Re: ARIA TOSCA Project Proposal

Hi, just a note on the ARAI acronym if used as such. That acronym usually refers to: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA aka https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/ . Cheers Daniel On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Arthur Berezin wrote: > Hi All > > >

Re: Single person developed project

Hi Amareshwari, please have a look at the Apache Incubator Proposal Guide [1]. Under the section "Community" [2] you'll find the following statement: "Apache is interested only in communities." Does this answer your question? [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html [2]

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29 Cheers Daniel On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! I would like to open up a discussion thread on the proposals for the core of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya for Incubation

[ X ] +1 accept Tamaya in the Incubator [ ] ±0 [ ] -1 because... Cheers Daniel S. Haischt On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: +1 regards, gerhard

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Celix as Top Level Project

[ X ] +1 Graduate the Apache Celix podling from Apache Incubator as a TLP [ ] +0 Indifferent to the graduation status of Apache Celix podling [ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache Celix podling from Apache Incubator because ... Cheers Daniel On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Alexander Broekhuis

Re: [VOTE] fleece as new incubator project

[ X ] +1 accept Fleece in the Incubator [ ] +/-0 [ ] -1 because... Cheers Daniel On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Fleece as a new Incubator project. The proposal draft is

Re: Obfuscating' 3rd party jars

If Emma enacts your bytecode like Cobertura does for instance, you may consider not shipping such bytecode as well. Instead ship the one without debug symbols and the one which hasn't been enacted to be consumed by code coverage tools et al. Cheers Daniel On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Benson

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

Heh yeah I as well had the tuplespace implementation associated with Linda as I read Apache Linda :) Where Linda itself might have become historic, the concept still is in use. E.g. [1]. [1] http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1739850CFID=202524342CFTOKEN=19022440 Cheers Daniel On Fri, Nov 16,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

tuplespaces are STILL well known and Linda is one or even its original implementation where JavaSapces is another and later on grid computing borrowed some ideas [1] from it etc pp. So I wouldn't make a statement as such as Linda nowadays is ancient technology (to use a strong term). Anyway we had

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

Btw, I think the Wikipedia reference in the Tuple Space article to the blackboard metaphor is misleading cause it's already bound to AI expert systems such as Hofstadter's copycat... if I have collected enough evidence I'll change the article accordingly :) Cheers Daniel On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

Btw, the important part missing up to now in this discussion is the OPEN in Linked OPEN Data. If I get it right without openness the whole idea will be crippled to a certain extend. Cheers Daniel On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Sebastian Schaffert sebastian.schaff...@salzburgresearch.at

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

Well I still opt to use Meta descriptors such as Maven POMs or CMake (probably only applicable for native projects) files in such cases which would allow to generate Eclipse/IDE you name it specific files once the sources has been obtained. Cheers Daniel On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:22 PM, sebb

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

-generated in the beginning ;) Cheers Daniel On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: The more practical and pragmatic question to pose is: why would you want to add license headers to generated files. You would have to take care of that they won't disappear each time

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

The more practical and pragmatic question to pose is: why would you want to add license headers to generated files. You would have to take care of that they won't disappear each time the file (e.g. .classpath) is getting re-generated. Again from a practical point of view a mentoring suggestion

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

[X] +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator (non-binding) [] +0: don't care [] -1: do not accept CloudStack into Incubator (please explain the objection) Cheers Daniel On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Kevin Kluge kevin.kl...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All.  I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to

Re: Is there an ASF license for Apple's Apple Developer Program ?

+1 Cheers Daniel On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 3/31/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote: There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of

Re: Is there an ASF license for Apple's Apple Developer Program ?

It might as well be worth discussing whether it would be possible to arrange something similar as the MSDN agreement with Microsoft where ASF committers would have wild card access to the iOS developer program, the Mac developer program and the Safari developer program. I currently have each of

Re: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator

[ x ] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: Cheers Daniel On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of developers behind it

Re: [PROPOSAL] PhoneGap for Apache Incubator

Out of curiosity, are there any reasons to not develop the proposal on the incubator wiki [1]? [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ Cheers Daniel On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Francis De Brabandere

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

Sebastian, btw, I noticed that the JNLP app remains open after you closed the browser. That's probably because the main browser app and the JNLP app are not tightly coupled if it comes to even notivication such as a browser close even (it's been a will since I did Java webstart apps the last time

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

916 562 8095 On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:20 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, please find my feedback below: OS X Lion: * tested with: ** Firefox 5.0.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3 ** Safari 5.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3 * Observations: ** Openmeetings did not work

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

Hi, please find my feedback below: OS X Lion: * tested with: ** Firefox 5.0.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3 ** Safari 5.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3 * Observations: ** Openmeetings did not work with Firefox/Safari if using a webcam/mic cause on the adobe flash player settings dialog it was not

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

, 2011 at 8:20 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, please find my feedback below: OS X Lion: * tested with: ** Firefox 5.0.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3 ** Safari 5.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3 * Observations: ** Openmeetings did not work with Firefox/Safari if using a webcam

Re: Policy on t-shirts for incubating projects

Only mankinis are allowed. Look that up on Google :) Cheers Daniel On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: What's the policy on making t-shirts for an incubating project? Regards, Alan

Re: [PROPOSAL] Kafka for the Apache Incubator

I guess the official proposal is here, right? - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KafkaProposal Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Chris Burroughs chris.burrou...@gmail.com wrote: Clearspring was persuaded by the excellent design document [1] to adopt Kafka for some of our recent

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

Btw, your mails appear to be sent twice to the ML. I recognized that before already... Cheers Daniel On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: Sorry, this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting, please. regards, Mathias On

Re: What is Champion?

