ld be a great place for some digital library
students and or IR researchers to come do work, but we need to get the word out
to them that we are looking for help.
>
> Itamar.
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2011, at
machine
>> learning approaches. The community is not very active, but
>> we don't expect it to be very high volume either as it is a niche
>> area.
>>
>> PyLucene
>>
>> PyLucene is a Python integration of Lucene Java. Development is
>> al
g to
have two speakers giving presentations related to Mahout: Ted Dunning, MapR
and Grant Ingersoll of Lucid Imagination (me). Both Ted and Grant are long
time committers on the Mahout project.
Ted's talk: How and why random projections work?
Mine: Using Mahout to Cluster, Classify a
or generating recommendations
> and any good papers that suggest any empirical evidence for the same ?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/MinHash-tp3428977p3428977.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Mahout-s-Flexibility-for-generating-recommendations-tp3280446p3283279.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
----
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidi
mahout-vectors-from-solr-index-tp3247141p3247141.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Grant Ingersoll
ords.txt" ignoreCase="true"/>
> ignoreCase="true"/>
>
>
>
> It has the LowerCaseFilterFactory in the query part AND in the index part,
> so I guessed it will convert my query to lowerCase and compare withe the
> words stored in lowercase, but obviously not.
>
> Moreover, I would like to have when I type "Britne", "britne" or "BriTnE"
> the result "Britney" (and not "britney"). How can I make my
> autocompleter/spellchecker *not case-sensitive* ?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolR-Spellchecking-Autocomplete-tp3243107p3243107.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Grant Ingersoll
OK, I intend to file the report in SVN tomorrow morning.
On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> Please fill out
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2011/board-report-june.txt
>> for the
Please fill out
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2011/board-report-june.txt
for the June Board Meeting on June 15th.
I've submitted the chair change resolution to the Board Agenda already, so we
should just need the PyLucene update and if anyone feels there are any issues
at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.loadDataConfig(DataImporter.java:178)
&
.nabble.com/how-to-integrate-Solr-for-search-into-my-Ecommerce-application-tp2930815p2952405.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Revolution -- Lucene and Solr User Conference
May 25-26 in San Francisco
www.lucenerevolution.org
tic (otis@...) -- Sematext
* Erik Hatcher (ehatcher@...) -- Lucid
* Chris Hostetter (hossman@...) -- Lucid
* Grant Ingersoll (gsingers@...) -- Lucid
* Mike McCandless (mikemccand@...) -- IBM
* Ryan McKinley (ryan@...) -- Voyager GIS (Lucid advisor)
* Mark Miller (markr
in building it? Is the source there? Is the jar
> there?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-create-a-mahout-project-in-Netbeans-tp2947117p2947117.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
w-to-integrate-Solr-for-search-into-my-Ecommerce-application-tp2930815p2946724.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
----
Grant Ingersoll
Join the LUCENE REVOLUTION
Lucene & Solr User Conference
May 25-26, San Francisco
www.lucenerevolution.org
Lucener's,
Thank you to everyone who has participated in this thread and the many others
during this time. I know it's been heated at times as well as painful. I also
know this is a pretty big and broad community and that we need to move forward
in a positive way (which I firmly believe we ar
ral mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--------
Grant Ingersoll
Join the LUCENE REVOLUTION
Lucene & Solr User Conference
May 25-26, San Francisco
www.lucenerevolution.org
On May 12, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>> I think the current state of logging only #lucene-dev is good.
>>
>> Yeah, except no one is on it other than a few people even though many of
>> them (committers that is) are on #lucene
>
> I haven't seen any technical discussions anymore on
; of a single place for these discussions on IRC and have that place be clear
> of user support questions.
>
> RE refactoring / modularization, it's good to finally see a sense of
> agreement on how to move forward.
>
> ~ David Smiley
>
> On May 12, 2011, at
been said on
>>>> IRC, b/c people would want answers ...
>>>>
>>>> I'm not against IRC, don't get me wrong. I think it's useful b/c the
>>>> turnaround time is great. But we should not have so many discussions there,
>
look to me like the response time is
>> instantaneous. We have very active people from around the globe, so you have
>> a high chance receiving response in no time. In the worse case, it will take
>> a couple of hours, but I don't remember when did that happen (which is an
>> amazin
, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> 2. I think we need to prioritize getting patch contributors more feedback
>>> sooner. I think some of this can be automated much like what Hadoop has
>>> done. This sh
I think it
removes any political pressure. Have I sold it enough? ;-) Besides, I just
know others are dying to file board reports on a quarterly basis!
More inline below...
On May 5, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> 2.
