On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Leif Hedstrom l...@ogre.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
the Traffic Server podling PMC has deliberated hard, and we've decided
that it's best for
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
[...]
I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to:
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
Incubator private
Ben Laurie wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
There is a proposed PGP package being discussed in Jakarta Commons. Would
there be any overlap at lower levels (not at the WS layer) between them,
providing for some collaboration?
This strikes me as orthogonal, but it might be of interest that I'm
Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:02 PM
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN.
[...]
Agreed. -1 as a requirement; +1 as a recommendation.
Ditto.
Sander
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:58 PM
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants of this
list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 23:55, Leo Simons wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
I'd like to call for a vote to graduate SpamAssassin from the
Incubator.
looking at the status file
! Verify distribution rights
|| date || item
| -..-.. | Check and make sure that for all code included
[X] +1 - The SpamAssassin project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 02:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm changing the subject to make it clear to those skimming their mail that
this is a VOTE to incubate Beehive, based upon their proposal.
See:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tor.apache.orgby=threadfrom=769038
Hi,
Can someone regenerate the site? Updates were committed to the
spamassassin.cwiki and it would be nice to see those published.
Thanks,
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 12:30, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
I became involved in the last few months in the Catacomb effort
(http://www.webdav.org/catacomb). For those of you who don't know this
project, it's all about building a mod_dav plugin/provider that, using a
RDBMS as a backend, provides
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 01:45, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2004 01:28 CET Justin Mason wrote:
given the *massive* numbers of issues with this list in its current
home, I suggest we may be better off moving it to Apache.org sooner
rather than later.
Currently, our status
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 04:13, Justin Mason wrote:
--BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
Hash: SHA1
[resend, last one was misaddressed ;). Added some more text as well,
BTW, so previous mail can be ignored.]
Sander -- here's our status report. Please feel free to take this and
mangle it
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 14:04, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 22 Jan 2004, at 9:56, Sander Striker wrote:
Copyright and distribution rights still remain to be verified,
although
all CLAs should now be in, assuming Matt Sergeant finally got around
to it
;) -- so it's up to ASF legal now
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 19:01, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The Incubator project board report is due in a bit more than a week, as
the board meeting should take place on Wed, 21 Jan 2004, 10am Pacific [1].
Thus all Mentors should ensure that every Incubating
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 01:15, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Thursday 22 January 2004 00:34 CET Erik Abele wrote:
Indeed and if someone is really interested in meeting other
German/Austrian/Swiss/etc. ASF fellows, he/she should have a look at
/docs/de-meeting in the committers CVS module. (only
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 04:10, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hello folks,
This is what i have been thinking about. For long.
Committership in specified duration.
For example, Log4XXX (New Project) needs some
committers in order to improve the quality of the
codebases rapidly and reliably, it
Hi guys,
Can we go back to friendly replies again?
The thread 'Re: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers'
is starting to sound a lot more hostile that it has to be.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 06:34, Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodent of Unusual Size writes:
o All projects under incubation must use a STATUS file (or a
status.xml file if the project prefers XML) that contains
information the PMC needs
Interesting enough to seek some feedback.
My initial reaction is:
- you can't maintain code which isn't covered by CLAs
- 'unconvered' code may sit in our repo for code history purposes*
- The 2.6x branch should be svn rm'd
- No release may ever be done from the 2.6x branch
Given that
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 02:23, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Incubator not interested in providing advice?
Yes, it is. But, considering the holidays, cut everyone
some slack.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 13:42, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Apart from the general agreement on PPMCs, for this particular vote
instance there has been a +1 from me, one from Noel, on with changes
from Aaron and a positive comment from Leo.
Thus, and also given the rule we have tacitly agreed
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 18:49, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
First of all, we are in the process of deciding and clearly documenting
that only TLPs are to be incubated. Why? Because in Apache there are
only TLPs. Thus, Ruper is incubated on the
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:00, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
You speak as if there was no possible way to get into Apache before the
Incubator.
That is not what I said. Clearly it could not be true, since the Incubator
was not created until October 2002.
Neither one of us was present when the
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 11:10, Leo Simons wrote:
The only one who can change
a charter is the board, or the collective members, right?
