On Fri, 3 May 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm also very unhappy with the xml/jakarta separation and
the balkanisation of apache - as well shown by the current
maven/forest/cocoon/centipede discussion, where even xml.apache.org
is affected by jakarta's NIH.
So I'll be -1 ( as a
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
My point is that, like it or not (I like it, Costin doesn't) there is some
benefit of letting like minded people form a community unto themselves -
this is the whole argument behind bringing XML and Jakarta together - lots
of like minded
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/2/02 5:28 PM, Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) We'd probably be running UNIX on our desktops with a standard
and friendly GUI.
I am. I use a mac w/ OS X :)
Same here...
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I am. I use a mac w/ OS X :)
Same here... Everywhere... :)
Me too. I'm hooked. TiBook wherever I go, dualie 800 at home. Can't go
back.
The Apple Java list has had some complaints recently that Sun don't care
about Apple users and
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 5/3/02 10:04 AM, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apple Java list has had some complaints recently that Sun don't care
about Apple users and that Apple can't supply the time to support Java
users.
Well duh. Apple's business
Martin Poeschl wrote:
snip
there are only 2 apache developers on the ojb developer list (Jason van Zyl and me)
i think it would be good to give the other ojb developers some time to see how
everything works here .
I think I need to speak more often then :) Admittedly, I'm only a
I think this might be what you mean by file activity, but might not.
Aren't there two types of project activity. Developer activity and user
activity. Having no developer activity is not a bad sign if there is high
user activity, ie) sign of a solid/stable piece of code.
Now I don't know of any
I took it as tongue in cheek :) I mean...who wouldn't be interested solely
in Jakarta. It beggar's belief.
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
You do realize you just said that on general@jakarta ;-)
Alex McLintock wrote:
But I'm not just interested in the Jakarta projects -
Having decided to licence some code under the Apache licence, and some
documentation as well, I headed to the Jakarta front page to find a link
to the licence. No dice. Then I tried the main Apache front page, no luck
again.
Shouldn't these link to the licence? Or the two or three licences in
+1.
Another example if I could. The job role of 'Java admin' is growing more
and more at companies. Developers shouldn't be adminning things, but would
you have your unix or oracle admin be the admin of the Java side with zero
Java knowledge?
Jakarta houses the 'Java' community at Apache but
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 6/27/02 11:10 AM, Kasper Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't maven more directed towards each independent top-project??
The great thing about the java.sun.com layout is that there is so much room
for writing stuff and linking to
The Url no works.
Nice job though [from the email]. Wonder when there'll be a drive for a
separate mail list just for the newsletter, or to send it to the announce
list.
Hen
Jakarta Newsletter
==
Issue: 1
Date: June 2002
URL:
The Jon page completely ignores the concept of a Jakarta project to build
a set of protocols under which Jon can act so as to avoid causing riots in
first world countries. I would like to propose this as a top level Jakarta
project and fully believe its mail list will receive more noise than any
Confused though. There are 22 Jakarta projects listed on osdir [or at
least via onjava.com there are]. What's special about the bits below?
And where are they meant to be placed? On download pages?
Hen
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Doh... My doing, as always! :-) Cool stuff,
It's been down all day for me.
ssh/web/mail-lists until now.
Been hearing the same from people in the UK, so seems not to be localised
to kentucky.
Hen
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Moore wrote:
It's painfully slow and I'm getting 403 errors to areas I know are public.
--
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 3/10/02 15:35, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2/are we
a) young
b) 20-30
c) 30-40
d) 40-50
d) old
My mother would _kill_ your for saying that over-50 is old
Pier
The fact that Pier's mother listens to the mail list
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Rob Oxspring wrote:
Now that I'm back on my feet again I'm wondering what to do about the missing
issue... Otis sent a lucene update, but is it worth
pursuing others for contributions or should we skip September and have a bumper
October issue? alternatively we could
If we're expected to nominate ourselves as such, it'd be nice to have some
guidelines as to what we should be looking at in our day-to-day Apache
goings on to know that the time has come. So we don't look like young
punks :)
Hen
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Hi all,
[from a
We've used Tapestry at work. My colleague is very impressed with it and
has had good vibes from contributing back to Howard. [I'm more
conservative and despite liking the ideas in general, wanted us to back
off to a simpler system until we could have time to understand Tapestry
better. Sorry
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ellis Teer wrote:
Note: I don't like too much the stats from webalizer and I have started
using awstats
I've been a webalizer user too. It suffices.