I would also encourage people to review ASF principals, by-laws, etc:
http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html
http://apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
http://apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html
http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
-Grant
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Gr
Due to the recent incidents related to committers reverting others patches and
the ongoing discussion/impasse around modularizing Solr as well as the Solr TLP
vote, the Board has asked the PMC to provide a special report as to the status
of the community and what constructive things we are doing
On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:43 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>
> But, this is important context to the discussion. Unfortunately, to
> the uninformed community, asf board, members etc, my behavior likely
> appears very irrational: but this is because they are unaware of these
> private emails (which many of u
-1. I don't think it solves anything and just makes it more likely that we
have duplicate functionality.
On Apr 26, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> A single merged project works only when people are relatively on the same
> page,
> and when people feel it's mutually beneficial. Recent
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/KEYS
>
> pps: here is my +1
--
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Revolution -- Lucene and Solr User Conference
May 25-26 in San Francisco
www.lucenerevolution.org
ccess.
--
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Revolution -- Lucene and Solr User Conference
May 25-26 in San Francisco
www.lucenerevolution.org
March 2011, Apache Solr 3.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 3.1.
This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and
improvements, some of which are highlighted below. The release is
available for immediate download at
http://www.apache.org/dy
March 2011, Apache Solr 3.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 3.1.
This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and
improvements, some of which are highlighted below. The release is
available for immediate download at
http://www.apache.org/dy
March 2011, Apache Lucene 3.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 3.1.
This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and
improvements, some of which are highlighted below. The release
is available for immediate download at
http://www.apache.org
ly the
document id).
> Is it the position of the searched term in a
> document, or the documents in which the term is included... or what ?
The latter. You can get to the former via a SpanQuery and the related Spans
object.
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidim
more
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Regards,
> Shivani
>
>
> Research Scholar,
> School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Purdue University
> West Lafayette IN
> web.ics.purdue.edu/~sgrao <http://web.ics.purdue.edu/%7Esgrao>
-
=== Lucene Status Report: Mar 2011 ===
TLP
Trademarks:
We have not made progress on trademarks since the last board report, but
do intend to finish the necessary pieces.
* Project Naming And Descriptions :
We believe this is complete, but are still reviewing.
* Website Navigation
Our Board Report is due on March 13th. I've checked in a draft in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2011
Please review and make edits as you see fit. I will file somewhere around the
11 or 12th.
-Grant
ng "ci".
>
>
> Can someone tell me how to do the equivalent of a MySQL LIKE statement in
> Solr/Lucene please?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> S
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Like-Stateme
hing-Multivalued-fileds-tp2233101p2233913.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
case itemname, with the position gap specified by the position
increment. If you didn't want them to match, you could use a phrase query with
a slop value less than the position increment.
-Grant
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for
>>>> : continuity f
earch url for
> accomplishing this?
>
> Thanks
> Mahesh
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-Exact-sentence-from-solr-highligh-fragment-tp2184926p2184926.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at
I'll Champion, but I don't think I will have time to mentor. Once most of it
is fleshed out, let's ask on gene...@incubator.a.o for mentors.
-Grant
On Dec 30, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Grant,
>
> I'm working on the proposal and have come to the final section where I
> must list
On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for
> : continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has
> : stagnated, there is actually a reasonably active user list, and this
> : resolution doesn't d
We will be putting most resources into a read-only mode, including SVN. I'm
fine with leaving the user mailing list up and running if that is desired. We
don't ever delete history here. You will still be able to download old
versions. As I said before, however, I really think some of you com
Hi Troy,
I appreciate the effort and I think what you are asking for in the end is
exactly how the Incubator process works. As I've stated several times before,
Incubation is a way for the Lucene.NET community to be on the path of a
self-determined PMC and to start with a clean slate of commit
On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> Resolution:
> Whereas the Lucene.NET project has stagnated due to lack of committer
> activity and,
> Whereas the Lucene PMC is no longer interested in maintaining the community
> due to lack of interest in working on
mean that this project cannot go back to the
Incubator or that it must die completely, it just means that the Lucene PMC is
discharging it's responsibility for the project by shutting down the resources
it is responsible for and removing commit access.
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene PMC Chair
see if the above makes a difference.
>
> My 0.02 NT
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Grant Ingersoll
>> To: gen
s not mean that this project cannot go back to the
Incubator or that it must die completely, it just means that the Lucene PMC is
discharging it's responsibility for the project by shutting down the resources
it is responsible for and removing commit access.
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene PMC Chair
On
On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : point, it's either the Attic or Incubator and I'm leaning toward Attic.
> : However, I think it makes sense to give one more chance by saying: You
> : have until January 31 to put together a proposal for going back to the
> : Incuba
On Dec 16, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> I think this sounds reasonable. Though I feel like you already sent
> out the same notice before.
>
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> The failure of any of the Lucene.NET comm
The failure of any of the Lucene.NET committers to respond to status request
for the Board Report this month doesn't exactly instill confidence in the life
of this project. Additionally, it seems several projects have forked off over
at Codeplex. I would appreciate hearing everyone's thoughts
Slight amendment. See snip below.
