Re: Looking for Champion

GPL license copyright by Oracle was "fixed" to be an Apache license copyright Baidu. So if this project does enter incubation I think we should be extra careful to audit the origins of all of the source code. -Todd > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: &g

Re: Looking for Champion

mailing lists. The usual mailing lists are > >>expected to be set up when entering incubation: > >> > >> > >>priv...@palo.incubator.apache.org<mailto:private@ > palo.incubator.apache.or > >>g> > >> d...@palo.incubator.apache.org<mailto:d...@palo.incubator.apache.org> > >> > >>comm...@palo.incubator.apache.org<mailto:commits@ > palo.incubator.apache.or > >>g> > >> > >> ###Subversion Directory > >> > >> Upon entering incubation: https://github.com/baidu/palo. > >> After incubation, we want to move the existing repo from > >>https://github.com/baidu/palo to Apache infrastructure. > >> > >> ###Issue Tracking > >> > >> Palo currently uses GitHub to track issues. Would like to continue to > >>do so while we discuss migration possibilities with the ASF Infra > >>committee. > >> > >> ###Other Resources > >> > >> The existing code already has unit tests so we will make use of > >>existing Apache continuous testing infrastructure. The resulting load > >>should not be very large. > >> > >> ##Initial Committers > >> > >> * Ruyue Ma (https://github.com/maruyue, > >>maru...@baidu.com<mailto:maru...@baidu.com>) > >> * Chun Zhao (https://github.com/imay, > >>buaa.zh...@gmail.com<mailto:buaa.zh...@gmail.com>) > >> * Mingyu Chen (https://github.com/morningman,chenmin...@baidu.com) > >> * De Li（https://github.com/lide-reed, > >>mailtol...@sina.com）<mailto:mailtol...@sina.com%EF%BC%89> > >> * Hao Chen (https://github.com/chenhao7253886, > >>chenha...@baidu.com<mailto:chenha...@baidu.com>) > >> * Chaoyong Li (https://github.com/cyongli, > >>lichaoy...@baidu.com<mailto:lichaoy...@baidu.com>) > >> * Bin Lin (https://github.com/lingbin, > >>lingbi...@gmail.com<mailto:lingbi...@gmail.com>) > >> > >> ##Affiliations > >> > >> The initial committers are employees of Baidu Inc.. The nominated > >>mentors are employees of TODO. > >> > >> ##Sponsors > >> > >> ###Champion > >> > >> TODO > >> > >> ###Nominated Mentors > >> > >> * sijie guo, guosi...@gmail.com<mailto:guosi...@gmail.com> > >> * Luke Han, luke...@apache.org<mailto:luke...@apache.org> > >> * Zheng Shao, zs...@apache.org<mailto:zs...@apache.org> > >> > >> ###Sponsoring Entity > >> > >> We are requesting the Incubator to sponsor this project. > >> > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

<l...@apache.org> > * Lenni Kuff <lsk...@apache.org> > * Marcel Kornacker <mar...@apache.org> > * Martin Grund <mgr...@apache.org> > * Matthew Jacobs <mjac...@apache.org> > * Michael Brown <mi...@apache.org> > * Michael Ho <k...@apache.org> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

Hey John, I'm not sure if Jim (proposed PMC chair) has surveyed all the PMC members recently but I'm in touch with a good number of the PMC so I think I have a good sense, and I'll take a whack at answering this: It looks like of the proposed 24 PMC members, 15 work at Cloudera, the original

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

che.org> > >> * Ishaan Joshi <is...@apache.org> > >> * Jim Apple <jb...@apache.org> > >> * John Russell <jr...@apache.org> > >> * Juan Yu <jy...@apache.org> > >> * Lars Volker <lv...@apache.org> > >> * Lenni Kuff &l

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.9.0 release candidate 1

e.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > > impala/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > impala/KEYS> > > >. > > > > To run RAT, follow the instructions in bin/check-rat-report.py. To > > build, follow the instructions in bin/bootstrap_build.sh. &

