* Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Order...but that's about the extent of it ;-). Putting the page up
| would of course excite RMS people into a frenzy, but who cares (I have
| mail filters). If people want the info, let em have it.
It doesn't need to be a bashing of the GPL. It
Send in a patch or write one it seems like you've researched the issue
beyond *it sucks*.
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 06:16, Jeff Turner wrote:
Hi,
Is there a page somewhere at apache.org, explaining why anyone would want to
switch from GPL to ASL? The GNU.org site paints a very inspiring picture
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must realize that there are different objectives. It is the goal of
GNU to get all software to use the GPL. It is not a goal of Apache to
get all software covered by the APL. We're programmers, not lawyers.
That's why I wouldn't be that
: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: ASL vs. GPL page?
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must realize that there are different objectives. It is the goal of
GNU to get all software to use
Pier wrote:
That's why I wouldn't be that comfortable with a Why GPL sucks page...
Political propaganda? Looks really like it... And IMO that's not
what we're
here to do... We're here to write software...
+1 IMO The licence is there to empower us, its not a product, its a
by-product of the
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 07:39, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must realize that there are different objectives. It is the goal of
GNU to get all software to use the GPL. It is not a goal of Apache to
get all software covered by the APL. We're
Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And anyway aren't licence issues beyond the remit of Jakarta?
Practically anyone has a word on the matter, as members are listening, but
the legal decision (and legal obligations, bindings, restrictions,
yadayadayada) are a privilege of members of the
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 07:39, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must realize that there are different objectives. It is the goal of
GNU to get all software to use the GPL. It is not a goal of Apache to
get all
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And anyway aren't licence issues beyond the remit of Jakarta?
Practically anyone has a word on the matter, as members are listening, but
the legal decision (and legal obligations, bindings, restrictions,
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002 14:09:23 Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote.
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of what we think and why is on the web already... It's in the mail
archives, in the presentations to different conferences, and so on... The
word is out there, you just need
Jeff == Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff Here's a starting resource:
Jeff http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a//policy/2001/12/12/transition.html
this link produced a (ouch) 500 response from oreilly. I was able to
find another link that worked:
11 matches
Mail list logo
