Having named leads of any sort is the antithesis of what I would like
to
see within the ASF.
Fair enough, but there's no reason I can see why a JCP lead shouldn't be
an OSS chair, I guess the JCP needs spec leads like the ASF needs
chairpeople, to be a single point of refrence from above
On Mar 22, 2004, at 6:02 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
Having named leads of any sort is the antithesis of what I would
like
to
see within the ASF.
Fair enough, but there's no reason I can see why a JCP lead
shouldn't be
an OSS chair, I guess the JCP needs spec leads like the ASF needs
On 19 Mar 2004, at 08:50, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Mar 2004, at 12:47, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:32:31 +0100
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
snip
Depends
Sister resources doesn't sit well with me. It feels like a very odd phrase
of English. The only other one I know of is 'Sister Cities', which implies
a sense of equality between the cities.
Resources (Unofficial) gets my vote, as that lets us link in bits in our
own Wiki or personal apache
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:28:14 -0500 (EST)
Henri Yandell wrote:
Sister resources doesn't sit well with me. It feels like a very odd phrase
of English. The only other one I know of is 'Sister Cities', which implies
a sense of equality between the cities.
Okay, this is what I wanted to hear. :)
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resources (Unofficial) gets my vote,
works for me.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