Thanks,
Grant
On Dec 12, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> Issues:
> The Lucene.NET subproject community has
> been stagnating for some time now and the PMC has stepped in and
> asked the community to respond to growing con
=== Lucene Status Report: Dec 2010 ===
TLP
Simon Willnauer and Koji Sekiguchi were added to the PMC.
This brings our total to 17 PMC members from 12 different
companies, spanning the globe. The flagship Lucene/Solr
has 26 total committers from 20 different companies, again
spanning the globe.
t; -
> Romi
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Why-do-we-use-Filters-tp2039246p2039246.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
George and Community,
I need the .NET Board Report update by tomorrow.
-Grant
Good catches. I'll make the changes.
On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Is in
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2010/board-report-dec.txt
>>
>> Comments and a
Is in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/board-reports/2010/board-report-dec.txt
Comments and additions welcome. In particular, I need reports from PyLucene
and Lucene.NET.
-Grant
We have a Board Report due this month. I will setup the placeholder in SVN.
We have two things we must address beyond the usual:
1. The Trademark stuff. I will take the lead on this.
2. Per the conversation on Lucene.NET's status, we expect a full report from
the .NET community in regards to th
I'm pleased to announce the addition of Simon Willnauer and Koji Sekiguchi to
the Lucene PMC. Both Simon and Koji have been long time
contributors/committers to both Lucene and Solr.
Congrats!
-Grant
en where can I find it and how can one update
> the documentation to reflect the changes?
>
>
> Shivani
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Shivani Rao wrote:
>>
>>> I see that there are two
opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-548
>
> Regards,
> Shivani
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Shivani Rao
>>
On Nov 18, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Shivani Rao wrote:
>
>> Ted ,
>> Thanks for your email. I understand that R reads values in text format.
>> I have a problem with dumping out data from Mahout.
>> The data spit out by apache mahout and its format
On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Ugo Scaiella wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
> May you tell me where you saw such estimates?
>
> Ugo
>
> 2010/11/18 Grant Ingersoll
>
>> Unfortunately, there isn't, since people don't have to let us know that
>> they
http://drupal.org/project/usage/luceneapi
> but a little bit more generic...
>
> Ugo
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
ddition, it doesn't give you any clue that this is the "Java"
> version.
>
> Also, isn't the full name suppose to be "Apache Lucene ..."? Shouldn't the
> vote be on the full name?
>
> -- George
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Grant I
Per the discuss thread and the fact that Java is TM Oracle, I would like us to
change "Lucene Java" to now be referred to as Lucene Core. The primary change
is on the website where the "Java" tab will now be the "Core" tab and other
mentions will be adjusted accordingly. I still expect we will
On Nov 9, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> Die, Contrib, die! We will hopefully only have modules soon?
>>
>> +1 to "Lucene Core", "Lucene Modules" and "Solr". As qualifier we can use
>> "for Java" to differentiate from .NET. But
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>> Do we even run on Harmony?
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Lucene
You da man, Muir!
On Nov 8, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Die, Contrib, die! We will hopefully only have modules soon?
+1
>
> +1 to "Lucene Core", "Lucene Modules" and "Solr".
+1
> As qualifier we can use "for Java" to differentiate from .NET.
.NET should be a TLP by the end of the year, early nex
On Nov 8, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> One name that might work is "Lucene".
Yeah, but then you have Lucene/Lucene as in the TLP being named Lucene.
>
> Let that mean the java version and slightly ambiguously refer to the entire
> project depending on context. Then use qualifiers
; is this of interest to anyone . if so please send me a cv
>
> kind regards
>
>> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:50:46 -0500
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core
>> From: ryan...@gmail.com
>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> +1
&
Hi Luceneers, esp. PMC and Committers,
I'm in the process of reviewing our branding per the Trademarks committee
sending out requirements. So, expect to see some changes to the website and
logos in the coming days as well as, potentially, a request for help.
Per the Branding Requirements at h
Just to be clear, there is a third option in all of this besides Attic or
Incubator and it is what I wrote in the original email. Remedy the 4 items
(quoted below) and then go to the Board to be a Top Level Project. Clearly,
the life in this thread shows that #1 can be met if people are willin
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Josh Handel wrote:
> One thing that has yet to be answered on this list is this :
>
> What does Apache Foundation provide, that the project does not received on
> its own OTHER than the name "Lucene".. I hear a lot of what Apache
> requests of us, beyond a name
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Granroth, Neal V. wrote:
> Huh? What I should have been clear and concise to anyone who has follow the
> project for the past several years.
>
> Lucene.Net has already been through the official process of being promoted
> out of incubator status. Why is it necessa
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Granroth, Neal V. wrote:
>
> We've already been through this process once before. Why repeat?
