On 11.11.2008 14:52:52 sebb wrote:
On 11/11/2008, Shane Curcuru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to dropping 1.2 support.
+1 to dropping 1.2
+0 to dropping 1.3
I think 1.4 support should be kept if possible for a while yet.
Agreed. Xerces is such a basic library and so many companies are
On 11/11/2008, Shane Curcuru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to dropping 1.2 support.
+1 to dropping 1.2
+0 to dropping 1.3
I think 1.4 support should be kept if possible for a while yet.
Please - be sure that the main website clearly lists the last release we
think that Xerces worked on JDK
a new infusion of activity and interest.
you betcha, most of us would be up in arms!
I personally am stuck on 1.4.2 for the foreseeable future.
So +1 to drop 1.2/3 support, but let's not get too drastic please.
__
Franck Schmidlin
Corporate Integration Consultant
+1
I'd suggest just jumping to Java 5 library, source and target
compilation. I think this would give the project a new infusion of
activity and interest.
-Nathan
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Michael Glavassevich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
(including general@xml.apache.org on the cc
Any idea how this poll was done? A form you could submit on a website?
Jeremias, seeing your name as the last editor on the Wiki I'm guessing you
had something to do with it. Was this poll easy to set up?
Thanks.
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: [EMAIL
Shane Curcuru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/11/2008 08:08:50 AM:
+1 to dropping 1.2 support.
Please - be sure that the main website clearly lists the last release we
think that Xerces worked on JDK version x.y. Xerces is ubiquitous, and
is used directly or within other products virtually
Yes, Michael, I was the driving force behind that. I wanted to make sure
that we've made an informed decision before dropping support for one JDK
or another. Developers obviously like the new stuff but users are
sometimes stuck with old stuff. It often takes them a bit longer to
migrate although
