Re: License text needed for dependencies or URL is enough? (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.2.0-incubating (RC1))

2011-01-30 Thread ant elder
The best way to get this clarified would be to ask the the ASF legal folks, http://www.apache.org/legal/, either be emailing legal-disc...@apache.org, or best, raise a JIRA at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL. ...ant On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Gabriele Columbro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

2011-01-20 Thread ant elder
+1 from me. Though a little reluctantly because while it looks mostly good the chemistry-opencmis-client-impl-0.2.0-incubating-with-dependencies.zip does not include the text of all the licenses of the included dependencies it only has URLs to the license text. I thought including the full

Re: [VOTE] Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

2011-01-19 Thread Gabriele Columbro
Hi all, just a reminder for this vote, which is now been open for a full week. On Jan 17, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Nick Burch wrote: Just need one more IPMC +1 and we're done. Anyone able to review and vote? As Nick correctly mentions here, we just need one more IPMC +1 to get this release out.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

2011-01-17 Thread Nick Burch
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Gabriele Columbro wrote: The release has passed the Chemistry PMC vote: http://bit.ly/i0qwI0 During the vote, also 1 IPMC (Jukka Zitting) vote has been collected, so we'd need 2 more IPMC +1 to proceed with the release. Appologies for not having the time to review it

[VOTE] Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.2.0-incubating (RC1)

2011-01-12 Thread Gabriele Columbro
Dear Incubator PMC members, on behalf of the Chemistry dev team, I'd like to ask your approval to release the RC1 packages as Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.2.0-incubating. The release has passed the Chemistry PMC vote: http://bit.ly/i0qwI0 During the vote, also 1 IPMC (Jukka Zitting) vote has been