On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
... We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
Alan,
It's unfortunate that the vote only took 24 hours on the Kafka list; it
was my understanding that votes take 72 hours.
Because the only change was in the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
When the hot air manufacturers start ragging on us, one of the usual
tags that they paint is 'rules' and 'bureaucracy'. If you read
general@, you will see a fairly regular occurrence that feeds this
perception.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 24 November 2011 17:17, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I had hoped that the business of a PPMC-member champion being a VP-elect
would have just gone away. That coupling is certain to inspire
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
based on recent traffic here.
LOL
Unfortunately, that conversation left me
with a giant headache and no clear idea.
The issue is that there's
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
Alan,
It's unfortunate that the vote
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Not as frustrating as putting up a release candidate which twists in the wind
for weeks waiting for a IPMC member to review because Mentors are awol! The
few individuals who do this thankless work on a regular
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Can anybody please point me to the result of the conversation that
defines our current understanding of what goes into NOTICE and what
doesn't so I don't give bad advice to podlings? I'm pretty sure this
must have
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 1:07 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2011 20:11, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
And while we are at
l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
based on recent traffic here.
LOL
Unfortunately
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Apache members,
Over the past 2 months, the Kafka Apache incubator project has been trying
to release its very first version in Apache. After 7 RCs, we are still not
done. Part of this is because most of us are new to the
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 22:25, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
But if the team already agrees that the changes need to be made, why
not do so and re-roll?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The context for this is the discussion here -
http://markmail.org/message/rsxjgrrufc6khlqy?q=overhead+list:org.apache.incubator.general
This was a long discussion with no clear answers.
We would like to know
Looks ok to me, and good job on all the wrangling and work on the
source release.
...ant
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
In preparation [1] of a vote to propose that the IPMC recommends this
resolution to the board, I am posting the
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sam,
Rather than argue about the existence and interpretation of
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:11 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 January 2012 21:04, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
and binding
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no fork in the current plan, so this discussion is moot anyways.
There have been tons of long emails on this proposal and i haven't
read them all so am a little lost on whats going on, but
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
The VOTE was based on misleading information. The Incubator PMC should
declare it
void and request a new proposal. The existing Bloodhound podling should be
placed on hold until this is sorted out.
What is the status
I like the idea of mentors being expected to signoff on the wiki just
to show that they are paying attention, but i also agree that it might
be useful to have along with the poddling reports to have comments
from the mentors. So how about doing both? Just extend the mentor
signoff section to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Let's stop discussing this issue in the abstract then and take
a look at the current set of reports. Of the ones with signatures
of mentors,
I'm not sure looking at signatures on past reports is going to be
useful.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
I hate the fact that these discussions continue to happen in a vacuum
devoid of any grasp of the reality that mentors typically don't do
a fucking thing for their podlings. No they don't discuss reports
on list, nor
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It IS lame because we've been beating that dead horse for over a year now
without any changes taking place.
What changes would you like to see?
Even if we did require all mentors to sign the reports to indicate
they're
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
And here we return to a thread of some weeks ago. One chair can't
review all those reports and push the bounce buttons. Some other
people
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Let's stop discussing this issue in the abstract
Good idea. Lets be more specific, and put together something actionable.
I'm +1 on this too. I think its the easiest way to get close to what
Niclas was just suggesting of having only a single responsible mentor
but avoids all the debates about changing the number mentors.
...ant
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
+1
I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
+1
but i think you should do a complete
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Clerezza 0.2 is ready for release. This will be our first incubator release.
We had a preliminary vote in the PPMC, which has been accepted, the +1
votes include the one from IPMC member Tommaso Teofili.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Sam,
My personal perspective is that incubation shouldn't generally take more
than a year.
The problem is with small communities. What do you
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Now to go back and answer Ant's question directly,
Sam, what you replied doesn't really answer my question directly. The
issue with the long term poddlings which I know about is not that
their reports are not read, they are
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is good that someone finally explained their opinion of
a mentor's responsibility to the IPMC out in the open. Let
me disagree with you that mentors are not supposed to be put
in the position of judging whether or
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Projects like PDFBox
or River are living examples of how active mentoring can turn around
the fortunes of a project.
I'm sure the mentoring was ace but a large amount of why River turned
around was down to its
...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Actively retiring projects
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
wrote
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
+1
Excessive snippage violation.
Voting to terminate a
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:43 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Projects like PDFBox
or River are living examples of how active mentoring can turn around
the fortunes of a project.
I'm sure the mentoring
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 16 January 2012 09:05, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...
