On Apr 11, 2012, at 10:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/11/2012 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
It should be noted though that even though the /dist/incubator/ooo
space was used to distribute these patches, they were and are not
officially blessed by the Incubator PMC on behalf of the
On 12 April 2012 06:43, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/11/2012 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
...
As chair, you should have been brought into this loop, but with the
change from Noel I can see how this oversight happened. Sorry about
that. It's probably another example
On 12 April 2012 07:48, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
Sorry, I can't remain mute, but I offended anyone, sorry, but this was
wrongly done. I don't know a better way
As one of the inner circle I am not offended. All your points are
valid. Thank you for sharing them.
This
Dave Fisher wrote on Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 23:48:05 -0700:
Sorry, I can't remain mute, but I offended anyone, sorry, but this was
wrongly done. I don't know a better way
What about expanding the membership of ooo-security@? Currently it has
less than 10 subscribers.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 07:48, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
Sorry, I can't remain mute, but I offended anyone, sorry, but this was
wrongly done. I don't know a better way
As one of the inner
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 09:27, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 08:59, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
+1 from me (binding).
Karl
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6.
This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection.
You can download the release candidate
+1 (binding),
Tommaso
2012/4/12 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
+1 from me (binding).
Karl
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6.
This RC has passed our podling
ping
We still need one vote here.
Anyone willing to take a look at LARQ RC-1?
http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
Thanks,
Paolo
Paolo Castagna wrote:
Thank you Leo, thank you Benson.
We still need one vote, I think...
Cheers,
Paolo
Leo Simons wrote:
On Sun,
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Short of people.a.o/~luser/my-patch.tgz, I'm fairly certain that
can't happen with an incubating podling. Everything under the space
/dist/ must exist under a PMC.
I totally agree for proper releases (with a
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Kevin Kluge kevin.kl...@citrix.com wrote:
I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
PS. Unless you've already done so, please get in touch with the ASF
infra team as soon as possible on the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Short of people.a.o/~luser/my-patch.tgz, I'm fairly certain that
can't happen with an incubating podling. Everything under the
On 12 April 2012 15:05, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'd recommend that future podlings, and the IPMC, consider this aspect
when reviewing new podling applications. It should probably be
treated explicitly in the wiki proposal for podlings that expect to
take more than 3 or 4 months to
On 04/12/2012 07:33 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
ping
We still need one vote here.
Anyone willing to take a look at LARQ RC-1?
http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
Thanks,
Paolo
+1 binding
-
To
/me wondering if any of this feedback ever got channeled back to
security@? (or was it only on @incubator lists)
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 15:07:56 +0200:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Short of
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looking at the report and recent project activity it looks like Giraph
is doing pretty well. In fact I can't spot any obvious graduation
I don't think the problem is with the size of the ooo-security list membership.
I think it is in the assumption that the [P]PMC has somehow delegated the
ability to make a release of any kind to the ooo-security team. I don't mean
slip-streaming fixes and working off the public SVN until that
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I don't think the problem is with the size of the ooo-security list
membership. I think it is in the assumption that the [P]PMC has somehow
delegated the ability to make a release of any kind to the
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Kitty!
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
+ In order to get graduated, Kitty needs the following features:
+ 1) The ability to save profiles of commonly connected to jmx servers
including groups of tomcat servers
+ 2) The
On 4/12/2012 2:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 07:48, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
Sorry, I can't remain mute, but I offended anyone, sorry, but this was
wrongly done. I don't know a
@Rob,
In fact, I posted to ooo-dev and ooo-users information on the significance of
the vulnerability and ways to mitigate it.
I was unsuccessful in posting instructions, after several failed attempts, for
applying the patch on Windows XP where the dialogs are different and have
different
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
@Rob,
In fact, I posted to ooo-dev and ooo-users information on the significance of
the vulnerability and ways to mitigate it.
Yes, after the official security bulletin went out to those same lists. Thanks.
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
- at least the IPMC chair should be involved, if not the whole IPMC
That can be remedied today. Jukka, if you like, please join the ASF
wide security team, at minimum as an observer.
Thanks, but I'd rather
On 4/12/2012 2:37 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote on Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 23:48:05 -0700:
Sorry, I can't remain mute, but I offended anyone, sorry, but this was
wrongly done. I don't know a better way
What about expanding the membership of ooo-security@? Currently it has
Yes, this was already raised on the PPMC (on March 22) as you know. It seems
to me that the PPMC is not concerned.
It is interesting that it is thought, here, that the remedy is to add more
ooo-security subscribers from the PPMC. That had not come up before.
- Dennis
-Original
Hi Jukka,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Any23!
No hassle, thank you for taking the time to criticize the report we are
working to make Any23 a more appealing project and the more we can do to
make reporting clearer,
On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Yes, this was already raised on the PPMC (on March 22) as you know. It seems
to me that the PPMC is not concerned.
It is interesting that it is thought, here, that the remedy is to add more
ooo-security subscribers from the PPMC.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Yes, this was already raised on the PPMC (on March 22) as you know. It
seems to me that the PPMC is not concerned.
It is interesting that it is thought, here,
On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Yes, this was already raised on the PPMC (on March 22) as you know. It
seems to me that the PPMC is not
On 12 April 2012 22:20, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
Normally a podling will set the PMC as part the graduation resolution.
Perhaps the AOO PPMC membership needs to be revised sooner. Any advice?
...
I
On 4/12/12 3:35 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I should also mention that Jukka voted +1 during the community voting
on this RC, so his vote should be binding here as well.
For future reference, it is a best practice to include a link to the PPMC
VOTE thread [1]. It has also been
caofyjnysuhk+g0rcppq2r4hbndo2hf6lxpo8xz12gg9rzh1...@mail.gmail.com
Karl
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
On 4/12/12 3:35 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I should also mention that Jukka voted +1 during the community voting
on this RC,
32 matches
Mail list logo