(http://jakarta.apache.org/~vmassol/awstats/awstats.jakarta.apache.org.h
tml) as an experiment. Much better stats I
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Vincent Massol wrote:
Ok I want to be positive and try to see if there's anything I can do to
improve the overall Cactus community. You say Cactus might be missing
some marketing muscles. I would like to believe that. From the
information in my email do you still
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Michael A. Smith wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Why not just decide to move the Jakarta Commons projects to Commons and
the Sandbox ones to Incubator?
This is not a proposal for a diktat, but a *suggestion* for Jakarta
Commons projects to
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Therefor I still think Jakarta Commons should fix their naming scheme.
But that will have to be brought up there, not here.
It's completely impractical, and will hurt Jakarta immensely.
Oh, well, now that I think
Linux Magazine's backpage article is a little thing on Java and Linux
together etc. [Steve J. Vaughan-Nichols]. Apache Software Foundation's
Jakarta project gets a good mention, however he seems to ascribe JBoss as
being a Jakarta project :) Which is a shame that maybe Jakarta's brand is
being a
I don't suppose anyone knows if Sun generate out their tutorials from some
other format? It looks generated but lacks nice things like 'this page
generated by Sun Frontpage' or something :)
It seems a good format to use for tutorials for other Java resources.
Hen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Usually because I'm assembling a list of docs for a PDA, or for a company
document server, or whatever :)
But Andrew's right. The docs are generally in the binary downloads.
Website needs improving to make that more clear...
Hen
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
For POI
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Thanks to the valid help of Brian Ewins
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I have committed the revised new
versions of the logos, which should be fine now.
If there are problems (incase, probably more due to my conversions than
to his work), please report
/
Putting a site up is on my todo for IO.
Thanks,
Hen
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Arnon Moscona wrote:
Doesn't look fixed from where I sit...
Thanks,
Arnon
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:01 PM
To: Jakarta General List
I originally mentioned this on the Commons list, but as xdocs are used
pretty heavily across Jakarta, I thought I'd try here too.
I have a bug with the site generation. Either that or user-stupidity.
I want a url in the xdoc file which has 's in.
If I just do it the html way, xdocs aren't
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:17:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xdocs
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Socha, Henri J,,DMDCWEST wrote:
Make the list of Jakarta subprojects more prominent. It does not have to be
on a seperate page, on the main page is fine and probably best. My request
is placing it and/or links to it in such a position that finding it is
easier.
I
was a motivator.
Do we need to change this now Apache Incubator has been voted for?
Also, as far as I know, only Apache may use the Apache License. Should
this link to some form of page on how to use the Apache License?
Hen
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/12/17 10:22 AM, Brian Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is old news I but I just saw it today: there's a tool that can
convert word 2000 docs (saved as html) to an xml doc and an xsl-t script
to generate xsl:fo - and from there to
A nice idea, and a simple way of adding in the votes, but with the issue
that people without access to jakarta-site2 are unable to commit changes.
If people want to send in patches, or just vote inline, then I'm sure
people with access can add them. [I'm happy to do so for any I see].
Hen
On
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/12/17 1:15 PM, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A nice idea, and a simple way of adding in the votes, but with the issue
that people without access to jakarta-site2 are unable to commit changes.
I'm sorry, but I'm so tired
How does this balance with Sam's:
Overall, the imperialistic expansion phase of Jakarta has been put on
pause. No new code bases have been accepted.
?
Hen
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Sure. Make sure you meet the criteria and write a proposal. You just
need some
[Someone else just emailed this, but sending to show my agreement]
There's that GMane thing that lets you view the mailing lists as a forum?
Personally I've not found any forums as easy to use as a mailing list.
Communication in a community is in three ways:
1) Multi-cast
2) Direct
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
project. I do kinda think a project proposal might be premature since
the specification isn't public yet.
I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely
premature. No code, a restricted community, too
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Luta, Raphael (VUN) wrote:
From: Henri Yandell bayard at generationjava.com
Is this different from Tomcat and/or JSTL? If so, how?
I'm clueless on portlets, but from my 'vague consumer' view, I thought
the JSR was standardising a lot of what Jetspeed does
So the suggestion is:
All Users lists become forums.
Developer lists stay.
Only problem I see there is that Developers won't check the forums as much
as they should, unless the Users forum has a mail list interface.