ActiveMQ, Cassandra, CXF, Felix, Harmony
Are people seriously suggesting that the ASF would be better off had
we terminated those poddlings
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 16 January 2012 09:31, Robert Burrell Donkin
snip
The right way to discipline Mentors is to remove them from the
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be some people assuming that the IPMC wants to
terminate the Kato podling. Looking back I wonder if my original
status review was the source of this:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
expect are not required. When we last discussed
of the binary release doesn't match the one of the
source release is intended. The source release is a distribution of
many components, the binary release is a release of the launcher which
contains most but not all the components.
Cheers,
Reto
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:00 AM, ant elder ant.el
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
I doubt writing some more documentation on
some webpage about
that the some modules contain additional license and notice
files.
Cheers,
Reto
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:10 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
The issue is that ASF release artifacts should have in their root a
LICENSE file which includes all the licensing details of the artifact
I don't think so, and someone asked this a while back and didn't get an answer.
As an alternative, you could send a [NOTICE] type email to general@
which all poddlings are supposed to be watching. Thats likely to get
lost in the flood of other messages so what we could do is set up a
new dev list
/1/19 ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
I don't think so, and someone asked this a while back and didn't get an
answer.
As an alternative, you could send a [NOTICE] type email to general@
which all poddlings are supposed to be watching. Thats likely to get
lost in the flood of other messages so
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 19 January 2012 08:48, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
We have p...@apache.org for project PMCs, is there an equivalent for
podlings?
As others have said there isn't once, but unlike others
+1
Same comment on the NOTICE file as over here:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/hlfebouyg3r5w27i
...ant
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
regards,
Eric
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, William
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
m...@farewellutopia.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org
wrote:
...The reason the license files is not at the
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
m...@farewellutopia.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:55 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
m...@farewellutopia.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
Looks good to me, +1
...ant
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
OK, I switch my
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-01-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release.
This is very similar to our release at the end of November, however we
have used generics where appropriate to give it a better feel for
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any other rational opinions?
I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 5:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
OK. With this and the script, I guess you would say that patches are
welcome ;-)
If someone would point me to the
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding +1 in
the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE and
license files. Also the source distribution contained the
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
One thing I would like to be bantered about:
Long ago, it was customary to have a single mentor for a podling.
Nowadays, the feelings are the more, the merrier.
Has the above been an experiment which succeeded, failed or
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a deep
breath and allow room to digest and contemplate the various issues
that have led to a bumper crop of email. These are complex questions,
and even if
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Pain point 1: Podlings have to beg for binding votes for new committers. If
mentors are required to vote on new committers for their podlings, there are
three binding votes and the subsequent incubator pmc vote is
+1 on what Jukka said.
...ant
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Martin van den Bemt mll...@mvdb.net wrote:
+1
Mvgr,
Martin
2012/2/5 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I find it unfortunate that the PMC chair nominations got turned into a
debate about the future of the
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this
page), but the release FAQ [1
I had a look and it all looks good, +1. Sorry you had to wait so long for votes.
...ant
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Paul Fremantle pzf...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes its fine to leave it open. Any other incubator PMC members willing to
jump in?
Paul
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Michael
Looks ok to me, +1
...ant
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This RC7 has passed the Hama PMC vote as follows (*, ** marks an PMC,
IPMC vote) :
+1 Thomas Jungblut *
+1 Edward J. Yoon *
+1 Tommaso Teofili **
+1 ChiaHung Lin *
+1 Steve
Looks good to me, +1
...ant
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Michael Stroucken mxs+apa...@cmu.edu wrote:
Hi,
The Tashi project is excited to ask the incubator for approval to make our
second release.
The vote passed the project PPMC as follows:-
+1 (binding) * 3: Michael (PPMC), Richard
+1
...ant
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
this release.
--
Main changes from RC-4:
+
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
While there was no clear single message, the overall
impression I got was that the board expects the Incubator PMC to
provide better and more active oversight on podlings.
And that seems understandable, however IMHO
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Billie J Rinaldi
billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 11:27:54 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Billie J Rinaldi
billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
... RESOLVED, that the persons
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
I'm a little puzzled by the lack of response here. No one's objecting,
but not much of anyone's voting +1, either. The board meeting looms.
