Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-27 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/20/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/20/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'll attend the Dublin conference, getting in Tuesday late morning. I'm interested in contributing, especially to the sample incubator project template in the area of

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-20 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/20/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday morning,

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-20 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/20/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'll attend the Dublin conference, getting in Tuesday late morning. I'm interested in contributing, especially to the sample incubator project template in the area of template web site and template build scripts based on maven. I

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday morning, since some folks may still be getting in. How does Monday afternoon work? Tuesday is pretty much full up already

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-19 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 6/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday morning, since some folks may still be getting in. How does Monday

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-19 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi, I'll attend the Dublin conference, getting in Tuesday late morning. I'm interested in contributing, especially to the sample incubator project template in the area of template web site and template build scripts based on maven. I haven't seen much on these topics recently, so I guess

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-07 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 5/6/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some progress on this stuff with Robert and whomever else can make it. We should also be able to have some live

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-06-07 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 6/7/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/7/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/6/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-05-10 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 5/6/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: really need to try to find time to get to grips with the documentation on the foundation and incubator sites. been thinking about making this a goal of mine for infrathon/hackthon in

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-05-07 Thread Ross Gardler
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 11:44 -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote: So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some progress on this stuff with Robert and whomever else can make it. We should also

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-05-07 Thread David Crossley
Jean T. Anderson wrote: Count me in as a remote hackathon participant (I won't be going to Dublin). Yep, if there is a way that i can help remotely, then i will. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-05-06 Thread Jean T. Anderson
Count me in as a remote hackathon participant (I won't be going to Dublin). -jean Cliff Schmidt wrote: On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: really need to try to find time to get to grips with the documentation on the foundation and incubator sites. been thinking

Re: Dublin Docathon (was Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix)

2006-05-06 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 11:44 -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote: So, let me put it this way: I'm committed to sit at a table for at least eight hours during the two hackathon days and make some progress on this stuff with Robert and whomever else can make it. We should also be able to have some live

Release Documentation [WAS Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix]

2006-04-27 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 4/26/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:40:34AM -0600, Bruce Snyder wrote: On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leo Simons wrote: *sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days. Nowhere does any policy ever say you can do

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 4/21/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo Simons wrote: James, dude, *sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days. Nowhere does any policy ever say you

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-24 Thread James Strachan
On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/21/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Incidentally there are useful bits of documentation on performing releases in the documentation/wikis of various projects at Apache. I've hacked up a quick wiki page to

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 4/24/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] most of the questions raised are covered in the canonical documentation: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. i'd hope that all release managers for podlings would

RE: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-22 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Ken wrote: [I don't see] any notice concerning [bundled jar] IP and licensing terms. There is no NOTICE file. Some of these jars are apparently licensed under CPL or CDDL, which most definitely cannot be bundled without clear notice. - -1, at least until a proper and complete NOTICE file

RE: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-22 Thread Noel J. Bergman
James Strachan wrote: FWIW now that the ActiveMQ build is fixed it should never again fail these incubator release requirements - though it did take quite a few attempts to get there. This is the first attempt at a milestone release of ServiceMix so its hardly surprising that one little thing

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-21 Thread James Strachan
On 4/20/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: -1 Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The fact that other people have voted +1 without

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-21 Thread Leo Simons
Hey Dan, I wrote a long-ish e-mail about all this, but I don't think its going to help anyone. So I apologize for any and all confusion. Concretely... On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:05:33AM -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote: I am really confused by the reaction to this. I don't see any reason to be

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-21 Thread Leo Simons
James, dude, On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:15:48AM +0100, James Strachan wrote: On 4/20/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: -1 Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-21 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo Simons wrote: James, dude, *sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days. Nowhere does any policy ever say you can do stuff which is not permitted by law or for which you

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-20 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guillame, I see eighty six (86) jar files in the non-source kit. Assuming that the project.properties file describes their origins, I see a number of them with non-AL licences (not necessarily an issue), and I don't see that attribution is given for

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-20 Thread James Strachan
On 4/20/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -1 Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The fact that other people have voted +1 without verifying that the release adheres to Incubator policy is a bit

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-20 Thread Leo Simons
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: -1 Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The fact that other people have voted +1 without verifying that the release adheres to Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-20 Thread Dan Diephouse
I am really confused by the reaction to this. I don't see any reason to be puzzled or upset. I don't want to make this a bigger issue than it is, but: 1. The project is incubating and this is the first time its done an Apache release. There are a lot of check boxes that need to be checked

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet
The incubation disclaimer is in the README.txt file at the root of the distributions. The incubator is prepended to the maven groupId which leads to a incubator-servicemix directory name where all attributes are available. This have already been the case for several incubating projects so I

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

2006-04-18 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. -- dims On 4/18/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ServiceMix project voted on and has approved a proposal to release ServiceMix 3.0-M1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC