On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jukka! Can someone else please have a look? -- we're still one vote
shy.
-T
Is this still waiting for a vote? If so i can go take a look.
...ant
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:26 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/09/2009, Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de wrote:
Hi,
The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of PDFBox.
The release
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:41 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jukka! Can someone else please have a look? -- we're still one vote
shy.
-T
Is this still waiting for a vote? If so i can go take a look
+1
...ant
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:33 AM, George Aroush geo...@aroush.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
On behalf of Lucene.Net mentor, committers and community, this is a vote
call to graduate the Lucene.Net project
(http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/) as a sub-project under Apache
Lucene.
+1
...ant
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable,
+1. Congrats on 1.0.
Note the key used to sign the artifacts is not published to a public
key server so you may want to do that before the artifacts go live.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#public-key-not-found
...ant
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
+1, sounds really interesting, I'd be happy to be a mentor too if you
need another.
...ant
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
This looks interesting, I'd be happy to help Mentor and have already put my
name down.
Gav...
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk bryant@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Leo,
Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
Looks good to me +1
...ant
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo nlgal...@us.ibm.comwrote:
Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated.
In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink
community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just
WebSphere - REST WebServices Development
nlgal...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
[image: Inactive hide details for ant elder ---11/09/2009 08:43:50
AM---Looks good to me +1]ant elder ---11/09/2009 08:43:50 AM---Looks good
to me +1
*ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello IPMC,
The Subversion podling would like a waiver of the requirement to make
a release before graduation.
As we understand this requirement, it is present in order to
demonstrate to the podling how releases are made at
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and how
they use RTC.
This appears to be where it came from:
http://markmail.org/message/d45dmasuwnda25wd
so about 6 months ago to try to help with
I agree with that. And before graduation I think it might be worth
trying to get CTR used more, they do seem open this -
http://markmail.org/message/i255ekzxpuesow44
...ant
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Not a strong opinion, but I think that RTC hampers
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 07:16 +, ant elder wrote:
so about 6 months ago to try to help with problems they were having,
and since then 99% of the commits have been made by only two people.
I assume you're referring
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
So about 40% of the committed code is coming from others and reviewed
by others - great - why not make some of those others committers?
It's a long
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in
+1
...ant
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
reto.bachm...@trialox.org wrote:
Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache
Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and
as a wiki page at
I'm not sure I've ever seen PPMC members listed anywhere, the only way
i've found them is from the subscribers to the poddlings private list.
...ant
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
ping? anyone know the answer?
I can't find the file referenced, nor can I
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org wrote:
The log4php PPMC vote was opened on log4php-dev at Nov 27, 2009 and closed at
Dec 4, 2009. Binding +1 votes were received from Christian Grobmeier,
Christian Hammers and Curt Arnold. No other votes were received.
The
+1
...ant
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-beta2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable,
A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1]
Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended
to graduate to Apache Commons and replace the existing Validator 1.x
component as a new 2.0 codebase, from the discussion on commons-dev
everyone seems fine
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1]
Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi Kevan,
Responses below:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the license for the file: doc/thrift.tex?
This was contributed by Facebook, and thus falls under the
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
...Podlings PPMCs are reflected somewhere in asf-authorization? How so? In
any
case Eric is part of the Cassandra PPMC and I can
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
The Board has in the past condemned balkanization of community, and my
take on this situation is exactly that.
This is not yet another web framework, which often brought forward as
examples that the ASF encourages
+1
...ant
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not quite the scenario. We have a *dormant* component
(validator) in Commons and a couple of ASF committers (not commons
committers) have shown up proposing to re-write that component to
implement the
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-rc3. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable,
+1
The Java src archive seems to include some of the binary artifacts (eg
webapp.war), the license/notice covers everything so its not an issue
just pointing it out in case its not intentional.
...ant
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Shanti Subramanyam
shanti.subraman...@gmail.com wrote:
A
+1
...ant
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Neeraj Joshi jnee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi All,
We still need two more binding votes for our first release. Would really
appreciate it if anyone can take some time to review our release.
Thanks
Neeraj
~
I had a quick look at things like mailing list activity, votes,
releases, committers, commits etc, looks good to go to me.
...ant
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:04 -0500, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi folks
FYI, the Shindig
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Shindig
as a TLP [1].
I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of
Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to
+1
...ant
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Neeraj Joshi jnee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The Imperius community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Imperius 1.0.0.
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
Imperius is a rule-based policy
I echo Matthieu's comments about Cassandra being ready to graduate,
I'll vote +1 for it in a vote. Not sure if that PMC list is actually
the complete list as I thought there was talk of adding others, i'll
ask about it on their private list.
