On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:
I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they
vote in
this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
...ant
On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick update
On Jan 31, 2008 5:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and only the PPMC member votes are binding.
The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member votes
are binding.
--- Noel
Now I'm confused. If it says only PMC member votes are binding does that
mean
Dear root,
Please create an id for Giorgio Zoppi on the Tuscany project under
Incubation.
Preferred userid: giorgio or 2nd choice gzoppi
Full name: Giorgio Zoppi
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
repository, and RAT report are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a
The tag for
Should have voted myself, so +1.
Anyone else able to review and vote on this?
...ant
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
artifacts
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i've been a passive subscriber to the tuscany list for quite a while
now and to me, from the lists, it feels like an open community
It's been a while since we discussed this.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4/10/08, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i've been a passive subscriber
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/model/SDO.mdl
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:35 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file
(search for Apache Tuscany SDO for Java
Passed with +1s from Matthieu, Paul, and me.
Thanks for the reviews everyone.
...ant
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
artifacts
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a discussion going on Tuscany dev list whether the SDO part of
the community would like to join the new project in the event it will
get approved in incubation. Once there is a consensus, Kelvin will
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.1-incubating
release of the Java SDO project.
Service Data Objects (SDO) are designed to simplify and unify the way
in which applications handle data. Using SDO, application programmers
can uniformly access and manipulate data from
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
There is a discussion going on Tuscany dev list whether the SDO part
of
the community would like to join the new project in the event it
will
get approved
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:27 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
That would make the PPMC be about 50% IBM day job and 50% (non IBMers
or
IBM non-day jobers). Can we take it to a private list
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO the emphasis on committer affiliation is misguided. overloading
the word diversity was also probably a mistake. maybe we need to focus
on
Looks ok to me, +1
...ant
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks, just a quick reminder that this vote is still
open. Please vote if you can find the time to look
at our release. Thanks.
--Thilo
Michael Baessler wrote:
The Apache UIMA
The poor UIMA guys have been trying to get this release approved for nearly
two weeks now and it still has just a single vote. Could a couple of other
IPMCers take a look and vote?
...ant
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC -
Thank
+1
...ant
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg30405.html
The artifacts
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:24 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO the emphasis on committer affiliation is misguided. overloading
+1 from me too. Had reviewed this last week but must have forgotten to post
the vote.
...ant
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Michael Baessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache UIMA project ask the Apache Incubator PMC
Dear root,
Please create an id for Feng Wang on the Tuscany project under Incubation.
Preferred userid: fwang
Full name: Feng Wang
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file.
Votes:
of the Apache Tuscany Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Tuscany Project:
* Adriano Crestani adrianocrestani at apache dot org
* ant elder antelder at apache dot org
Dear root,
Please create an id for Mario Antollini on the Tuscany project under Incubation.
Preferred userid: antollinim
Full name: Mario Antollini
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file.
,
Matthieu Riou, Davanum Srinivas, William A. Rowe, Jr., Bertrand Delacretaz
Many many thanks to everyone for all the help during the incubation.
...ant
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After 29 months in the incubator, 19 releases, 25 new committers, and
tons
Forwarding for those not on tuscany-dev...
Congratulations everyone and a very big thank you to our mentors and all the
incubator folks for their help and guidance during the incubation, wouldn't
have made it without you.
...ant
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthieu Riou
The NOTICE file in the distribution is missing the line Copyright
[] The Apache Software Foundation at the top of the file. Was
going to say thats a blocker but the doc at
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html only says should not
MUST so I guess its ok to just fix this for next time.
Looks ok to me, jar has good license/notice/disclaimer, signatures verify
etc.
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
this is just a small hotfix. Could some kind
IPMC souls please take a look? Thanks!
--Thilo
Michael Baessler
+1
...ant
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Please review and vote on approving the 1st release of Apache UIMA-AS, an
add-on to base UIMA. The release artifacts and the annotated RAT reports
can be found here:
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Jörn Kottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
the Cas Editor is a text annotation tool which supports manual and
automatic
annotation of CAS files. It is now ready for its first release.
Please review and vote for releasing the Apache Uima Cas
Looks ok to me so +1.
Would be helpful to include a RAT report with the request, but I ran it
myself and it didn't highlight any issues.
If the doc pdf is going to be distributed separately it should probably
include the Incubator disclaimer text, maybe on the page which already has
the Apache
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Assaf Arkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:18 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks ok to me so +1.
