Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-*
groups are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of
jakarta-hivemind, jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and jakarta-jmeter
under the assumption that they are moving to having their own PMCs.
Tapestry is already
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Cool :) Let's do this at dinner, since there are only 2 of us ;)
:)
Would it be possible to have it on Monday or Tuesday or is there another
firm date for BOFs ?
Regards,
---rony
-
To
+1
Nathan Bubna wrote:
The Velocity project has for some time now been making plans for a
proposal to the board that the Velocity projects leave the Jakarta
umbrella and become their own top level project. Martin has asked us
to hold a vote on the proposal here before he passes it along to
+1
Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to have Petar Tahchiev as a Jakarta Committer.
Petar currently works as software engineer in Bulgaria, but was a MSc
student last year, when we proposed porting the Cactus build to Maven
2 as a GSOC (Google Summer of Code) project.
Hi S///,
It mentions setting the Reply-To to private AT jakarta when sending
the invite - is the private list also the correct place to submit the
initial proposal?
AFAIK, yes!
Just in case the proposal fails, I don't want to cause hurt to the
person by raising the vote on a public mailing
+1
Scott Eade wrote:
The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that
the Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own
top level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls
for a vote to take place.
The proposal is available at:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move
to TLP.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added
J Aaron Farr wrote:
... cut ...
As for dormant code, leave it where it is. If we still have a few
committers working on it and making releases occasionally, then we'd
still need a functional PMC. Otherwise, if we get enough noise about
a subproject, it can be revived (perhaps with help from
... snip ...
BSF
MvdB :Silent quarter. A talk for Apachecon US was accepted (Rony Flatcher),
which will hopefully increase the user base (observation : since the user
list is also pretty quiet it can mean that BSF is bug free or it needs
more users)
... snip ...
Sorry, oversaw
sebb wrote:
Thanks to those who voted so far.
At least two more PMC votes are needed - please!
S///
On 25/09/2007, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created what I hope will be JMeter 2.3 final in the directory:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/dist
Site/Docs are here:
sebb wrote:
On 19/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
[Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only]
This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into
one development and one notifications list. For background including
timing,
On 6/19/2010 5:53 PM, sebb wrote:
[Third time lucky?]
Not luck, expertise !
Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release.
The artifacts are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-RC3/
The Maven artifacts are at:
On 6/24/2010 10:52 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Jakarta site still includes Taglibs in the downloads section.
OK if I remove all of those now?
snip/
Not sure. OOH, most of these are retired. OTOH, unlike some of the
On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
* BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going
to the Attic, and if not send it to Commons where it will have more
chance of activity.
Now that JSR-223 is part of Java
[X] -1, No because:
there are outstanding bugs that should be fixed and I would do that, but need
some time (land-under-water currently).
---rony
On 24.07.2011 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the
[x] +1, G'night Cactus
On 23.07.2011 20:25, Henri Yandell wrote:
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).
[ ] +1, G'night Cactus
[ ] -1, No because:
There's no activity in the project
On 24.07.2011 19:08, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
* BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge
On 06.08.2011 18:41, sebb wrote:
On 6 August 2011 08:40, Henri Yandell bay...@generationjava.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
On 24.07.2011 19:08, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G
Looking at activity since the turn of the year, I think it's more
likely that Harmony would be heading to the Attic someday. You never
know though - needs to be given time to see if things recover (someone
started committing a few patches in July).
I'm in favour of a BSF TLP. Assuming
Just a question: saw that BSF 2.4.1 got moved to commons (have checked
that out), but not BSF 3.0. Where is BSF 3.0 slated to go to?
All is in commons somewhere under
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bsf/branches/
Hen literally moved the BSF source tree to
... cut ...
Well, I would like to incorporate the changes in August such that an
updated (bug-fixed, and the enhancements incorportated) BSF 2.x can then
be put into the attic.
... cut ...
Another project (a language binding for D-Bus) took too much time, such
that I was not able to turn to
On 10.11.2011 19:01, Henri Yandell wrote:
A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to
close down the PMC.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1, because
+1
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
22 matches
Mail list logo