...ant
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Matthias
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
Greetings,
The Cassandra community has successfully voted for graduation[1]. Before
calling for a recommendation vote, I'd like to see if anyone here has
any concerns or objections, or has any feedback on the draft
It is quite huge. I haven't looked at every artifact but the ones i
did all the licensing etc looked ok and it looks like they understand
what they're doing. The copyright in some NOTICE files is Copyright
2006, 2007 which could probably do with being updated, though others
are 2009 and from the
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
Greetings,
We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
active mentors to the proposed PMC, (for a total of 7 people), then ran
that through a new community vote[2].
[1]
+1
...ant
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stuart Monteith stuk...@stoo.me.uk wrote:
The Kato community has voted to release Kato M1-incubating. We now request
the
Incubator PMC for a vote.
The proposed release artifacts are located at:
+1
...ant
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our first release,
0.2.0. As required by Incubator policy, we need IPMC approval for
this release. There is a concurrent release vote ongoing on
+1
...ant
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
* Gavin McDonald
* Christian Hammers
* Jim Jagielski
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Traffic Server PPMC has voted on and approved the release of TS
v2.0.0-alpha. We would now like to request the approval from the Incubator
PMC for this release. The original vote thread is
Message-ID:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Leif Hedstrom l...@ogre.com wrote:
On 03/08/2010 05:09 PM, ant elder wrote:
O
I had a look. Unfortunately the main release artifact
apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha.tar.bz2 is missing the top
level LICENSE and NOTICE files. Those are mentioned
Looks ok to me, +1.
As an aside there are still Java package names that are using com.sun
instead of org.apache, are they going to be changed before graduation
(I forget what the feeling is about this these days in the Incubator
PMC)?
...ant
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Jukka Zitting
+1
One minor nit is the Changes file still talks about 0.3.0.
...ant
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/libcloud-0.3.1/
Please test and place your votes please;
+1
...ant
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (again).
Could someone from the IPMC take a look at the release? The team is
eager to release it, but lacks 2 +1 binding votes.
Martijn
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Rainer Döbele
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home page:
The Aries project is delivering a set of pluggable Java components
enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. This
includes
Ok thanks I see them now.
Looks good to me, +1
...ant
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries community has voted
Looks ok to me, +1
...ant
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
I should have mentioned this,
Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from:
Davanum Srinivas
Kevan Miller
Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass.
+1
...ant
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:45 AM, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote
for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2]
I _think_ I've added everybody who expressed interest
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's second milestone
release (PhotArk M2-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval
to
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as documented at
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Les Hazlewood l...@hazlewood.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
not enough
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose the Nuvem project for addition to the Apache
incubator.
The initial proposal is available at the the
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:54, Eric Yang ey...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Besides DOAP file and the incubator nomenclature, I may need help identify
the addition responsibilities for Apache PMC. One problem,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
website/svn/MLs because I think
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Fair point.
The naming debate is only about the location of the project in svn and
the mailing lists, right? Conducting
How about keeping it here at the Incubator? It could be a showcase
project that demonstrates how to do things like releases, as well as
an eat your own dog food type place to help avoid any unnecessarily
burdensome IPMC processes and procedures ;)
...ant
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-08-10, ant elder wrote:
How about keeping it here at the Incubator?
I was going to suggest that as well - as a subproject, not as an eternal
podling. But I understand Ross point of sending the wrong signal
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have a
RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on the
team that would be able to? Hen files them
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The second idea is more controversial: to hold IPMC votes to
admit all significant committers to those projects to the IPMC
itself. The purpose of this concept is to allow those who
best know the codebase to provide
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Ant,
My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals from ppmc's
who end up in ipmc would help build bridges between podlings and will help
get lessons learned (when any ppmc has
Looks good to me too, i can't see anything at all to comment on.
+1
...ant
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Signature/checksums, build, source (RAT), and general snooping around with
emacs all looked good. Thanks Donald!
--kevan
On Aug
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
community has voted (see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
and would like to
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant proposed that we simply go from LCF to ACF at that time, and
posted accordingly to this group. He received several positive responses,
and only one that raised any concerns. After a week's delay, we presumed
that
I've had a look, and it all looks good. The licensing and legal doc in
the artifacts looks fine, the sigs verify, src builds etc.
+1
...ant
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Gabriele Columbro gabri...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Incubator PMC members,
on behalf of the Chemistry dev team, I'd
Looks ok, +1.
The binary jar whirr-cli-0.1.0-incubating.jar is missing the incubator
DISCLAIMER file but that file is in the other artifacts like the src
distro so i guess its enough to just fix that next time. Its also a
bit hard to work out if all the licenses are included for all the
stuff
the following comments from IPMC members during the
RC #1 VOTE:
- add Incubator disclaimer per comments from Ant Elder.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers
- add JDOM license to NOTICE.txt and upgrade to apache parent 7 per comments
from Mark Struberg.
