Sorry Dave.
I saw (part of) the subject and saw lots of people saying +1.
It was my error for not noticing the other part of the subject line (the
part about Re:) and for not reading more than the first lines of your email
carefully.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com
There is no VOTE in progress.
We voted to graduate on the Usergrid dev list, I forwarded the results of
the vote to this list and added a draft TLP resolution for review. As I
said when I forwarded the email, I will will call for an IPMC vote shortly.
Why are certain mentors left out of this resolution while others are put
on the new PMC without any discussion anywhere about this?
I'd very much like an answer or a change to the resolution text.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-08-07 17:19, Dave wrote:
The Usergrid podling has voted to proceed
The Usergrid podling has voted to proceed with graduation. Below is the
proposed TLP resolution for your review. I will be calling for an IPMC
gradation vote on this shortly.
Apache Usergrid top-level project resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
I believe the reasoning is that some mentors want to move forward with the
Usergrid TLP, while others were around to help with incubation only. Its
been typical for a podling to not graduate with all mentors in toe.
John
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:55 AM Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/07/2015 06:44 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
I believe the reasoning is that some mentors want to move forward with the
Usergrid TLP, while others were around to help with incubation only. Its
been typical for a podling to not graduate with all mentors in toe.
John
Right, but why was it not
Hey John
Sorry, just getting back from vacation and catching up on email. That would
be fine and make sense if that had been part of the discussion on list
leading up to the vote, but from what I can see that did not occur. Can you
provide a link to the thread where that was decided please
-Jake
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it is too late to add back anybody that I left out before we
start the IPMC vote. What do you think?
It's not too late. The text of the resolution is a recommendation to
the Board, and the Board has the option to
Daniel and Jake,
I created the list in the resolution and I'm the one of left out some
mentors. That my fault. I wrongly assumed that some mentors were just there
to be mentors and had no intention of staying with the project. I did share
the resolution before we started voting on the Usergrid
On 08/07/2015 07:37 PM, Dave wrote:
Daniel and Jake,
I created the list in the resolution and I'm the one of left out some
mentors. That my fault. I wrongly assumed that some mentors were just there
to be mentors and had no intention of staying with the project. I did share
the resolution
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
However, please do not change the text of any VOTE (graduation, entry
into incubation, release approval, anything...) while it is underway.
That retroactively changes the meaning of votes already cast, which is
Below is a revised TLP resolution for Usergrid for review. I added to the
list our mentors Jim J and Jake F. I believe the list is complete now.
Also, I removed the below paragraph, which is unnecessary and only exists
because I copied some other project's resolution. We don't need special
12 matches
Mail list logo