Hen
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Robert Simmons wrote:
Well, once again I would
Looks terrible. The img size is wrong.
Was this sarcasm? :) It's too early in the morning to notice.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
The logo on this page looksWonderful!
http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog/index.html
(mozilla 1.2.1 and IE 6.x)
-Andy
--
To
This seems to come up every now and then, so I'm just mentioning what I
remember from the previous times it has come up.
The word from on high is that LGPL is not to be distributed from Apache.
[ie no jars etc]. No legal action has officially been taken due to the
lack of funds to throw away on
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Henri Gomez wrote:
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/thundergraph/)
I contacted the main developper and he seems to be ok
with making OpenTG a jakarta project.
So what do you think about it as a sub-project, or as a
jakarta-commons subprojec ?
I have reservations:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2003/1/10 5:06 AM, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought this might be interesting to some folks... They're porting
PHP to Java...
Yea, it is called JSP w/ scriptlets.
JSP2.0 w/ JSTL. Full of ${blah} variables to make the
Interesting points.
Who runs the JCP? Is Apache just a member, or an actual runner? If so, is
it Apache's role to comment in anyway on the current disatisfaction with
the hidden-ness of the JCP? Or is that the JCP themselves [if such exists]
role?
[Apache's role, along with all the other
vote counts. JCP is what Java has that .NET never will and
that is why .NET will win.
-- Robert
- Original Message -
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:12 AM
Subject: Re: nice
Interesting points
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Robert Simmons wrote:
But who speaks for JCP?
Those who chose to be involved.
I'm not sure I'm conveying the question properly. As an Apache committer,
I am unable to speak on behalf of the ASF. Equally, as a JCP member I
would not be able to speak on behalf of JCP.
[Electricity outages tonight mean my DNS is down. But looking at the JCP
in a text browser the mail archives are at:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jcp-interest.html
Time for more spam :)
Hen
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Robert Simmons wrote
, Henri Yandell wrote:
[Electricity outages tonight mean my DNS is down. But looking at the JCP
in a text browser the mail archives are at:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jcp-interest.html
Time for more spam :)
Hen
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Paul Hammant wrote:
[..] to choose between log4j, LogKit,
commons-logging or even JDK1.4-Logging?
There is also logging delivered by Avalon-Framework.
I thought that was LogKit Paul?
My personal view is that the makers of reusable components should
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We have 'infiltrated' it. The ASF is a member of the J2SE/J2EE
executive committee (I am the current representative), and we have many
members (and non-members) participating in various JSRs.
Yeah I know. Thus my questions as to whether
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2003/1/29 5:56 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe log4j is here to stay. Its user base is large and
growing. As time passes, more people will gravitate to it as it keeps
improving. We have enough cool features in pipe to
So the solution for committers who would like to be involved in the JCP is
to hand around their announce list and website, when a particular new JSR
is announced they can go volunteer. If successful, then they would do the
agreement thing and be an ASF representative?
Hen
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003,
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 10:30 AM, Santiago Gala wrote:
Agreed, good supporting feedback, and this is something that is a
current topic of interest in the JCP EC. We (the members of the EC,
the ASF being a member) are interested in
Mr RMS then needs to publish something about using LGPL/GPL with Java.
Personally I agree with the need for LGPL for library applications,
however LGPL's wording is phrased in C terminology and I have never seen
anyone offering good legal advice on whether LGPL is usable with Java
properly.
So
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/01/2003 02:28:59 PM:
How about we give these items some names:
Sounds good.
1) Where do I download?
Downloads
2) Has their been a release?
Release Notes
Possibly this should be 'Status
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
Sorry! Just picking one point, but :)!
Slice it all apart, one point at a time :)
7) What Apache community does Project X belong to?
What's an Apache community? Do you mean 'top-level project'?
Nope. Like, Jakarta should point to the
such a time as it goes into one of the above]
***
@author: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@creation: 2003/01/31
@state: proposal
@version: 0.1
Introduction
Purpose
---
To create a low buy-in contract for ASF projects
Scott Sanders
David Sean Taylor
Glen Stampoultzis
Mladen Turk
James Turner
Henri Yandell
Footnotes:
[1]
http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=general@
jakarta.apache.orgmsgNo=14080
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2003/2/4 4:17 PM, Eric Merhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Can you please send me or point me to information on how submitted open
source code is reviewed and tested by the organization before it is made
available for download. My
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
This issue has come up before. This time, let's flatten it.