- note
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Ant,
Thanks. Do you see any of the below as a blocker to the first release? What
extra stuff, specifically, do you see that wasn’t present in the prior where
that you +1’ed and thought was OK as
-incubating/rc3/
This release addresses the following comments from IPMC members during the
RC #2 VOTE:
From Ant Elder:
In NOTICE file
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sis/tags/0.1-incubating/NOTICE.txt
everything after the line The Apache Software Foundation
(http://www.apache.org
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from Incubator PMC members or a separate Incubator PMC vote.
As justification,
+1
...ant
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can
be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied
below.
[ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Assuming that no one comes forward with a significant reason to disallow
this, I'd just request that you not call a VOTE until you have an update to
the incubator page that describes the process.
In other words,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 22:45, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:47, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
...
OK - Have they
+1
...ant
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set of
artifacts and now would like an Incubator vote. Since this is our first
release, extra attention to detail is appreciated.
You can find the
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
- I have made no changes to NOTICE and LICENSE, because the incubator
and community advice seemed contradictory. I would like a general
sense of how many people feel that the current NOTICE and LICENSE
files are
to indicate that. Otherwise, the preamble will just be deleted.
Karl
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:06 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
- I have made no changes to NOTICE and LICENSE, because the incubator
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I've attached a new proposed version of README.txt, NOTICE.TXT, and
LICENSE.txt. Any further comments?
Karl
These look good to me.
Its a long thread so a bit hard to keep track of without a new RC but
i think what you
+1
...ant
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Jerry Chen je...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
With 6x +1 votes (including 2 binding), and no -1 votes, the vote seeks the
approval of the IPMC.
Thanks,
Jerry
On Jan 8, 2011, at 12:10 AM, Jerry Chen wrote:
Hi all,
Test tarballs for Apache
By my count libcloud still needs one more binding +1 for this release,
does any other Incubator PMC member have a minute to review and vote?
...ant
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:46 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
...ant
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Jerry Chen je
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
What specific questions you have ? Is it the project calling
themselves Apache Libcloud without a incubating disclaimer ?
That's the main one,
+1 from me.
Though a little reluctantly because while it looks mostly good the
chemistry-opencmis-client-impl-0.2.0-incubating-with-dependencies.zip
does not include the text of all the licenses of the included
dependencies it only has URLs to the license text. I thought including
the full
+1 to releasing most of this. I do think the duplicate and incorrect
legal files should be cleaned up as Stefan commented, and because of
those the webapp modules in the maven repo look like they have ended
up with the wrong license/notice files. I also think it would be
better to change from
+1
You only have two mentors, if you need a third i would help out.
...ant
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote:
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by
the Ant PMC for a new EasyAnt podling.
The proposal is
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the votes! Still need one more binding +1...
Karl
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Karl,
+1 from me (binding).
Signatures
DEPENDENCIES file are generated
according to that logic.
Thanks for any comment!
Gab
On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:22 PM, ant elder wrote:
+1 from me.
Though a little reluctantly because while it looks mostly good the
chemistry-opencmis-client-impl-0.2.0-incubating-with-dependencies.zip
does
Did you see the -1 vote from Stefan -
http://apache.markmail.org/message/bba6t6xifdgfwwxg
Probably need to address that, even if its just to ask lets just fix
it in the next release.
...ant
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Jeff Potts jeffpott...@gmail.com wrote:
Incubator PMC members,
This
If it helps to save a little time, a lot of times people run votes,
especially second votes, in parallel on both the dev list and general@
by just CC'ing both on the vote email.
...ant
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Jeff Potts jeffpott...@gmail.com wrote:
I am withdrawing this vote based on
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
It's my understanding that all voting takes place during a 72 hour period.
If that period ends on a weekend then it's customary to wait until Monday to
complete.
I don't see this documented on
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
However there might be a name conflict with the Howl transaction log over at
object web here:
http://howl.ow2.org/
http://howl.ow2.org/Originally from the
information on
the site could make you think Apple did exactly that.
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:17 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
However
+1
...ant
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good
shape so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the
Incubator.
The proposal is at:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote:
== Rationale ==
MRUnit has existed as a contrib component of Apache Hadoop. This has served
to introduce users to the library and to provide necessary functionality to
developers in the form of development support. That
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Guys,
I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for
a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce
seems like it would help give it a better
As commented in the proposal thread I'm pretty dubious that incubation
is the best approach for this, so i vote 0.
The potential committers for MRUnit are MapReduce users and developers
so moving this away and having separate mailing lists means they'll
lose all sight of it. At the very least I
Looks good to me, +1.
It would be nice to include some sort of release notes or changes file
within the distributions
...ant
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is
available and ready for
1 - 100 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