Hi Kazunari, that's an explanation of the role Champion as it can be found at the Apache incubator proposal guide [1]: The Champion is a person already associated with Apache who leads the proposal process. It is common - but not necessary - for the Champion to also be proposed as a Mentor. A

Re: Request: Can proposed committers introduce themselves?

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: A sufficiently complex business application based on OpenOffice is going to involve document manipulations at both tiers.  For example, we recently (at IBM) made an insurance solution that involved using Symphony, extended with a

Re: Dcument automation with ODF (was Re: Request: Can proposed committers introduce themselves?)

...@us.ibm.com wrote: dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/08/2011 12:15:52 PM: Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and make those formats look consistent with what you would get

Re: Legal concern: Are we getting to close ot a division of markets conversation?

I guess if I get it correct the point in here is that most of us are legal layman and thus it's not necessarily efficient if we try to sort out legal concerns on our own. Instead this is supposed to be IP and patent attorney business from my PoV. If assistance in this regards is required it might

Re: OO.o and web widgets

The only widget's I used with Lotus Symphony are widgets similar to [1]. Not sure whether it would be possible to use iWidgets originating from Lotus Mashups or even OpenSocial Gadgets in a similar way like they could be consumed by Rational Team Concert [2]. [1]

Re: OpenOffice.org: Question to IBM regarding license of Lotus Symphony

Andreas, On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote: I also notice that IBM currently does not sell Lotus Symphony but makes binaries available for free: http://www.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony Although you can download IBM Lotus Symphony for free it is

Re: Apache OpenOffice.org Incubator Proposal: Collaboration with TDF/LO

Rob, I think being more open concerning collaboration can't hurt what do you think? So it would be nice if the proposal could be open and diplomatic in this regards. Probably the intention should be to not shut the door in the very beginning and thus omit collaboration with other parties. Tho,

Re: Apache OpenOffice.org Incubator Proposal: Collaboration with TDF/LO

+1 (I like the positive tone that tries to omit words having a negative connotation) Cheers Daniel On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: I suggest: The LibreOffice project is an important partner in the OpenOffice.org community, with an established

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal

it in the quoted sections. It happens Cheers, -g On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 18:31, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: Again, to me means to me as in it's my personal opinion and nothing else. How could I be somebody defining the rules? I suspect the rules are all documented anyway. So you

Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines...

in an OSS environment and is probably counter productive and it's probably a dead end in a commercial environment if you want to performance measure people that way. Cheers Daniel On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:05, dsh daniel.hais

Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines...

Sorry no tab keys involved ... I'd like to indent with spaces :D :D Cheers Daniel On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:55 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/02/2011 04:44:26 PM: IMHO the project is on track the community just needs to discuss some more

Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines...

, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote on 06/02/2011 05:45:57 PM: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:55,  robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/02/2011 04:44:26 PM: IMHO the project is on track the community just needs to discuss

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal

To me the proof point whether this proposal will be successful or not is whether Linux distributions having already dropped support for OpenOffice and switched to LibreOffice instead would be willing to reverse that decision and move back to OpenOffice again now that it is in a process to be

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal

Guys, to me means to me as in it's my personal opinion and nothing else. And that opinion of course still stands unchanged. I never wrote anything about requirements especially not in a sense of formal requirements. Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Benson Margulies

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal

Again, to me means to me as in it's my personal opinion and nothing else. How could I be somebody defining the rules? I suspect the rules are all documented anyway. So you did the interpretation of an opinion expressed by somebody else and of course if you treat that opinion as a requirement or a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Howl as an Incubator Project

There as well existed an open source project called Howl in 2005 or so which implemented Zeroconf (Apple calls the commercial incarnation Bonjour). See: http://www.porchdogsoft.com/ - About Howl is available in the FreeBSD ports collection and on SF.NET -

Re: [VOTE] Accept Howl as an Incubator Project

http://www.porchdogsoft.com/ as well provides a Zeroconf implementation called Howl and I am not sure whether Porchdog Software finally got acquired by Apple. The favicon and certain information on the site could make you think Apple did exactly that. Cheers Daniel On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:17

Re: [PROPOSAL] Propose Howl as an Apache Incubator project

There as well exists a Zeroconf implementation called Howl and I am pretty certain that some other projects are using that name too. Cheers Daniel On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: Good catch, but allow me to disagree with you. Howl here is a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation

[X ] +1 Accept Lucene.Net for incubation [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: Cheers Daniel On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote: All, Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan 12th, we now have three mentors

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] EasyAnt incubator

[X] +1 to accept EasyAnt into the Incubator [] 0 don't care [] -1 object and reason why. Cheers Daniel On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote: I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Ant PMC for a new EasyAnt podling.

Re: ManifoldCF - jars should not be stored in SVN

, then the build system can actually mange internal dependancies. Of course checking Jars in to SVN is usually simpler in the short term. ~Michael On Jan 9, 2011, at 4:55 PM, dsh wrote: s/way/idea/ On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I'd suggest

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

+1 (non-binding) Cheers Daniel On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote: Hello all, We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator. The draft proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal (for your convenience, a

Re: [VOTE] Aries Graduation to TLP

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a commnunity we were

Re: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Cheers Daniel On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote: I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is copied here for your