In two weeks, there is a board meeting. At that time, I would like to
be able to report that the contents of the Maven repository conforms to
the policies of the Apache Software Foundation.
Page 7 [on printer friendly verson]'s Figure 5 lists the number of members
each 'company' has in expert groups and lists Apache as having 15.
Now, as http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=127 appears to me to have
anything from 1 to 4 Apache people on it, I imagine that the article's
numbers are
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Nick Chalko wrote:
JJAR has stalled. but maybe restarting that is a good solution.
I think building outside of maven is a worthwhile because not every one uses
maven.
I would like to see the tools and standards developed be independent of the
build tool.
This doesn't
On 5 Feb 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:29, Nick Chalko wrote:
I hope to have a proposal started on the Wiki tonight (PST). The Maven
repository
has been an essential tool for me for me.
The next step is to play nice with gump.
Then do help
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 05/02/2003 20.35:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 02:29 PM, Nick Chalko wrote:
JJAR in commons sandbox had some of these ideas in there... But can you
build this into maven rather than in parallel?
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Nick Chalko wrote:
I don't use maven to do my builds. I use a different tool(centipede or
ant).
I am proposing an Project to handle dependencies, versioning, and downloads.
The new project being separate from both Maven and Centipede but useable by
both (or other
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Nick Chalko wrote:
*nod*. +1 on using what Maven currently has, merged with anything Ruper
has learnt about being outside of Maven and tested by both the Maven
and
Centipede communities. -1 to
On 5 Feb 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 15:38, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?RuperProposal
I've set up a proposal about a Jakarta project for a Repository Project
on the wiki. Below is the current content.
Maven developers
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
The goal is to make all active committers PMC members.
Would it be quicker just to make all active committers PMC members by
default?
If the idea is that every release-manager
Nominating like this seems counter-productive. At least in the spirit it
usually occurs. ie) lots of +1's thrown about on the list etc. It'll be a
nightmare.
Why not just go into a nomination phase in which someone [I'm happy to do
this if need be] collates a list of nominations, and then the
I can understand them thinking that. I had my gut feeling on it slightly
off for a while, mainly as I was viewing one type of software.
ie) Say I grab an LGPL/GPL Java library and incorporate it into my
product, which btw I install onto client's machines via jnlp.
As I am distributing a
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Simon Brooke wrote:
On Friday 21 Feb 2003 9:18 am, Henri Gomez wrote:
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Why not merge both projects ?
I'd be happy to do that. I have working code, and a good, high-level API -
much higher level than the commons fileupload package. Also,
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Jeffrey Dever wrote:
Vote results? It unclear even when a vote is taking place and who the
nominees are. I thought we just finished a round on the 19th with an
agreement that these should be done in batches. Now Pier is up as a
nominee again and after one vote from
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
Federico wrote:
Maybe you don't understand me. We have already finished the proxy's heart
I cannot compute finished + software together.
s/finished/of release\/alpha\/beta quality/
Hen
Anyway of turning off the:
Avoid unused local variables such as 'obj'
for classes which extend TestCase?
It's not something to avoid in a TestCase, as it tests the type of the
returned value. These warnings make it hard to see the real problems.
Even if it's only a grep for TestCase.java and
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Tom Copeland wrote:
Hi Henri -
Hm, I'm sorry, I don't understand the TestCase thing... are you doing
something like:
import junit.framework.*;
public class FooTest extends TestCase {
public void testFiddle() {
Object obj = doSomething();
}
}
or something
Afaik, Daedalus/icarus are not likely to have Java containers on them
[partly because they're BSD and therefore lack a stable Java and partly
because they're just busy]. Maybe Nagoya could be doing this?
I know it'd be nice if Jakarta-taglib wars could be deployed somewhere so
people can see
I'm guessing it is:
EclipseProfiler
http://sourceforge.net/projects/eclipsecolorer/
Built in profiler
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Stéphane Mor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:49:40AM -0500, otisg wrote:
I don't know of any commercial profilers
that open source developers can use,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, now for my question : The dependancies for many projets are
pretty much the same, projets come with the jars they depend on
(and some do not) which makes for a lot of duplication. Is there a quick
way around this, a quick way to avoid
at compile-time maybe :)
But you still end up with jar duplication, you just get to avoid having to
think about it too much when compiling.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Paulo Silveira wrote:
You are looking for MAVEN, thats it
Jar duplication is history
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Sam said that we should obtain nominations for chair
from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by
the 16th, followed by [a]n election where every
member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on
the 18th.
