Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

I don’t really know the answer to that. Ralph > On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:35 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Montag, 10. April 2017 um 01:12 schrieben Sie: > >> Yes, please go ahead. > > What happens to the former GIT mirror on GitHub? Should

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Montag, 10. April 2017 um 01:12 schrieben Sie: > Yes, please go ahead. What happens to the former GIT mirror on GitHub? Should it be deactivated/deleted? 2 of the 3 PRs there have already been applied in the past and I asked the author of the most current third one to

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Yes, please go ahead. Ralph > On Apr 9, 2017, at 3:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Ralph, > > It looks like most everything is done. If you don't get to it, I'll update > the podlings.xml and content/projects/log4cxx2.xml file to reflect graduation > status. > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Ralph, It looks like most everything is done. If you don't get to it, I'll update the podlings.xml and content/projects/log4cxx2.xml file to reflect graduation status. John On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:10 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > Thanks for the info Greg! > > Ralph > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Thanks for the info Greg! Ralph > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning > wrote: > >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn to git without losing history. I guess I will just create > > a Jira issue for infra and find out. > > From my understanding, a logging PMC

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Donnerstag, 6. April 2017 um 07:10 schrieben Sie: > No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move > to git or not "We" want, as nobody objected in the discussion and Matts description of how to deal with GitHub PRs sounds very promising. > and I am

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

I figured out how to see the issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13651 . It seems it is in a status of waiting for user but the reporter has no way to kick it back to infra. It has been sitting there for over a week. Ralph

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move to git or not and I am not quite sure what the process is to move from svn to git without losing history. I guess I will just create a Jira issue for infra and find out. Also we have an outstanding infra request to combine all

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Ralph, Have you completed the process? I see log4cxx is still listed as active in the incubator records. John On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:45 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > This vote has been open for more than 5 days. It received 5 +1 votes and > no other votes. So we

[RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

This vote has been open for more than 5 days. It received 5 +1 votes and no other votes. So we will begin the process of moving the project back to Logging Services. Ralph > On Mar 11, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

+1 looks like a good solution to a sticky problem. Craig > On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2013 several > users became frustrated that they were submitting patches but there were

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Since Thorsten confirmed, please feel free to consider my vote a +1. On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:57 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > There was a discussion on the log4cxx list on March 1st and 2nd so > Thorsten is aware. He also accepted the invite to be a Logging Services >

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

+1 Regards Felix > Am 11.03.2017 um 09:31 schrieb Ralph Goers : > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2013 several > users became frustrated that they were submitting patches but there were no > committers who could apply them. The

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

+1 Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > There was a discussion on the log4cxx list on March

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

There was a discussion on the log4cxx list on March 1st and 2nd so Thorsten is aware. He also accepted the invite to be a Logging Services committer. Yes, the vote had to happen on the private list. The Logging PMC is looking at ways to correct that. Here is my +1 Ralph > On Mar 11, 2017, at

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

That link doesn't work for me (its a logging PMC only link). I'm worried about the vote happening in private but think I understand why. Here's a valid link to the vote thread:

[VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2013 several users became frustrated that they were submitting patches but there were no committers who could apply them. The Logging Services PMC was not comfortable making them committers as that would have given them commit