Given the responses given here by some of the board
members already, I doubt the board feels like it.
What usually happens is that a project produces an amended
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 09:29, Bruce Snyder wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said:
BL 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
BL accountable for their decision.
BL
BL+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique position. We are
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 22:25, Aaron Bannert wrote:
The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
of the following choices:
[ ] - Let them keep Geronimo as the official name.
[ ] - Punt the
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 01:32, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Guys,
I there are no objections I would like to forward mail from the sf.net
ldapd project to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. This is obviously
a short term thing until the community has switched over completely to
the Apache infrastructure.
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 04:30, Alex Karasulu wrote:
We've already made announcements. If this is the way you want
us to proceed I can recall the infrastructure request. Should
we do that?
You already did the announcements, and I personally have less
of a problem subscribing the list of people
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 8:51 AM
Cannot open /home/cvs/CVSROOT/commitlogs/incubator: Permission denied
The group permissions on that file are wrong -- I've asked root to
fix it.
Fixed.
Sander
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 2:33 PM
Stephen McConnell wrote:
I think the real reason is that I have a lot of scepticism about the
successful functioning of the Incubator. I imaging future scenarios
where candidates are keep waiting
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:06 PM
There have been no objections, so I would appreciate it if we could
get rid of the incubator unix group in favor of apcvs for everything
except the incubator-core repository:
Done.
I'll cleanup the
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 3:49 AM
Meritocracy?
Here is a good stats on this ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mailing list.
Excuse me, but volume of messages has nothing to do with merit. Roy T.
Fielding posts very infrequently in my
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 6:16 AM
I see. but here's one question. Does this meritocracy
encourage the inactive *ASF members* into the retirement status
or hibernation status?
This is something for the ASF membership to worry about.
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 12:47 PM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:21:07 +0200
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, do not post stats of any kind to say something about merit.
Okay, Sander. I will not. I promise
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:04 AM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:25:35 -0400
Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the foundation *as a whole*. presumably you care about the welfare
of japan, but don't know what's going in in
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:11 AM
My understanding from discussion with Sam and Ken was that creation of a new
TLP or migrating to an existing one would be an exit, not entry, issue.
That's correct. However, it wouldn't make much
From: Richard Monson-Haefel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:18 AM
Well, I'm pretty ignorant about Apache's ways, but it was my understanding
that the original committers would vote in the PMC. Is that correct?
Not at this point no. This project starts in the
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:39 AM
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:01:53PM +0100, Paul Hammant wrote:
Greg,
Paul -- please set your umask [on login] to enable group-write on the files
in /www/incubator.apache.org. It is making it very difficult
Hi,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:14 PM
jefft 2003/08/07 06:13:39
Added: src/documentation/content/forms
ASF_Contributor_License_1_form.pdf
ASF_Contributor_License_2.pdf
From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:10 AM
You do realize that I'm neither a member of the Incubator PMC nor do I
support its existence. Create the mail list. The name shouldn't be up to
the Incubator, it should be up to the XML PMC. Its you're baby,
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:08 PM
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:58:51 +0200
(Subject: RE: XMLBean project creation request)
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 if it is outside of apache.org.
How about PHP's case?
PHP is an historical
From: Erik Abele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:18 PM
[...]
Okay, I'm fine with this for now, but without an explicitly stated
policy this discussion will come up every time a project arrives at the
incubator. We definitely need a policy here, IMHO!
I agree. I
From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:07 AM
[...]
You should definitely document what you think is important to
exit the incubation process. I suggest committing something
to the incubator CVS (see the other projects' STATUS files
for a template).
May
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:39 PM
smoothly as anticipated. Nevertheless, the following projects
are being incubated as we speak:
[...]
o Tapestry:
A complete framework offering an alternative to JSP Velocity
scripting
Hi,
+1: Jim Jagielski, B.W. Fitzpatrick, Sander Striker, Nicola Ken Barozzi,
Ken Coar, Paul Hammant
No negative votes.
Tapestry exit Incubator...
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:48 PM
+1
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
47 matches
Mail list logo