Because clearly it didn't take the first time and this time the goal is to
demonstrate the community can stand on its own two feet as an Apache Top Level
Project (TLP).
On Oct 30, 2010, at 11:07 PM, Michael Mitiaguin wrote:
> I've been using Lucene.Net since 2005 and know its history quite well. Just
> some comments :
>
> 1. What actually PMC expects ?
At this point, I think the PMC expects to see a plan and action for either
going back to Incubation and bec
On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
>
> Personally I don't care if Lucene.net is part of the ASF, in the incubator
> or hosted on CodePlex as standalone project, as long as there are releases,
> and some committers are working on it.
> Maybe Lucene.net could follow the same step
list, but I hope by doing so
> it gets some extra visibility.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- George
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 6:59 AM
> To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: ge
oing the heavy lifting of the project.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 4:48 PM
> To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Lucene mailing list; lucene-net-...@lucene
much about the way projects are run under the Apache umbrella,
> but I'm keen to ensure that Lucene.Net doesn't die :).
> Aaron Powell
> Umbraco Ninja
>
> http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype:
> aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
>
t with its own PMC so that its future direction
can be set by the stakeholders of the project and not by the larger Lucene
project as a whole.
Sincerely,
Grant Ingersoll
On behalf of the Lucene PMC
ntext:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/running-mahout-with-lucene-vector-produces-a-dictionary-output-only-tp1786351p1786351.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
by the larger Lucene
project as a whole.
Sincerely,
Grant Ingersoll
On behalf of the Lucene PMC
Hi All,
Just a couple of notes about ApacheCon next week for those who either are
attending or are thinking of attending.
1. There will be Lucene and Solr 2 day trainings done by Erik Hatcher (Solr)
and me (Lucene). It's not too late to sign up. See
http://na.apachecon.com/c/acna2010/schedul
It's on for Tuesday night.
On Oct 23, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I think I may be there. More news anon. Drinks and a meetup would be
> great.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> Is there interest in having a Meetup
Is there interest in having a Meetup at ApacheCon? Who's going? Would anyone
like to present? We could do something less formal, too, and just have drinks
and Q&A/networking. Thoughts?
-Grant
We need to review and take care of these things. For starters, we need a
Lucene powered by logo and we need TMs placed in all of the logos. I'll do a
more thorough review after ApacheCon.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Shane Curcuru
> Date: October 15, 2010 11:36:53 AM EDT
> To: p...@apach
nterested
> in getting the weights of all terms so that I can compute some statistics
> about the similarity among documents.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bill
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
+1
On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that the PMC has accepted Steven Rowe as Lucene/Solr
> committer!
>
> Welcome Steven!
>
> --
> Robert Muir
> rcm...@gmail.com
=== Lucene Status Report: Sept, 2010 ===
TLP
The Lucy project has been moved to Incubator where it intends to become a
TLP.
LUCENE JAVA/Solr
Lucene Java is a search-engine toolkit and Solr is a search server
built on top of Lucene. The community is very active.
The community is working toward
I intend to file the following Board Report for September tomorrow (Sept. 12)
unless I hear corrections, etc. In particular, Lucene.NET needs to step up and
report, as I have not heard from them.
=== Lucene Status Report: Sept, 2010 ===
TLP
The Lucy project has been moved to Incubator where i
I'll open a spot in SVN. Please add in your piece.
-Grant
ister now. Also please be aware that the early bird rate expires September
10.
Hope to see you there.
Cheers,
Grant
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> Recent events have pointed out that we only have a few moderators for
> several key mailing lists -- and in some cases those moderators are no
> longer active (or not as active as they'd like to be)
>
> It would be a good idea to try and a
In recognition of Robert's continuing contributions to Lucene and Solr, I'm
happy to announce Robert has accepted our invitation to join the Lucene PMC.
Cheers,
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene PMC Chair
+1
On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The first vote started on June 18th received two PMC votes and one user vote.
>
> A couple of bugs got fixed in the meantime so I'd like to call for another
> vote hoping for three PMC votes to make this release possible.
>
> ---
>
>
On Jun 17, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
>> I ask those things, b/c I think the answers will help us understand better
>> whether this is something the Lucene PMC is interested in status checking,
>> etc, to which it hasn't shown a track record of doing to date.
>
> My sense is that
On Jun 15, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 10:48 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Sounds like Doug is saying we should get a rough consensus from the PMC
>> on whether we want to put more effort into Lucy - not just abide its
>> existence as seems to have been the case.
>
> Yes, b
On Jun 14, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : Finally, given that Lucy undoubtedly is a separate community (if it ever
> : exists) with separate goals from Lucene and that it is considered ASF
> : best practice for PMC's to not be "umbrella" projects, I think we should
> : conside
1 - 100 of 417 matches
Mail list logo
