffice did it very quickly. And so did IBM
with Symphony. This is not rocket science.
I am impressed by your
Hi Ross,
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 12:09 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
However, I do have a binding vote here and therefore I have a
couple of questions for you:
..
Are the goals of the TDF the same as the goals of this proposal
to the Apache Software Foundation.
I would say they are
