| I note for the record, however, that I received two copies of this email,
| which means that Joe must have hit Group Reply, so that means that *even
| with* Reply-to munging on, the principle of minimal bandwidth is violated :-)
Not that I think it matters _that_ much, but I seriously like
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
| on 7/11/01 11:12 AM, Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| I note for the record, however, that I received two copies of this email,
| which means that Joe must have hit Group Reply, so that means that *even
| with* Reply-to munging on, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I expect the list to behave the way it does ..
-Original Message-
From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reply-to munging
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:36
Joseph Dane wrote:
Alex == Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding
Alex Reply-to on all the jakarta lists?
Alex Please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Alex before asking why it's a problem.
on 7/10/01 9:36 AM, Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding Reply-to on
all the jakarta lists?
Please read
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
before asking why it's a problem.
-1
That document is one persons
Alex == Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding
Alex Reply-to on all the jakarta lists?
Alex Please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Alex before asking why it's a problem.
* Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding
| Reply-to on all the jakarta lists?
I agree with this, but this case has been up before with some people
having very strong feelings about the current config. I would prefer
to keep the
No need.
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
-warner
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Reply-to munging
on 7/10/01 9:36 AM, Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can
At 21:11 10.07.2001 +0200, Gunnar Rønning wrote:
* Alex Chaffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding
| Reply-to on all the jakarta lists?
I agree with this, but this case has been up before with some people
having very strong feelings about
on 7/10/01 2:09 PM, Joseph Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
my vote, FWIW, is to leave things as they are.
--
joe
HELL YES!
That essay conveys *exactly* what I was thinking. I love it. Thanks for the
link. I'm saving that one
HELL YES!
That essay conveys *exactly* what I was thinking. I love it. Thanks for the
link. I'm saving that one forever.
Me too. It did a great job of capturing the vacuous nature of each
argument in the original essay. I took the liberty of adding a neutral
statement with links to both
11 matches
Mail list logo