TSU/ECCN notification for Impala podling

Hey folks, I'm helping out the Impala podling with their ECCN (crypto export) notice. I added them to the page at http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ (well, really I just committed a patch provided by Sailesh Mukil). The next step is to send the TSU NOTIFICATION email to the various US

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

t 72 hours, or until the necessary > > number of votes (3 +1) is reached. > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > > > Thanks, > > Jim > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

* Nick Gamb: Centrify > * Sai Ganji: Cloudwick > * Gabriela Lima Garza: Intel > * Victor Gonzalez: Intel > * Mark Grover: Cloudera > * Morris Hicks: Cloudera > * Ritu Kama: Intel > * Austin Leahy: eBay > * Ashrith Mekala: Cloudwick > * Diego Ortiz: Intel > * Sudharshan Rao PakalaSai: Cloudwick > * Srinivasa Reddy: Cloudera > * Alan Ross: Intel > * Everardo Lopez Sandoval: Intel > * Nathan Segerlind: Intel > * Vartika Singh: Cloudera > * Nathanael Smith: Intel > * Carlos Villavicencio: Intel > > == Sponsors == > > === Champion === > > * Doug Cutting - Cloudera > > === Nominated Mentors === > > * Brock Noland - ASF Member, phData > * Jarek Jarcec Cecho - ASF Member, StreamSets > * Andrei Savu - Cloudera > * Uma Maheswara Rao G - Intel > > === Sponsoring Entity === > > The Apache Incubator. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while > under incubation? > Yes, just one added committer so far. We've had five releases during incubation (3 minor releases with new features,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 released

The Apache Kudu (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of Kudu 0.9.1! Kudu is an open source storage engine for structured data which supports low-latency random access together with efficient analytical access patterns. It is designed within the context of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > * Although redirections are correctly handled, I'd remove all getkudu.io > links in the documentation to use the new canonical domain kudu.apache.org > > * I noticed you incubating releases are not clearly marked

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

72 hours have passed, so this vote is now closed. We had 6 binding +1s. Thanks for voting! -Todd On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1 passed and > I'm now submittin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > But would be good clarify licenses of patches and fix up the slightly > confusing section in LICENSE. > > Thanks for your thorough check as always. Notes below: > I checked: > - incubating

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

> binding votes on this subject. > > > > [+1] I want the two URLs to both work the same. > > [+/- 0] Don't care > > [-1] I want the $podling.incubator.apache.org URL to be the one that > > works, > > including emails. > > > > John > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > >> Hi Todd, >> >> If the release managers log in to id.apache.org and put thei

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Todd, > > If the release managers log in to id.apache.org and put their > keys in their profile the kudu.asc will get generated automatically. > Hrm, when I log in, it shows: OpenPGP Public

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi All, > > minor nit first: > > there are no KEYS present in: > > > > And, the Git WP repo doesn’t have a KEYS file. > > Can someone point me to

[VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1 passed and I'm now submitting this to the IPMC. Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201606.mbox/%3CCADY20s6%3D%2BnKNgvx%3DG_pKupQGiH%2B9ToS53LqExBwWM6vLp-ns9A%40mail.gmail.com%3E Result:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

-- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2016

e. > > Mentors > --- > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms > for the Incubator PMC. > > Incubator PMC > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The specific cases of BSD-licensed software here is FindProtobuf.cmake, > which > > is a build-time-only dependency and does not become part of the binary > > distribution. > > If there is a binary distribution