Would be helpful to include a RAT report with the request, but I ran it
myself and it didn't highlight any issues
+1,
but i've noticed another potential issue in
CasEditor-linux.gtk.x86-2.2.2-incubating.zip which i'll mention in case
others object - there are some licenses in the top level LICENSE file and
some other licenses in the about_files folder that are not mentioned in the
top LICENSE file. I guess
+1
A few comments for next time:
- Would be good to have a RELEASE_NOTES file in the distributions as there
is nothing included which says what Sanselan does or whats new in this
release
- The Apache licence header is missing from the assembly bin.xml and src.xml
in the src distribution
- Its
+1 to apply the patch.
...ant
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
broken links.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
Please vote on
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jörn Kottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but i've noticed another potential issue in
CasEditor-linux.gtk.x86-2.2.2-incubating.zip which i'll mention in case
others object - there are some licenses in the top level LICENSE file and
some other licenses in the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig 0.1.0-incubating. We had 4
+1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes. (Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
.
The artifacts are available at
Replies inline.
...ant
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now
like to
request the approval of the Incubator PMC to make the release.
+1
the entire process?
Thanks,
Olga
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *ant
elder
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:32 PM
*To:* Olga Natkovich
*Cc:* general@incubator.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0
Yes.
...ant
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:25:55AM +0100, ant elder wrote:
The rest of the release looks fine to me too, so +1.
Binding?
--
Noah Slater,
http://people.apache.org/~nslater/http://people.apache.org
Looks good to me now, +1.
One more suggestion for next time is it would be nice to add a sentence to
the top of the release notes saying what Pig does and to include the release
notes within the distribution.
...ant
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
CouchDB's current notice file looks like:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE
This matches Apache httpd's NOTICE file:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE
So
+1
...ant
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since wiki pages can change, the full text of the proposal needs to be
in the vote thread.
Here is the text of the proposal:
== Abstract ==
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Aidan Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for checking these.
There should be a KEYS file high up in your directory structure. I didn't
look too hard for it elsewhere, but just
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The current tally is extremely close (9 +1 vs. 8 -1 binding)
I don't want to close an issue with such a small margin.
I suggest that we should not change policy
+1
...ant
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation.
The proposal can be found at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal
The text of the proposal
= Droids, an intelligent standalone robot
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Jörg Reiher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
the community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating
and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like
to request the
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:23 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
+1
though i do think for the next release all those separate licenses in the
top level folder should be merged into the single LICENSE
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Steve Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A couple of weeks ago I posted the existence of a draft proposal for a new
project.
(For those of you who missed it it's here -
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KatoProposal)
I've only had one comment so far, so I'm
+1
...ant
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
The Tika community has voted [1] to request and the Lucene PMC has
accepted [2] graduating Apache Tika to a Lucene subproject. As
described in in the graduation guide [3], I now ask the Incubator PMC
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Steve Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A couple of weeks ago I posted the existence of a draft proposal for a new
project.
(For those of you who missed it it's here -
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KatoProposal)
I've only had one comment so far, so I'm
to be a mentor.
Ant Elder
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
The Kato proposal has been out for discussion for a few weeks now,
please vote on accepting the Kato project
This vote has been open for a week now so I'm going to call it PASSED with
19 +1s and no other votes.
Votes from the following, binding ones marked with a *:
Carmine Cristallo
Konstantin Bobrovsky
*Ant Elder
*Geir Magnusson Jr.
*Niclas Hedhman
Niklas Gustavsson
*Matthias Wessendorf
Christian
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose Stonehenge as an incubator proposal.
Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
Architecture that spans languages and platforms and demonstrates best
practise and
+1
...ant
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt
that the
Qpid project should increase its
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Steve Poole spoole...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
Since KATO was accepted into Incubator in November, there were some of
the
usual requests for stuff to be set up by INFRA.
On 3rd
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:54 AM, James Dixson dixs...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating.
With this release we have updated all of the licensing/headers for the
project to meet Apache standards, fixed a few
, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:06 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:54 AM, James Dixson dixs...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating.
With this release we have updated all of the licensing
+1
...ant
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:54 PM, James Dixson dixs...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are new package versions for apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating. A
DISCLAIMER.txt is now included...
From the original vote request...
Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
The following podlings should report today on their status, but have
yet to write up their report [1]:
Bluesky
Cassandra
Empire-db
Imperius
JSPWiki
Kato
Ki
Lucene.Net
Olio
RCF
Stonehenge
Tashi
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, it occurs to me that since the distribution archives don't
have the offending code, we should be able to release 1.1 as packaged
(pending the vote), and if legal-discuss says that we need to remove
that stuff
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, putting a file in a publicly accessible SVN
repository is considered as distribution too.
