[RESULT][VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

(sorry if you get this twice - I sent the original from an unsubscribed email address) Thanks everyone for your input and guidance in getting Wink 1.1 released! I appreciate your help! The vote is successful with the following binding +1 IPMC votes: Davanum Srinivas +1 Kevan Miller +1 Ant

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

Thanks everyone for your input and guidance in getting Wink 1.1 released! I appreciate your help! The vote is successful with the following binding +1 IPMC votes: Davanum Srinivas +1 Kevan Miller +1 Ant Elder +1 There were 0 neutral and 0 negative votes. I'll send out the official

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

Looks ok to me, +1 ...ant On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote: I should have mentioned this, Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from: Davanum Srinivas Kevan Miller Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass.

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

Thanks Sebb, Just to be clear, is this a minus 1 vote from you? If so, I'll roll it all back and restart the process. mike On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote: IPMCers, Wink 1.1 release voting has

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@ohmyhead.com wrote: Thanks Sebb, Just to be clear, is this a minus 1 vote from you? If so, I'll roll it all back and restart the process. The missing AL headers would have been -1 from me, but as they cannot currently be fixed that can be left for a

[VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

IPMCers, Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list. I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the process indicated here: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote The Maven staging area

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

I should have mentioned this, Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from: Davanum Srinivas Kevan Miller Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass. Thanks. mike On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote: IPMCers, Wink 1.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote: IPMCers, Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list. I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the process indicated here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

Just tried building the source archive using mvn install. This reports a lot of warnings from the license:check goal. Seems unnecessary to include a license check in every build; it should probably be run as part of the site generation - if it is run automatically at all. Also, I got a test

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

Thanks Sebb for your review, I'll try to address each of your concerns: 1) AL headers are missing from... These files list implementation classes like other standard META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and re-write code that reads these files in the next release but I

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote: Thanks Sebb for your review, I'll try to address each of your concerns: 1) AL headers are missing from... These files list implementation classes like other standard META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

Sebb, Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in wink-common/src/main/

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On May 11, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in wink-common/src/main/

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote: Sebb, Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 12/05/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote: Sebb, Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just confirmed it again in my build;