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

Hi Justin, Thanks for voting (and for your +1 despite there being some questions). Responses inline: On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - signatures and hashes fine > - name contains incubating > - DISCLAIMER exists >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

ions) > > gearpump-dev > > gearpump-user > > gearpump-commits > > > > Git repository > > Git is the preferred source control system: git:// > git.apache.org/gearpump > > > > Documentation > > https://gearpump.incubator.apache.org/docs/ > > > > JIRA instance > > JIRA Gearpump (GEARPUMP) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/gearpump > > > > === Initial Committers === > > * Xiang Zhong > > > > * Tianlun Zhang > > > > * Qian Xu > > > > * Huafeng Wang > > > > * Kam Kasravi > > > > * Weihua Jiang > > > > * Tomasz Targonski > > > > * Karol Brejna > > > > * Gang Wang > > > > * Mark Chmarny > > > > * Xinglang Wang > > > > * Lan Wang > > > > * Jianzhong Chen > > > > * Xuefu Zhang > > > > * Rui Li > > > > === Affiliations === > > * Xiang Zhong – Intel > > > > * Tianlun Zhang – Intel > > > > * Qian Xu – Intel > > > > * Huafeng Wang – Intel > > > > * Kam Kasravi – Intel > > > > * Weihua Jiang – Intel > > > > * Tomasz Targonski – Intel > > > > * Karol Brejna – Intel > > > > * Mark Chmarny – Intel > > > > * Gang Wang – Intel > > > > * Mark Chmarny – Intel > > > > * Xinglang Wang – Ebay > > > > * Lan Wang – Huawei > > > > * Jianzhong Chen – Cloudera > > > > * Xuefu Zhang – Cloudera > > > > * Rui Li – Intel > > > > === Sponsors === > > > > Champion > > Andrew Purtell > > > > Nominated Mentors > > * Andrew Purtell > > > > * Jarek Jarcec Cecho > > > > * Todd Lipcon > > > > * Xuefu Zhang > > > > * Reynold Xin > > > > Sponsoring Entity > > Apache Incubator PMC​ > > > > ​ > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing: > > > > """ > > src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib) > > src/kudu/util (some portions): 3-clause BSD license >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

t of the above licenses, please refer to the license headers at the top of the respective files. """ ...and then make sure that those files contain the full text of the license, instead of copy-pasting the text into LICENSE.txt. Does that sound like the best path forward? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

Hi Justin, I'm working on making the changes you suggested below. A few follow-up questions: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm, I'm not seeing this -- got a line number? Line 614 in LICENSE.txt > > says "StumbleUpon”. > > Sorry it was

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for >> the .NET foundation (who runs the

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

ross it now, Roman? > On Feb 26, 2016 5:33 PM, "Todd Lipcon" <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for >> the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not >> just some engineers. >>

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not just some engineers. -Todd On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hi Roman, > > Before we first publicly us

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

the clear. > > Probably best to double check on legal discuss re this if your not already > done so. > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

; /bin/sh: aclocal-1.14: command not found > make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127 Interesting. I run on Ubuntu but hopefully another Kudu developer will pipe up and might know what's going on here - probably missing some 'brew install ' in the docs. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC. Todd On Feb 22, 2016 7:10 AM, "Jean-Daniel Cryans" wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0's RC3 passed and > I'm now

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

..@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

point. My assumption is that there's no difference between that and "bundling" in which you are typically taking a release artifact as-is from another project. -Todd On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:10 AM

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

represented by adding the rest of > the work. > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > For the sake of all of these discussions, are "bundled dependencies" and > > "work derived from other projects source code&qu

Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-kudu.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE.txt;h=347de4f88b5e6240f6e560b2b1208364d6042c55;hb=HEAD#l553 -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: File headers for third party utility code

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > One thing to try here is contribute all changes back to the original > author(s), at least as patch submissions, so giving them the option to > incorporate it. > > Sure, I agree that makes sense in the case that

File headers for third party utility code

Hi all, I'm working on verifying licenses and copyrights, etc, in Apache Kudu (incubating). There is one area I wanted to confirm the right way to document in our LICENSE/NOTICE files: Kudu makes use of a lot of open source utility code borrowed from (or adapted from) other open source projects.