No, I am very positive that this is not the
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:59 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
As far
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Additional concern, it does not appear that the mentors are planning to
be on the PMC. Why not?
Why is this a concern? Mentors volunteer to do mentoring to ensure the
project is viable and understands the Apache
+1
...ant
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
I think the vote is still up...
@Incubator folks: please review the bit. Kevan and I already voted +1 ...
-M
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Now,
+1 to release. I've just had a look and this looks ok to me, even with
those few generated files getting included in the distro i think its
ok to release this as-is. One comment inline below...
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Ian Bostoni...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
This vote has been in progress
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Vinayak Borkarvbo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache VXQuery,
a Java based XQuery processor, for a vote
The full proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/VXQueryProposal
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The Cassandra developers have approved the release of 0.3.0-rc3 as
0.3.0-final.
Proposal:
Ok Torsten I can take your place as i've already been helping out there a bit.
...ant
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Torsten Curdttcu...@apache.org wrote:
No reaction at all?
Someone free to step up?
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:49, Torsten Curdttcu...@apache.org wrote:
Hey folks,
I
+1
...ant
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Eric Evanseev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.3.0 RC3 as 0.3.0-final.
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
The Cassandra Project is
All poddling committers should have write access to the
people.apache.org repository at
/x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository, so just copy
the release artifacts there. These days though Incubator poddlings can
also use the Maven central repository instead of the Incubator
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Martijn
Dashorstmartijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
2009/8/3 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
[x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
I'm not seeing sufficient
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
I would suggest that anyone wishing to vote -1 on the graduation of a
podling on grounds of diversity of code commits needs to back it up
with documented evidence that either a) the committers are not
listening to the
For the record, I'm -1, i'd like to see a bit more diversity of the
active committers to show this is operating as an Apache project
should.
...ant
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Gang,
Apache Pivot is one of the fastest moving codebases at Apache,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Snitkovsky,
Martinmartin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community has started the voting to release Wink 0.1.
The voting mail thread can be viewed at
+1
...ant
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
[X ] +1, go ahead and mothball/pause Lokahi,
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
You can put all the licenses or references to the licences in the
LICENSE file.
AIUI this is only best practice, not normative. every third party
library MUST have a license but including them next to
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all 3rd party code
included in the propose release.
no - just require 3rd party attribution notices and relocated
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Evanseev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the Thrift release
legal issues thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
I disagree. It must be possible to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com
wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com
wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The vote is now closed with the following results:
* +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
* 0 votes: 0
* -1 votes: 0
The vote passes.
I wish
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The vote is now closed with the following results
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 18, 2009, at 8:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
For the recent LICENSE and NOTICE file issues the current policy
allows for the different approaches, different TLPs use different
approaches, there's not been
: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
- Original Message
From: ant elder
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Ralph Goersralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:00:00 PM
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ted Leung twle...@sauria.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:34:50 PM
Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
On Aug 19, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Joe
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ted Leungtwle...@sauria.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2009, at 10:01 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Exactly. The incubator enforces Best Practices even when these are poorly
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Marcel
Offermansmarcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:12 , ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I agree with Bill that it's a good thing for the Incubator to clarify
best
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Niall
Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ted Leungtwle...@sauria.com
What do people think about changing the poddling release voting
process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the
poddlings dev list instead of the dual voting we have now with a
poddling dev list vote followed by an general@ vote? This would be
similar to the changes done recently
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:40 AM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri 21 Aug 2009 14:58, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people think about changing the poddling release voting
process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the
poddlings dev list instead
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:40 PM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri 21 Aug 2009 14:58, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people think about changing the poddling release voting
process so
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
AIUI, all proposed releases must be voted on by the IPMC, not just by
the podlings.
And they still would be as the only binding votes are from IPMC
members, and thats just the same as the situation with the poddling
new
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Rainer Döbeledoeb...@esteam.de wrote:
I agree with Martijn's view on the first release of a podling which is much
more critical than subsequent releases.
But for subsequent releases the voting process should be simplified in one
way or the other. At the
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org wrote:
My concern is more that of 'complacent mentors'... How many people
vote +1 even if they have not scrutinized the release requirements?
IMHO, too
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Snitkovsky,
Martinmartin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1
The voting mail thread can be viewed at: http://tiny.cc/es4Zu
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
401 - 500 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
