Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, back in Jakarta's heyday, the general list was the meeting place
for all the subprojects. It was a lot of fun.
I'm not sure we could do that on an apache-wide scale though. Part of
the fun was because we knew
On 3/10/06, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/9/06, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that mailing-lists are part of the foundation of the ASF and
are a really useful way to communicate effectively. However my feeling
is that we don't have the right tools or policies
On 3/10/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we should subscribe all apache mail lists to one google account
and figure out how to have a web site proxy searches into it...
You'd think Google would be enthusiastic to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Well, back in Jakarta's heyday, the general list was the meeting place
for all the subprojects. It was a lot of fun.
I'm not sure we could do that on an apache-wide scale though. Part of
the fun was because we knew
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Well, back in Jakarta's heyday, the general list was the meeting place
for all the subprojects. It was a lot of fun.
I'm not sure we could do that on an apache-wide scale though. Part of
On 3/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, back in Jakarta's heyday, the general list was the meeting place
for all the subprojects. It was a lot of fun.
I'm not sure we could do that on an apache-wide scale though. Part of
the fun was because we knew each other, and that
One of thing things that the we need to look at is how to improve
communication across projects. Perhaps having some ontological mailing
lists would be part of a solution.
What ideas and views do others have?
I know that mailing-lists are part of the foundation of the ASF and
are a really
On 3/9/06, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of thing things that the we need to look at is how to improve
communication across projects. Perhaps having some ontological mailing
lists would be part of a solution.
What ideas and views do others have?
I know that mailing-lists
Echoing robert...
inline
Matthieu Riou wrote:
One of thing things that the we need to look at is how to improve
communication across projects. Perhaps having some ontological mailing
lists would be part of a solution.
What ideas and views do others have?
I know that mailing-lists are part
On 3/9/06, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that mailing-lists are part of the foundation of the ASF and
are a really useful way to communicate effectively. However my feeling
is that we don't have the right tools or policies to use them as
effectively as could be. For example,
On 3/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we should subscribe all apache mail lists to one google account
and figure out how to have a web site proxy searches into it...
You'd think Google would be enthusiastic to support this -- right now,
there's a zillion of us all
On 3/9/06, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that if we acknowledge that a community as a group of peers, working
towards a common goal, then that would derive umbrellas from projects where
there are distinctions of authority (and therefor work) within that
community's codebase.
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the only caveat being DB is feeling a little bit umbrella-ish these
days.
I've seen this comment a couple of times in the last week or so, but I
don't really understand what it's trying to say.
What makes an Apache project
. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:34 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Thoughts on Umbrellas, Federations, and Communication
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the only caveat being DB is feeling a little bit umbrella-ish
On 3/8/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASF projects are supposed to be about a community managing a project. So
the warning signs include large disjoint communities, e.g., Jakarta, the old
XML project (which, itself, was a Jakarta spin-off), etc.
So, good project boundaries are
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
ASF projects are supposed to be about a community managing a project. So
the warning signs include large disjoint communities, e.g., Jakarta, the old
XML project (which, itself, was a Jakarta spin-off), etc.
So, good project boundaries are considered to be
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/8/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASF projects are supposed to be about a community managing a project. So
the warning signs include large disjoint communities, e.g., Jakarta, the old
XML project (which, itself, was a Jakarta spin-off), etc.
So,
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 23:33, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
What makes an Apache project umbrella-ish?
ASF projects are supposed to be about a community managing a project. So
the warning signs include large disjoint communities, e.g., Jakarta, the
old XML project
18 matches
Mail list logo
