- Original message
From: Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 22:58:55 +
Subject: RE: Indemnification of the PMC
Seems to me that part of the reason it is difficult to resolve
On Dec 28, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
* We need to put *all* the decision-markers on the PMC. At Jakarta,
that means *all* the committers, and
No, it doesn't. We need to put as many as possible, hopefully all, but
it's not required to be all. We can also have people that aren't
On Dec 28, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
* We need to put *all* the decision-markers on the PMC. At Jakarta,
that means *all* the committers, and
No, it doesn't. We need to put as many as possible, hopefully all, but
it's not required to be all. We can also have people that aren't
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
Ted but was written by someone else (in this case me, in the previous
case Stephen)
geir
On Dec 28, 2003, at 11:13 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
On Dec 28,
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
Ted but was written by someone else (in this case me, in the previous
case Stephen)
The two messages from Ted Husted that
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
Ted but was written by someone else (in this case me, in the previous
case Stephen)
The two messages from Ted Husted that concern you
:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Indemnification of the PMC
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
Ted but was written by someone else (in this case me, in the previous
case Stephen
. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:19:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Indemnification of the PMC
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
Ted
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the
same as a motion passed by the BOD.
Correct.
In fact, my understanding is that the role of PMC implies
no rights at all - just extra responsibility.
Is there
- Original message
From: Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 06:48:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Indemnification of the PMC
If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual
Stephen wrote,
For example, am I in writing this email, acting in the capacity of a PMC
member, a committer, or an individual?
Seems to me that part of the reason it is difficult to resolve the issues confronting
Jakarta is that several initial assumptions are required, and that these are
Geir :
If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the
same as a motion passed by the BOD. It is my understanding the BOD has
not passed any resolution that grants a PMC member any of the rights
implied by the message quoted below. In fact, my understanding is that
the
Stephen McConnell wrote:
If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the
same as a motion passed by the BOD.
Correct.
In fact, my understanding is that the role of PMC implies
no rights at all - just extra responsibility.
Is there anything concrete to suggest
Oh, and thanks to Noel for the links...
On Dec 23, 2003, at 6:49 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here is the clearest description I've found. It's by Roy Fielding, ex
chair and board member of the ASF, and from all appearances, extremely
knowledgeable in these matters. It was posted here :
14 matches
Mail list logo
