Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
+1 for the idea, but you don't have Apache Members there (neither Ian nor Jeff
are ASF members, as far as I know).
Hey Otis.
I'm a member. I just don't act like one ;-)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
---
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...i really like the idea but i'm pretty uncomfortable about having only
> one member as mentor. maybe we can find another mentor or two
I think another ASF member as a mentor would be enough, that would
make
> I think you're going to be in for some significant challenges in
> growing a community in what appears to be a fairly specialised field -
> but if you're up for that challenge I will be happy to mentor the
> project, so you can go ahead and add my name.
>
> Just to clarify - this is intended to b
On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:52:47 +0900, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems like Brett Porter is volunteering, see the other "Mentor recruit
for Hama project" thread, with this the issue would be solved IMHO.
And he forgot to vote here. Oh well, is it possible to be a mentor not
2008/5/19 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:52:47 +0900, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Seems like Brett Porter is volunteering, see the other "Mentor recruit
>> for Hama project" thread, with this the issue would be solved IMHO.
>
> And he forg
2008/5/19 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ...I thought there was only 1 mentor (Ian) previously?...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HamaProposal says:
Mentors
Ian Holsman, (ianh AT apache DOT org)
Jeff Eastman, (jeastman AT apache DOT org)
Brett Porter, (brett AT apache DO
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on accepting the Hama project for incubation...
+1
Personally, I'd appreciate having more information on the affiliations
of the initial committers. I know it is not currently a requirement,
but it's IMHO a
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> If the IP template should be RTC then it should be moved into the
> policy area. But IMO the incubator is not the right place for
> normative legal policy: the legal committee should maintain policy.
It probably embodies both procedure and policy. And I agree with
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> If the IP template should be RTC then it should be moved into the
>> policy area. But IMO the incubator is not the right place for
>> normative legal policy: the legal committee should ma
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...Personally, I'd appreciate having more information on the affiliations
>> of the initial committers
> ...Edward J. Yoon, (NHN, Master of Mathematics)
> Chanwit Kaewkasi, (Univ. of Manchester, Ph.D student in CS)
Thank you for your advices and for your vote.
> Personally, I'd appreciate having more information on the affiliations
> of the initial committers. I know it is not currently a requirement,
> but it's IMHO a good thing for the Incubator PMC to have an idea of
> the "weight" of affiliations in podl
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 18, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> apache needs a record of the checksummed artifact. this is likely to
>> be the zipped code.
>
> FTR, Apache only needs this if there is no other way to map t
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> ...Personally, I'd appreciate having more information on the affiliations
>>> of the initial committers
>
>> ...Edward J. Yoon, (NHN
Roland Weber wrote:
> Fair enough. The Proposal Guide says "Apache is interested
> only in communities." but that is not policy.
The Incubator exists to build communities. :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Roland Weber wrote:
> I doubt that a podling without three committers would even be accepted.
Sure it would, were there interest. And a photo gallery does happen to have
my own interest, as I have written software for the same problem domain, as
well as being an avid nature photographer and past
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roland Weber wrote:
>> Fair enough. The Proposal Guide says "Apache is interested
>> only in communities." but that is not policy.
>
> The Incubator exists to build communities. :-)
guides offer guidance not policy
- r
Ian Holsman is not yet member of the IPMC, However, Voting has now
been open for over 6 days with 3 binding +1 votes from Alex, Bertrand,
Brett to go along with the 3 committer +1 votes from Grant, Jeff,
Otis. No -1 votes or 0 votes were cast.
Thus, I'm closing this vote as "Passed".
Thanks to eve
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Holsman is not yet member of the IPMC, However, Voting has now
> been open for over 6 days with 3 binding +1 votes from Alex, Bertrand,
> Brett to go along with the 3 committer +1 votes from Grant, Jeff,
> Otis. No -1
> you missed my vote
Yes, Sorry for my carefulness.
> i'm a little uncomfortable about closing this VOTE so quickly given
> the low number of votes cast. projects typically end up spending a
> year or two in the incubator and the IPMC prefers to spend it's time
> considering it's decisions.
>
> p
CXF has graduated, Tuscany is before the Board this month to graduate. As
they leave, at least 4 new projects are under consideration for Incubation.
Roy has raised issues with the procedure for IP Clearance. The Legal
Committee has this week indicated that they've no problems with the changes
p
+1
Niall
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMC,
>
> There has been some discussion around the Hama proposal,
> and we would now like to officially propose Hama to the Incubator
> for consideration, with Grant Ingersoll's +1.
>
> Please vo
Hi,
+1 Accept Hama as a new podling
Sorry for the late vote. I was initially a bit confused about whether
Hama should be "just" a Hadoop component from the beginning or if full
incubation is needed, but the answer to Brett's question covered my
concerns well.
In general I'm quite excited to see
Noel,
Would you be willing to Champion the proposal? There is interest at
Roller to write a plugin for the software and I am working on writing
the proposal for that as well. I think that this software is best as
its own project though because it could get very big.
Angie
At 08:59 AM 5/19
Wearing my more ametur photographer heat, I have interest on this
project, and would like to contribute to it. In the past couple weeks,
I've been planning to do a simple photo gallery application that would
demo the Tuscany/SCA Web 2.0 capabilities, but looks like I could
apply some of my ideas to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598019#action_12598019
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on INCUBATOR-74:
+1
> IP Clearance Temp
Luciano,
I would welcome the help and the interest is great. As this isn't
currently open source, I don't have a mail list to direct you
to. However, feel free to chime in on the Caitrin proposal on the
incubator wiki with additional features you would like to see. If
there are more people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598030#action_12598030
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on INCUBATOR-74:
Wheels are starting to t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598032#action_12598032
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on INCUBATOR-74:
Please jump with comment
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>> > Given that we now have a Legal Committee, any substantive revision of
>> that
>>> > form should be
There has been some interest shown in the Caitrin project. There are
2 people at Roller who have shown interest in creating a plugin for
photo gallery software to be used with Roller. There is one person
on the general list who has stated they are willing to
contribute. While this is not a l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598051#action_12598051
]
Craig Russell commented on INCUBATOR-74:
Three things that might be relevant in h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598064#action_12598064
]
Doug Cutting commented on INCUBATOR-74:
---
> I'd like to know if there is any connect
Its been 5 days now so I'm going to call this...passed with 19 +1s from:
Noel J. Bergman, Carl Trieloff, Niklas Gustavsson, Robert Burrell Donkin,
Niall Pemberton, Jean T. Anderson, Craig L Russell, Paul Fremantle, Kevan
Miller, Guillaume Nodet, Vamsavardhana Reddy, Sam Ruby, Martijn Dashorst,
Mat
Again, The vote has now, IMO, had enough time to run. (for one week)
We had 7 binding +1s, from Alex Karasulu, Bertrand Delacretaz, Brett
Porter, Robert Burrell Donkin, Niall Pemberton, Jukka Zitting, Ian
Holsman (potentially) to go along with the 3 committer +1 votes from
Grant Ingersoll, Jeff Ea
Hi!
My name is Jihoon Kim and I would like to propose a subproject
regarding Flex and JSF integration.
I have originally posted a JIRA regarding the contribution within the
Apache MyFaces project. But since I was the sole developer that wrote
the code, the members within the community have asked
35 matches
Mail list logo