Not that it would be the end of the world if it takes another
+1
...ant
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
rdon...@apache.org wrote:
As recommended[1]:
* the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as the
Apache Creadur Project
* the proposed charter has been reviewed[3]
The penultimate stage is this
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Our mentor(s) are pushing strongly for a source release (which
contains the upstream patches), plus a lib release, which is to be
overlaid on
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 07:48, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
Sorry, I can't remain mute, but I offended anyone, sorry, but this was
wrongly done. I don't know a better way
As one of the inner
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 09:27, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 08:59, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
With that background, here are my results for the first batch of six
podlings (more to come over the next few days):
Next five
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:11 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still watching Nuvem and reading all the emails, there hasn't been
anything recently that I've felt the need to jump in.
OK, great
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:46 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Or just ask.
Yes, that's fine as well.
As Ross said, it's a bit easier for reviews like this one if the
information is already out
like this was the latest word on the subject:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 8:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
...talks had halted as one member has not agreed to proceed with
graduation... thats a little harsh, I just questioned the level of
activity and said it would be an easier decision if Wink was more
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
The three listed mentors don't have time to deal with this. I'm told
that Joe volunteered to help out here.
I'm one
On 6/14/12, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@rabellino.it wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than
moving to the Attic?
Well, let's try to solve this once and for all. Sure, Kato is not a
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012 8:46 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/14/12, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@rabellino.it wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Kato is not an ASF project (yet
+1
Thanks Benson.
...ant
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podling.
I'm not sure how long a vote for this should remain open.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there already a community in terms of a group of people who drive
this forward and who are willing to continue? Or is this a
I note the issues mention by Sebb but I'm giving this a +1.
Both JQuery and bootstrap are included in the source release so they need
to be mentioned in the LICENSE file and they are so thats correct. No one
ever seems that sure about when and what to mention in the NOTICE file,
those two are
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
HI Alexei,
It seems that you have sent various requests in advance of this one through
channels other than general@. This is not appreciated by busy people who do
read general@.
Please have patience, the Incubator
Looks good to me
+1
...ant
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/23/2012 10:44 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
On 07/09/2012 11:19 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
A 0.2.0-incubating release candidate has been created. This will be the
second release
Hi Benson, AFAIK all the IP clearance was done, Kato has also done a
release which presumably wouldn't have been possible if the clearance
wasn't complete. So all the source in SVN should be retained right?
..ant
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Benson, AFAIK all the IP clearance was done, Kato has also done a
release which presumably wouldn't have been possible if the clearance
wasn't complete. So all the source in SVN should be retained right?
Ant
+1
...ant
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP.
We began incubation in October 2011 and have demonstrated our ability
to function according to the Apache Way. We've successfully
I've had a quick look and it mostly looks fine to me except in the source
distribution it contains jquery and codemirror .js files but i couldn't see
any mention of their licenses anywhere. Sorry if i've just missed that but
otherwise i think the src distro top level LICENSE file needs to be
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Gary Martin gary.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
particular
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Let me add one more point on adding dependencies to source releases.
In addition to license, the dependence contain copyright statements,
e.g. # Copyright (C) 2005 Christopher Lenz cml...@gmx.de.
As
-1
In the vote on their dev list there wasn't unanimous support for retiring
the project, that should be sorted out first before forcibly retiring them
and while there are still people who want to give it a go to try to make it
work.
...ant
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Alan Cabrera
Great to hear, one month seemed too short to accomplish so much. I'd be
happy to volunteer as another mentor if some fresh eyes will help.
...ant
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
If we decide to give the podling another chance I would prefer to give
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
If people who -1 the retirement agree to mentor Chukwa to give it
another chance, like you seem to be ready to do, I have no
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
One interesting point about consensus decision-making process is the
need to define the starting point. The process assumes that there is a
clear 'status quo', and that a consensus is required to change it.
This
Unless there are compelling reason to stop, i.e continuing breaches of
basic ASF polices and principles, then where possible letting a poddling
continue incubation or just graduate seems better to me than making them go
elsewhere. Its not like a small slow problem is chewing up ASF resources,
but
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
I have only one point of discomfort with Ross' writing here.
Ross's position, in this and other messages, seems to me to be that it
a podling can persist indefinitely, so long as (a) it has involved
mentors, and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:24 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...Slow poddlings don't use much ASF resource so aren't a burden...
I disagree: podlings do use mentor's energy - graduating or retiring
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012, Greg Reddin wrote:
...What difference does it make to
the ASF if a project is very small or very slow?...
IMO, as long as there's three or more active PMC members who react
I've already voted +1 for this on the easyant list but +1 again to bring
the vote up again. Still need one more vote please anyone...
...ant
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org
wrote:
This is a call for a vote of the release of EasyAnt
201 - 300 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
