On 6/20/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/20/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll attend the Dublin conference, getting in Tuesday late morning.
I'm interested in contributing, especially to the sample incubator
project template in the area of
On 6/20/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd
probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday morning,
On 6/20/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll attend the Dublin conference, getting in Tuesday late morning.
I'm interested in contributing, especially to the sample incubator
project template in the area of template web site and template build
scripts based on maven. I
On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd
probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday morning,
since some folks may still be getting in.
How does Monday afternoon work?
Tuesday is pretty much full up already
On 6/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd
probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday morning,
since some folks may still be getting in.
How does Monday
Hi,
I'll attend the Dublin conference, getting in Tuesday late morning.
I'm interested in contributing, especially to the sample incubator
project template in the area of template web site and template build
scripts based on maven. I haven't seen much on these topics recently,
so I guess
On 5/6/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at
least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some progress
on this stuff with Robert and whomever else can make it. We should
also be able to have some live
On 6/7/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/6/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at
least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some
On 5/6/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
really need to try to find time to get to grips with the documentation
on
the foundation and incubator sites. been thinking about making this a
goal
of mine for infrathon/hackthon in
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 11:44 -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at
least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some progress
on this stuff with Robert and whomever else can make it. We should
also
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Count me in as a remote hackathon participant (I won't be going to Dublin).
Yep, if there is a way that i can help remotely, then i will.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Count me in as a remote hackathon participant (I won't be going to Dublin).
-jean
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
really need to try to find time to get to grips with the documentation on
the foundation and incubator sites. been thinking
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 11:44 -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at
least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some progress
on this stuff with Robert and whomever else can make it. We should
also be able to have some live
On 4/26/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:40:34AM -0600, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
*sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days.
Nowhere does any policy ever say you can do
On 4/21/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo Simons wrote:
James, dude,
*sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days.
Nowhere does any policy ever say you
On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/21/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Incidentally there are useful bits of documentation on performing
releases in the documentation/wikis of various projects at Apache.
I've hacked up a quick wiki page to
On 4/24/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
most of the questions raised are covered in the canonical documentation:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. i'd hope that all release
managers
for podlings would
Ken wrote:
[I don't see] any notice concerning [bundled jar] IP and
licensing terms. There is no NOTICE file. Some of these
jars are apparently licensed under CPL or CDDL, which most
definitely cannot be bundled without clear notice.
- -1, at least until a proper and complete NOTICE file
James Strachan wrote:
FWIW now that the ActiveMQ build is fixed it should never again fail
these incubator release requirements - though it did take quite a few
attempts to get there. This is the first attempt at a milestone
release of ServiceMix so its hardly surprising that one little thing
On 4/20/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-1
Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The
fact that other people have voted +1 without
Hey Dan,
I wrote a long-ish e-mail about all this, but I don't think its going to
help anyone. So I apologize for any and all confusion.
Concretely...
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:05:33AM -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote:
I am really confused by the reaction to this. I don't see any reason to
be
James, dude,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:15:48AM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
On 4/20/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-1
Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of
On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo Simons wrote:
James, dude,
*sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days.
Nowhere does any policy ever say you can do stuff which is not permitted by
law or for which you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillame,
I see eighty six (86) jar files in the non-source kit.
Assuming that the project.properties file describes
their origins, I see a number of them with non-AL
licences (not necessarily an issue), and I don't see
that attribution is given for
On 4/20/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The
fact that other people have voted +1 without verifying that the release
adheres to Incubator policy is a bit
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-1
Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The
fact that other people have voted +1 without verifying that the release
adheres to Incubator
I am really confused by the reaction to this. I don't see any reason to
be puzzled or upset. I don't want to make this a bigger issue than it
is, but:
1. The project is incubating and this is the first time its done an
Apache release. There are a lot of check boxes that need to be checked
The incubation disclaimer is in the README.txt file at the root of the
distributions.
The incubator is prepended to the maven groupId which leads to a
incubator-servicemix directory name where
all attributes are available. This have already been the case for
several incubating projects so I
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 4/18/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ServiceMix project voted on and has approved a proposal to release
ServiceMix 3.0-M1.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would
now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
29 matches
Mail list logo