Does http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html represent the PMC as it
currently is, or does it need updating?
What's the status of:
Future steps will include introduction of a concept of an emeritus PMC
member, reinstating prior PMC members who are still active. ?
[Sam Ruby, Jan 16th, PMC
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Does http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html represent the PMC as it
currently is, or does it need updating?
From the ASF's perspective, the official list is in the 'committers'
cvs repository in a file named board
Ok ok. Done.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I've updated the site from the file. Btw, Thomas Mahler's name is not in
alphabetical order in the file.
You updated the site but you didn't update the file? Are you waiting
for permission or something
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
+1 if I could just think of a BUSINESS PROPOSAL that could put this to
use
Let me help you get started:
Hello honored sir, my name is Mkwila Mnembi, and I am the
Is this reply FAQ/Wiki'd somewhere?
Seems to me to be a good set of questions to ask of an LGPL project to
cause happiness all around. Assuming it's okay with the powers that be,
boards/committees/usuals.
Hen
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that his LGPL explicitly permits linking
and that section 6 of the LGPL does not apply to end users, etc etc? Is
he the copyright holder?
If so than you should be good to go (from my
+1
Howard for King
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
+1
On 7/3/03 4:59 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but
I don't know if it
every made it to a vote. I'd really like to pursue
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Alex McLintock wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
At 16:28 17/07/03, Erik Price wrote:
Spoken out loud, I use Apache Web Server and in writing I use Apache
HTTPD. Once the context is clear (that I am referring to the software
and not the organization), I typically
That's all very well and good. But why do I have to read the rules to go
look at the archives?
That frustrates me every time I want to search the archives.
Hen
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Danny Angus wrote:
I believe the idea is to make people read the rules first, I wouldn't advise
changing it
Just thought I'd point out that the Apache Newsletter is sharing namespace
with http://www.apacheweek.com/. I've no idea what that's relationship is
to ASF. I've been getting it for years and only just realised that it's
not from apache.org.
So you might have some confused readers.
Hen
On Fri,
Some views:
You have a large blob of code with a small number of developers. Some
suggest this means you need to get a sourceforge project and get a
community going there, but I think that's poor if that's the only way.
My recommendation is that you find 3 Apache committers to sponsor your
What's the plan for this? [The redirect we have on the index.html at
the moment].
When are we going to remove it. How do we ensure that people don't blow it
away when they push up news for a release?
I did:
cp index.html redirect.html
cp index2.html index.html
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL
your forum carefully.
on
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
Hen
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
Will fix.
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Rick Moen wrote:
I realise it's difficult to discern legitimate mail from spam, etc.
arriving at webmaster aliases, but this request has been
Depends what you mean by compatible.
[IANAL..]
BSD licence is a effectively a template licence. ASL is effectively the
Apache-instance of a BSD licence. Anything under an ASL licence is owned
by Apache.
BSD licences are compatible with GPL licences in that if a GPL licence
uses a BSD compnent,
[for amusement value. mine mainly. i don't speak for apache in any way]
I too call on Greg to move to Resin. Not that it'll run Python there
either, but it'll not run Python faster on port 80.
I call on Vik to increase his monthly flames to be once a week, the
userbase is demanding more of your
[in case it's not obvious, this email pertains only to Jakarta committers]
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html is the informal way for
Jakarta to let the users know who we are.
When you become a Jakarta committer, it is hoped that you will add your
name and even a description if you so
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, mohammad nabil wrote:
Vic,
Notwithstanding your arguments this is not the appropriate forum for this.
This list is for project management discussion regarding the Jakarta
project.
Geronimo is not under the jursidiction of the Jakarta project.
If you want to make
Daft question, possibly, but could someone summarise the IP issue that was
happening over HiveMind and how it is currently resolved.
I've not been following the thread, but I've seen the noise. Is everything
squared away and happy?
Hen
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Nayak, Prashant wrote:
Proposal
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
I think that this is the right list, very few people are intrested about
the incubator. This is about ASF reputation. (It is also about the OSS
reputation, including BSD, Linux, CodeHus, etc.)
Why not mail the httpd list then? Or the Ant list?
1 - 100 of 677 matches
Mail list logo
