+1 (binding)
On 14/04/17 04:25, Josh Elser wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
> development with no change on the horizon.
>
> Context for those interesting in reading:
On 07/10/16 13:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name including incubating
> - signature and hashed good
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> - Files have Apache header except this file [1]. Please fix in the next
> release.
This file is generated
+1 (binding)
Tim
On 07/10/16 02:08, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating release has passed. We
> kindly request that the IMPC now vote on the release..
>
> The PPMC vote thread is located here:
>
Hi Ted,
The subject line was not modified, but you can see the [RESULT] announced
to the general@incubator.a.o list here
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201608.mbox/%3CCAD637oPkCXQ2SM67Uwe0kAmKO4uMKrBnBsbDcmvvNk_13wh%3D2g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Regards,
Tim
On 30 August
+1 binding
Regards,
Tim
On 26/08/16 13:37, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating release has passed after
> updating the cryptographic export information; it is a source-only release
> (no binary artifacts). We kindly request that the
On 25/08/16 00:48, Justin Mclean wrote:
> -1 binding, willing to change my vote if encryption code issue
> clarified.
>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/
>> repositories/orgapachepirk-1002
>
> Please place the artefacts in the correct place [1]
+1 (binding) for the reasons already stated by others - reduces
engagement friction as projects pass through the incubator.
Having a clear indication on the site that the project is in incubation
works better than the URL segment.
Regards,
Tim
On 28/06/16 15:28, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
>
rol
>
> Pirk requests use of Git for source control (git://git.apache.org/pirk.git).
> We request a writeable Git repo for Pirk with mirroring to be setup to
> Github through INFRA.
>
> Issue Tracking
>
> JIRA Pirk (PIRK)
>
> Initial Committers
>
On 25/11/14 19:39, sebb wrote:
On 25 November 2014 at 17:58, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/11/14 14:59, John D. Ament wrote:
On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
When you get the MODERATE mail you should replyAll and send
On 24/11/14 17:39, John D. Ament wrote:
On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 10:29:02 AM Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/11/14 14:35, John D. Ament wrote:
Does anyone know the mail command to send out to allow marvin emails
to get to a list without moderation?
If the mail hits moderation
On 25/11/14 14:59, John D. Ament wrote:
On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
When you get the MODERATE mail you should replyAll and send the
acknowledgement to the *-accept-* and *-allow-tc.* addresses.
So, if in the future we wanted to do
On 24/11/14 14:35, John D. Ament wrote:
Does anyone know the mail command to send out to allow marvin emails
to get to a list without moderation?
If the mail hits moderation then I/some other mod will allow it through
and add Marvin to the allowed senders' list.
Tim
Julian,
There are a few more messages from this sender in the moderator queue
that I'm looking at, and while I agree they don't add a great deal of
value, I'm struggling to see the goal if they are (malicious) spam.
I'm guessing we don't want to ban people for being misguided, or lack of
insight
On 15/Feb/2010 20:56, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Would there be interest in a project to develop Android-based apps?
know that it sounds like an umbrella, and perhaps it would be until we
developed some critical mass, but it would provide us with a place to
collaborate.
For those people who are
Hudson build machine accounts are created upon request for members of
(P)PMCs.
Does the Cassandra project have a PPMC? I don't see one in the
asf-authorization file, and have a request from Eric for an account [1].
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2362
Thanks,
Tim
On 30/Jul/2009 23:48, Craig L Russell wrote:
We just received a fax from FAX-SJC-101-TDM that came in ruined.
The first page is completely unreadable except for the country: USA.
The second page came in ok but I can't decipher the signature.
If anyone knows who sent this fax, please
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Hi,
So, can someone tell me what the rules are regarding TLPs bringing in
subprojects directly to their TLP rather than coming through incubator?
To add to Bill's response, the general position is;
+1
it would be good to see collaboration with the Harmony project, at least
as a provider of VM diagnostic information.
Tim
ant elder wrote:
The Kato proposal has been out for discussion for a few weeks now,
please vote on accepting the Kato project for incubation.
The full Kato proposal
Alan Cabrera wrote:
Can I enter these into the svn repository myself or does the secretary
have to do it? I have people who submitted theirs almost a month ago
and are still waiting.
I usually send them to the secretary, and cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The secassist usually commits them within a
The Harmony community have voted [1] to accept a contribution [2] of
Microemulator code.
The software grant has been recorded by the ASF Secretary, and the IP
form completed in the incubator website [3].
Please shout if there are any concerns.
[1]
Would the Incubator PMC be kind enough to grant me sufficient karma in
preparation for bringing code contributions through the IP Process into
the Harmony project.
Thanks,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Would the Incubator PMC be kind enough to grant me sufficient karma in
preparation for bringing code contributions through the IP Process into
the Harmony project.
All PMC Chairs already have write access to the Incubator site for this
specific
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
together with Charles M. Chen I came up with a proposal to move the
great open source java image library, Sanselan, to Apache.
Now, currently we are looking for interested parties, especially for
mentors and a sponsoring project, perhaps commons would be a good
place
after Minotaur is
revived and personal @apache.org mail flows again...)
+1 on this thread too to help it along.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 20/10/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
To be clear, our snapshots are more than a simple snap of
Subversion --
we (the Harmony community) discuss the right time to create the
development snapshot to accommodate known instability
On 20/10/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look. You guys are freakin' nuts.
:-) that is a pre-req' for tackling something like harmony.
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Greg Stein wrote:
On 10/19/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. I said it would be useful to see if the community can make it
happen. I know that *some individuals* can, but that is different. I
didn't vote, I didn't say it was a requirement, just asked: why can't
you pull
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
the wrong thing by
displaying the mark-up.
Consider replacing it with
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK
me if I'm just being dumb -- otherwise I'll raise a JIRA issue on
infra.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200507.mbox/index.html
[2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-generalm=112286923903658
Regards,
Tim Ellison
David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05
30 matches
Mail list logo