Re: File headers for third party utility code

ure what qualifies minor vs major. In some cases, we've done trivial edits like putting things in a "kudu" namespace or removing some portability code. In other cases, we've made more substantial alterations to fit our codebase (eg https://github.com/cloudera/kudu/commit/0ee3218b9edcd7e5e9d450307bc22d0eadfb53be ) but still kept the overall API/design. At what point do we go ahead and add the Apache License header? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Karma for Kudu podling committers

Hi all, I'm trying to follow the mentor guide to ensure that all of the initial committers for the new Kudu podling have the correct karma. The guide seems to be only half-updated for git, so having a bit of confusion here. My understanding from the guide is that for git, the

Re: Karma for Kudu podling committers

rg> > Cc: "d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org" <d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Karma for Kudu podling committers > > >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> The committers who need access t

Re: Moving Kudu and Impala to reporting group 2

Thanks, Marvin, that works well for us from the Kudu perspective. (Too late for the December report anyway IIRC) -Todd On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > We still have an imbalance for podlings in various reporting groups: > not

Modifications to SGA

Hi all, I'm working on completing the SGA for the contribution of Kudu. Our legal counsel has requested a few small changes to the text (just clarifications, nothing substantial). Can I submit the amended SGA, or do I need to have the changes signed off on the ASF side by some representative?

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache incubator

for a number of people who didn't specify). The -1 votes were related to code review policy which was discussed thoroughly in a separate thread. As this is a majority vote, the vote passes. Thanks for voting! -Todd +1 (binding) -- Todd Lipcon Reynold Xin Jarek Jarcec Cecho Jacques

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Much as I don’t care to participate in GPL projects I also don’t care to > participate in pure RTC projects as both restrict me in ways I very much > dislike, > > You're entitled to that opinion. I personally

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > 1. What makes you think all bugs are caught during code reviews (they > aren’t)? > They aren't. But some are. And catching them in code review is cheaper than catching them when a user hits them. Additionally,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's > been sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring > Impala to the ASF Incubator. > > I'd like to call a VOTE on

[VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

Percy mpe...@apache.org * Misty Stanley-Jones mi...@apache.org * Todd Lipcon t...@apache.org The initial list of committers was seeded by listing those contributors who have contributed 20 or more patches in the last 12 months, indicating that they are active and have achieved merit through

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal > is pasted below and also available on

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Basing the "diversity" on affiliaiton (or any other arbitrary property) is > quite bogus - I am with you and Roy on this. All I want to make sure that > people who contributed code and, perhaps, became inactive for

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > > The question is not to decide if C-T-R is The Apache Way over R-T-C. > The > > > question is wether a project entering incubation with a selected R-T-C > > > mode is likely to exit incubation for the simple

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Todd: as Ross notes, your three points about code reviews in a CTR project > are quite valid, and match accepted engineering practices. > > What I haven't seen is an explanation why a committer must be treated the > same as a

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

h, the RTC communities I'm a part of do the opposite: you can make a branch which operates under CTR, so long as it's reviewed sufficiently prior to its merge into trunk. This is great for rapid development and prototyping when a small number of contributors are working together on a new project. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

etc. On other projects that use gerrit, I rarely see a mergeable trivial patch last longer than a couple hours before someone clicks the necessary buttons to merge it. This may all seem orthogonal to RTC vs CTR, but I think my point is this: the actual review workflow strongly affects the rate of p

[DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

...@apache.org * Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org * Mike Percy mpe...@apache.org * Misty Stanley-Jones mi...@apache.org * Todd Lipcon t...@apache.org The initial list of committers was seeded by listing those contributors who have contributed 20 or more patches in the last 12 months

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > Sounds great. > > I would love to be an help as a committer, if possible. This seems to be > fantastic in line with my focus areas and can help existing big data > projects to accelerate so Kudu's growth is something I

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 08:53AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > ...RTC can be framed as "I don't trust you to do things right"... > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > For now, I think "meritocracy" should be followed -- when contributors > > demonstrate sufficient merit, we can add them as committers. Note that > > there are plenty of my coworkers who have made small

