> like a google.com for example.
I meant gmail.com but slack rejects this and others like it (yahoo, hotmail
...).
-r
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:13 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> > This is the link to signup to slack for this project
> http://openwhisk.apache.org/slack.html
> Yep I noted that in my email, but they would need to search for it. It
> would be good if the slack login page linked to that.
>
I don't see
Hi,
> This is the link to signup to slack for this project
> http://openwhisk.apache.org/slack.html
Yep I noted that in my email, but they would need to search for it. It would be
good if the slack login page linked to that.
Thanks,
Justin
This is the link to signup to slack for this project
http://openwhisk.apache.org/slack.html
-r
> On Jun 16, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> There's a bit of discussion that can happen (and sometimes does) on
>> the issue trackers which provide a bit more interactive yet
The link to slack contains the content I wrote in the issue. We digest the
slack conversations every night and email them to the dev list so that I could
have used a ponymail permalink instead.
Anyone can self signup for slack there are no approvals or prohibitions on who
can sign up. We
Hi,
> There's a bit of discussion that can happen (and sometimes does) on
> the issue trackers which provide a bit more interactive yet
> asynchronous method of communication. The Slack activity is almost
> comparable to general chit chat at ApacheCon hackathons or similar.
That may be so but
Hi,
> Thanks. The draft at [1] is quite helpful. I've searched for something
> like that multiple times over the last year and never found it. Is this
> new or is my search karma not good ;)
It was discussed at length on this list about 6 month ago (think), people from
the legal committee
Justin Mclean wrote on 06/10/2019 06:08:34 PM:
>
> > 1. CI/CD. We have automation (Jenkins/TravisCI) that automatically
> > publishes images to dockerhub from the master branch of many of our git
> > repos. These images are all tagged with git commit hash style tags.
The
> > 'latest' tag is
Hi,
> 1. CI/CD. We have automation (Jenkins/TravisCI) that automatically
> publishes images to dockerhub from the master branch of many of our git
> repos. These images are all tagged with git commit hash style tags. The
> 'latest' tag is always an alias to the most recent of these CI/CD tags.
Hi -
The ASF expects that PMCs will watch out for their project and product brands.
The VP, Brand and their committee are available to help with advice and also
trademark registrations via the tradema...@apache.org mailing list.
My only concern with the README.md files in some Github project
Justin Mclean wrote on 06/09/2019 09:37:47 AM:
>
> Hopefully someone else can provide some insight with what going on
> with docker.
I can try :) The project's usage pattern has evolved during incubation.
Here's what I think OpenWhisk is currently doing with dockerhub.
1. CI/CD. We have
For my part (and OBO IBM), have gone out of my way to transfer worldwide
trademarks (and domain names, including openwhisk,org) to the ASF working with
our IP and legal teams and caused a complete product rename as we entered
Incubation. There is no intentional use of OpenWhisk, any that
Hi,
> I conclude that all are left over from before the project entered the Apache
> Incubator and the period of transition that followed.
I though that was the case bur was just checking. But beauty IBM need to be
respectful of the trademark and the (P)PMC make sure they do that.
> The
Thanks for these links. I went through many of the links you provided and
conducted my own search as well. I conclude that all are left over from
before the project entered the Apache Incubator and the period of
transition that followed. We addressed the use of IBM OpenWhisk and Bluemix
OpenWhisk
> I also note that you’ve been given feedback on several releases that have
> had mirror issue, but the issues don’t seem to have been fixed. Is there a
> plan to do so before graduation? e.g
>
Hi,
Some of the answer be be obvious here to someone who works on the project, and
already been discussed and sorted on your mailing list. So apologies if that
the case, I’m not involved with your project, so I’m just asking to get clarity.
A google search turns up mention of “IBM OpenWhisk”
Hi,
I also note that you’ve been given feedback on several releases that have had
mirror issue, but the issues don’t seem to have been fixed. Is there a plan to
do so before graduation? e.g [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1.
I have a question below.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 7, 2019, at 6:37 PM, Rodric Rabbah wrote:
>
> The PMC has individuals from 6 unrelated companies. I think committers add
> another 2 unrelated companies/entities. We expect to welcome new committers
> after graduation.
>
> -r
>
>> On
The PMC has individuals from 6 unrelated companies. I think committers add
another 2 unrelated companies/entities. We expect to welcome new committers
after graduation.
-r
> On Jun 7, 2019, at 8:25 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have looked at the contributor distributions as
Hi,
> I have looked at the contributor distributions as follows:
>
> - 91 individuals with 1 commit.
> - 24 individuals with 2 commits.
> - 9 individuals with 3 commits.
> - 16 individuals with 4 commits.
> - 30 individuals with 5 or more commits (and fewer than 10).
> - 22 individuals with 10
There's a bit of discussion that can happen (and sometimes does) on
the issue trackers which provide a bit more interactive yet
asynchronous method of communication. The Slack activity is almost
comparable to general chit chat at ApacheCon hackathons or similar.
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 11:36,
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:36 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...I don't have a diversity profile per employer. I can try to gather that. Do
> you have a suggestion for the easiest way to do this? Maybe infra has some
> tools?...
Note that the ASF doesn't require people to disclose their company or
Hi Justin, thanks for your email.
I have looked at the contributor distributions as follows:
- 91 individuals with 1 commit.
- 24 individuals with 2 commits.
- 9 individuals with 3 commits.
- 16 individuals with 4 commits.
- 30 individuals with 5 or more commits (and fewer than 10).
- 22
Hi,
Congratulations. That’s pne of the most comprehensive maturity reports I’ve
seen.
I would be interested is seeing some details of:
- Diversity of current committers in who they work for
- Same for the proposed PMC (if that's been decided?)
- There seems to be a heavy reliance on
This email is to notify general@i.a.o that a graduation community
[VOTE] is in progress for Apache OpenWhisk (incubating).
-r
-- Forwarded message -
From: Rodric Rabbah
Date: Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:25 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project
To:
Hi
25 matches
Mail list logo
