Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit the
essential design and planning effort put in by users commiters and
non-commiters that shapes the product and maps its progress.
d.
This makes me think of all the projects on SourceForge that shoot up
high into the
On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:17, Danny Angus wrote:
Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit the
essential design and planning effort put in by users commiters and
non-commiters that shapes the product and maps its progress.
Agreed - even worse. Sometimes after these
: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 13 May 2002 12:31
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Project Activity
On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:17, Danny Angus wrote:
Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit the
essential design and planning effort put in by users
Agreed!
Danny Angus wrote:
Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit the
essential design and planning effort put in by users commiters and
non-commiters that shapes the product and maps its progress.
d.
This makes me think of all the projects on SourceForge
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Peter Donald wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:17, Danny Angus wrote:
Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit the
essential design and planning effort put in by users commiters and
non-commiters that shapes the product and maps its progress.
: Project Activity
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:17, Danny Angus wrote:
Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit
the
essential design and planning effort put in by users commiters and
non-commiters that shapes the product and maps its
General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Project Activity
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Peter Donald wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:17, Danny Angus wrote:
Sometimes lists are where the activity is, commits alone don't credit
the
essential design and planning effort put
I think this might be what you mean by file activity, but might not.
Aren't there two types of project activity. Developer activity and user
activity. Having no developer activity is not a bad sign if there is high
user activity, ie) sign of a solid/stable piece of code.
Now I don't know of any
I think that's pretty cool functionality. I don't agree with your way
of judging project activity.. Thats like trying to put a metric on how
blue the sky is today. I'm sure you could but what of the day where
your metric says its grey but I'm looking up and seeing blue (perhaps
because a grey
This makes me think of all the projects on SourceForge that shoot up
high into the project ratings, with a high activity percentile, just
because they turn the news function into a message board.
If I were to move code from src/java to src/foo, that's quite a few
commits.
You written your 1000
10 matches
Mail list logo
