Sam, Noel, everyone..
With respect to dnsjava and mm.mysql, my understanding is that
we had indeed
received such alternate licensing. Perhaps this needs to be
made more clear
somewhere.
If they issued a separate license for everyone to use, then I see no
record of this on
Danny Angus wrote:
With respect to dnsjava and mm.mysql, my understanding is that we
had indeed received such alternate licensing. Perhaps this needs
to be made more clear somewhere.
If they issued a separate license for everyone to use, then I see
no record of this on their website. If
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 13:46, Sam Ruby wrote:
MySQL have indicated to me that they do intend to provide (or
consider providing) specific less restrictive licences to certain
groups, and that jakarta would likely be one, but I haven't heard any
more, and until then the last release of
I would, of course, pass this on as even a specific
licence for Apache may not accord with either the ASFL or
distribution of the driver by our mirrors. FWIW I believe that I
summarised this on general@jakarta at the time, but perhaps not.
The net affect of such a license
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam,
We've been discussing the jar licensing, and want to check: do we have an
action item TODAY, or do we wait for the board meeting to provide formal
guidance?
If I am correct in presuming that you are looking over James's assets,
then you have no action item from me
: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 9:11
To: Noel J. Bergman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Action items now or after board meeting?
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam,
We've been discussing the jar licensing, and want to check
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We do have the ASL license in our CVS. What we don't have is a copy of it
in the particular directories that contain the builds of Avalon jars that
we're using. What is the specific requirement? And is it really true that
if the license is embedded in the jar file, that
If you believe that people would reasonably expect to find
the license in the jar file, then I would say this complies.
No, I don't. As I said, there is a copy of the license in the James CVS
root. The question was whether there needed to be copies co-located
elsewhere in the structure where
