+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
Ditto!
On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
+1 (non-binding)
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1 (non-binding)
-Original Message-
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:and...@objectstyle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 1:54 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
+1
2011/11/8 enterdv ente...@gmail.com:
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:01 PM, solomax solomax...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org
wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
group of developers behind
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to
[ x ] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
This is a great and unique project. Glad to see it here.
+1.
Bruno.
On 08/11/2011, at 04:53, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the
+1
On 7 November 2011 22:53, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
+1
-- dims
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
+1
On 7 November 2011 22:53, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and
+1
Ate
On 11/07/2011 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They
even went
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/08/2011 10:41 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
+1
Ate
On 11/07/2011 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
group of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address
all potential obstacles to the Incubator
+1, definitely.
Deepal
+1
On 7 November 2011 22:53, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance
On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
+1
Yegor
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to
24 matches
Mail list logo
