-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
Submission date: 12 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @ RogueWave
dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com)
(0) rationale
The goal of the Apache C++ Standard
At 03:43 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote:
GNU libstdc++ is a fine implementation of the standard but its
big limitation is its dependency on gcc. What differentiates
our implementation is its portability to all the other compilers
besides gcc, which on most platforms other than Linux is still
an
At 06:45 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can you give us a sense of the 'currently' supported platforms
and compilers?
The C++ Standard Library project has been ported to the following
compilers and operating systems:[...]
That said, I'm suitably impressed with how
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:55:01PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm willing to serve as either mentor or ppmc member, as you will.
+1 to STDCXX -entering- incubation.
Glad to hear it. You can help me and Ben help them. =)
It's been pointed out that mentors should be on the Incubator
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:38 PM +0200 Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz (justin @ erenkrantz dot-com)
Which is why having another mentor or two might be a good idea? We still
haven't ironed out the justin-cloning proces AFAICT :-)
I volunteered
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1
The proposal says that this library has a complete locale
implementation. I'm wondering about the possibilities for code reuse
when/if we start on a second generation of
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Heidi Buelow
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 6:40 PM
Ok. I'll have to get back to you on this for the strict legal
requirements.
My understanding is that you are right that this HP statement is not
required in every source file.
Justin summarized this
Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13-05-2005 23:27, Heidi Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
Kewl. Seems like a big undertaking :-)
(...)
(5) identify apache sponsoring individual
Justin Erenkrantz (justin @ erenkrantz dot-com)
Which is why having another
--On Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:38 PM +0200 Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz (justin @ erenkrantz dot-com)
Which is why having another mentor or two might be a good idea? We still
haven't ironed out the justin-cloning proces AFAICT :-)
I volunteered initially to start the process
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:27:28PM -0500, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
I saw the HP licensing note below, which seems fine; but, if the
library was provided by other vendors, can you clarify the state of
any other IP claims on the initial contribution?
I've been informed that Rogue Wave and HP are the
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:27:28PM -0500, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
One other comment that I should make now:
The APR PMC was privately approached about sponsoring this proposal. The
PMC's consensus was that there was not sufficient
Big +1 (non-binding)
-Brian
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
Submission date: 12 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @
RogueWave
dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com)
(0) rationale
The goal of the Apache C++
Heidi,
This looks great. A few notes/questions inline below.
Cliff
On 5/13/05, Heidi Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
snip/
Rogue Wave Software will jump start this project by contributing the
commercial C++ Standard Library
16 matches
Mail list logo
