Actually this raises an interesting discussion about the Incubator PMC.
There is kind of a tricky role for Incubator PMC members. Because most
of us have no knowledge or affiliation with any given one of the tens
of incubator projects, we find it hard to have any say, especially
when it comes to
On 7/5/06, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually this raises an interesting discussion about the Incubator PMC.
There is kind of a tricky role for Incubator PMC members. Because most
of us have no knowledge or affiliation with any given one of the tens
of incubator projects, we find
A couple of points in relation to the discussion.
Firstly I'd like to make it clear I do not condone any blind +1ing.
I don't think anyone on this list does. In fact exactly the opposite.
The aim of this discussion was to come up with ways to ensure that
projects have people willing to do the
On 7/5/06, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I take your point about Yet Another Role. On the other hand it takes 3
binding +1s to do a release, and projects typically have only one
mentor. It seems to me that a few people like you Robert take on a
large part of the burden of doing
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 07:08:48PM +0100, ant elder wrote:
A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes.
Huh what? Exactly what semantics attach to a +1 is always a muddy
discussion, but IMNSHO they really ought not be thanks for something
unrelated. Its utterly confusing.
Shesh...what makes you think it was done lightly? As the rest of my post
indicated I'd taken the time to downloaded and try out their release, even
pointed out a problem in the readme files I'd found. And I'd looked at
things like the notice and license files that have cased problems in other
On 7/1/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 looks ok to me
but note:
1 the various licenses for the jars shipped are present and rationally
organized (good) but are not referenced from the master LICENSE file.
check
with
On 7/2/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/1/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 looks ok to me
but note:
1 the various licenses for the jars shipped are present and rationally
organized (good)
A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes.
FYI, the README.txt files in each example in the examples folder have
incorrect URLs to the website example pages. Eg,
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/Basic should be
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/basic.html. Other
+1 from me.
On 6/29/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/25/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ServiceMix community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
3.0-M2.
We would now like to
On 6/29/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 looks ok to me
but note:
1 the various licenses for the jars shipped are present and rationally
organized (good) but are not referenced from the master LICENSE file. check
with the legal policy documentation once (it is posted)
On 6/25/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ServiceMix community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
3.0-M2.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
Vote
+1
On 6/26/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 25 Jun 06, at 8:16 PM 25 Jun 06, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ServiceMix community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
3.0-M2.
We would now like to request
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ServiceMix community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
3.0-M2.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
Vote thread:
+1
On 25 Jun 06, at 8:16 PM 25 Jun 06, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ServiceMix community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
3.0-M2.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the
15 matches
Mail list logo
