On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:08 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) Relax the exit criteria: Especially the diversity requirement is a
major barrier for many projects. There have been various calls to
relax the diversity
2009/11/10 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
3) Increase the amount of mentoring: The lack of mentor time and
better (not necessarily more) supporting documentation gives
unnecessary administrational and procedural headaches (failed release
votes, etc.) to many podlings.
Without more
I like the proposal of 3 steps prior to releasing... In Greg's words:
it teaches instead of hinders. It divides the arduous process of
cutting a release in more manageable steps and would make passing the
actual release easier/faster.
Martijn
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Robert Burrell
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
My point above was the Board, at least in the past(*), has *not* been
happy about the average duration.
The way I see it, there are three main
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
I personally think that the exit criteria are good as they are (in
hindsight, Abdera is a good example of a project that graduated