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > On the contrary... The business of the Incubator and IPMC is to help > podlings > and their communities to grok and follow the Apache Way. Trust is a > foundation > principal of a healthy community. Hence, this whole

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:53PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > > > So, you're saying that people were chosen to be listed or not as the

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

ld be followed -- when contributors demonstrate sufficient merit, we can add them as committers. Note that there are plenty of my coworkers who have made small contributions in the past, and they aren't listed as contributors either. Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Luke Han wrote: > In "community" section of this proposal, there are many companies > have been mentioned including Xiaomi, Dropbox, Intel and Dremio, > and said there are contributions from them. > > I think their engineers are more

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > >... > > > I think it's a _plus_ that contributors and committers contribute code in > > the same way -- it's m

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

dera (either individual ones, or via their employers). That said, if we need to track people down to get more explicit consent to contribute code to Apache, I'm sure folks should be fine with it. I'll await further instruction from the IPMC on this one. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

both do the correct action and be willing to listen objectively to > > criticism. In an CTR project it is clear to me that the point where a > > project grants Committership should be the point where the PMC wants to > > treat an individual's contribution as CTR rather than RTC. How does an > RTC > > project make THAT important decision? > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > >> > > Except that there seems to be great disagreement among the Members as to > > whether RTC is somehow anti-Apache-Way. > > > > If you want to try to create an ASF-wide resolution that RTC doesn't > follow > >

RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

[editing subject since the discussion has veered away from Sentry] On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > And I have to disagree with you Joe. To me, a mandatory RTC policy says > “we don’t trust anybody”. Sure, it doesn’t discriminate, but it is also

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > >... > > > 1) You're right, I don't trust anybody to make code changes to a complex > > project with zero over

IP clearance for properly licensed code

Hi all, Another hopefully simple question: The Mentor guide contains the following text: > > Existing codebases need to be imported through the standard IP clearance > process. This means that a Software Grant Agreement (SGA > ) or Contributor License >

Re: Releases during incubation?

Thanks, Joe! -Todd On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Joe Schaefer <joes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Subversion cut a release while in incubation on their old system. > Shouldn't pose a problem for others. > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org>

Releases during incubation?

Hey folks, Hopefully quick policy question here: Once a project is under proposal for incubation, what is the foundation policy on that project making releases outside of Apache from its current home? For example, suppose there's an open source project FooBar, with a public release FooBar 1.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Accept HTrace into the Apache Incubator

[ ] -1 because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

with contributions to several other Apache projects. Todd Lipcon and Tom White are committers to Apache Hadoop and multiple other related projects. Brock Noland is a Hive committer. === Homogenous Developers === The initial committers come from a number of companies and countries. Parquet has an active

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

, and Jonathan Coveney are also Apache Pig committers with contributions to several other Apache projects. Todd Lipcon and Tom White are committers to Apache Hadoop and multiple other related projects. Brock Noland is a Hive committer. === Homogenous Developers === The initial committers come from

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

staying with mainline and having to maintain a fork of a particular piece of code. Sometimes the latter makes sense, even within two closely-related projects. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

: On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: Hi Kevan, Responses below: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: What's the license for the file: doc/thrift.tex? This was contributed by Facebook, and thus falls under the Facebook CLA as Apache 2.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

: 9958c57c402c02171ba0bcc96183505c Thanks in advance for voting! -Todd On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote: The Thrift community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Thrift 0.2.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy, we would now like to request

Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

(and why it doesn't contain a source license header), looks like I'd be +1. --kevan On Dec 10, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: Hi all, Joe has pointed out that I didn't include the link to the tarball and signature: http://people.apache.org/~todd/thrift-0.2.0-incubating-rc0.tar.gz

[VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

The Thrift community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Thrift 0.2.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy, we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the tarball on the Thrift Download page. Please vote by 6 PM PST, Fri 12/11.