Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:31:32 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto > > Alex McLintock wrote: > > > At 17:41 21/01

Re: Forum Software.

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Robert Simmons wrote: > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:52:12 +0100 > From: Robert Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Forum Software. > > Then how do you answer the followin

Re: No reply from root

On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Jeffrey Dever wrote: > Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:22:01 -0500 > From: Jeffrey Dever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: No reply from root > > I am the release prime for the commons

Re: [Fwd: Maven as a top-level apache project]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Dan Diephouse wrote: > > 4. Can ASF Projects use Sun BCL licensed products? > > Yes, but ASF can't distribute them. > Each product you download from Sun's java.sun.com web site has a license that you have to agree to in order to download that JAR. In the case of several com

Re: Licensing again.

On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Ellis Teer wrote: > Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:41:54 -0800 > From: Ellis Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Licensing again. > > Ditto plus some, > > Seeing the license iss

Re: Licensing again.

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Timothy Halloran wrote: > Date: 10 Feb 2003 13:43:24 -0500 > From: Timothy Halloran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Licensing again. > > Does this mean the ASF has taken aw

Re: Karma for jakarta-site2

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Jeffrey D. Brekke wrote: > Date: 23 Feb 2003 21:41:06 -0600 > From: Jeffrey D. Brekke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Karma for jakarta-site2 > > > I recently was involved with the release of Commons

Re: Karma request jakarta-site2

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:12:51 -0600 > From: "O'brien, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Karma request jakarta-site2 > > Was trying to add my name t

RE: Karma request jakarta-site2

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:33:13 -0500 > From: Howard M. Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Karma request jakarta-site2 > > I'd like

Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects?

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:09:14 -0500 > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects? > > Thanks Pier

Re: [PATCH] promoted sub-projects

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Danny Angus wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:11:17 - > From: Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PATCH] promoted sub-projects > > Although I've got karma I thoug

Re: Adminitrivia: Assigning new bugs to the "list"

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:44:26 -0500 > From: Howard M. Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Adminitrivia: Assigning new bugs to the "list" >

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400 > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email ad

Re: Issues with XMLBeans proposal

Snipping to an issue I have with one particular comment. On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > In summary the most serious issues to this proposal are: > > 1. diversity of committership. I'd personally like to see >51% of the > ACTIVE committership from a different company. So long a

Re: karma anyone?

In general, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a good place, but I've filled in some blanks where I could. On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Nathan Bubna wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 21:03:31 -0700 > From: Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

Re: [ERR] [ANN] Cactus 1.5-beta1 has been released

n On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:44:34 +0900 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ERR] [ANN] Cactus 1.5-beta1 has been released > > Transmit Report: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: Changes to the jakarta-site

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > Date: 04 Sep 2003 10:49:50 +0200 > From: Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Changes to the jakarta-site > > Hi, > > I'd

Re: Forrest skin for Jakarta-XX project

Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: (What about Struts?) At the moment, Struts uses hand-crafted XSLT stylesheets that preceeded the existence of Forrest (and Maven), but we are considering some alternatives based on both Forrest's and Maven's site generation facilities. Some proof-of-concept prototyp

Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Part of the proposal indicates the jakarta-commons is not the right home for > HiveMind, as it does not fit in with the charter of the commons (too many > dependencies, etc.). > Even if it were proposed that Hivemind stay in jakarta-commons, I do not share Martin's c

Re: Confused with PMCs, TLPs, ASF and Power?

Quoting Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Then try this: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges > > It aims to be a starter course on why discssions about PMCs, TLPs, Jakarta > and the ASF appear, and possibly how they affect you. Be aware of the > disc

Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project?

Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Could someone please explain the motivation behind the creation of Jakarta > and how it got to where > it is today? May be that would help answer some of the questions we have? > > -Harish > These comments are going to be (like anyone's would

RE: Why you *want* to be on the PMC

Quoting "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > If all the PMC's share the same website, who is responsible > > for the website as a global concept. For example, the need > > to do mirrors. > > > If a Jakarta-Site PMC exists, all other PMCs [jakarta sub-project based]

Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project?

Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks Craig, this is elaborate, informative and puts the issue in my > perspective. May be this > should be put on the website too somewhere. > > Here are my inferences so far... > > > ASF is a group of projects administered by the Apache boa

Re: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

Quoting "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask > the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8. > The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too > long without a public release. > > [X

RE: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

Quoting Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release > > >

Re: [License] for jars in CVS

Quoting Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > I see what you are saying, but why is this an issue only with OGNL? Is it > because of license > > incompatibilities? 'Cause there are other jars in CVS both Apache and > non-Apache. > Harish, > > It isn't only an issue with OGNL, it is a g

Re: Differences

Quoting Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ted Husted wrote: > > >Perhaps once most of the Committers are on the PMC list, we can move the > administrative nonsense there again, and let the General list be the General > list again :) > > > > > > Looking forward to it. Do not remember when

Re: The Name Jakarta

Quoting Uncle Roastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Why/how was the name Jakarta choosen? > > Thanks, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] It was the name of the conference room at Sun where a large number of the discussions about the original formation of the project, as well as the contribution of Tomcat from Sun t

Re: jakarta-site karma?

Quoting Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In order to finally make an official mirrored release of Lucene 1.3, I > need jakarta-site karma so that I can update binindex and sourceindex. > > Would the powers that be please grant me this? > > Thanks, > Erik > Done. Craig

Re: Using apache feather logo

Quoting TANAKA Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I,m Yoshi TANAKA, a member of Japanese Jakarta user's group. > We're planning to make our stickers for give-aways to attendees at > Java Technology Conference in Japan to be held next week. > We'd like to include your feather logo into our stickers.

Re: questions license for site documents

Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:24:02 + > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out > > there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd be > > inclined to add both formulat

Re: questions license for site documents

Quoting Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You're not saying that the boilerplate text should appear as comment in > every generated HTML document, are you? > Yes, I am. For the same reason that it's in every Java file. > Cheers, > Chris Craig -

Re: boilerplate LICENSE text in different formats

Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:37:48 -0500 > Shapira, Yoav wrote: > > > >I have started a wiki page at > > >http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LicenseFormats for boilerplate text > > in > > >different formats. > > Cool and useful -- thanks ;) > > Ditto. :-)

Re: [VOTE] HiveMind as a Jakarta sub-project

> > [X] +1 I support this proposal > [ ] -1 I don't support this proposal > [ ] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal > Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.0 Beta 1 Released

I am please to announce the release of Version 1.0-beta-1 of the Struts Framework. Struts is an open source project, under the sponsorship of the Apache Software Foundation, to produce framework useful in building web applications with Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages (JSP) technology. Struts en

Re: Nominations for the Jakata PMC - roll call

Sam Ruby wrote: On the road, sorry for the late response... > > The nominees are > >[+0] Peter Donald >[+1] Diane Holt >[+1] Ted Husted >[+1] Ceki Gülcü >[+1] Geir Magnusson Jr. >[+0] Daniel F. Savarese >[+1] Jason van Zyl > > - Sam Ruby Craig

Re: PMC meeting agenda

On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Sam Ruby wrote: > Can we make this month's meeting on Friday? (Sorry Peter). Via IRC as Jon > has suggested... > Friday is fine for me (still 20:00 GMT?) -- please send the contact details privately. > > - Sam Ruby > Craig McClanahan ---

Re: [NOTICE] + [PROPOSAL] nightly builds + nightly source checkouts

On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Hey all, > > > [NOTICE] > Brian asked me to remind you to clean up the nightly builds so that we don't > have tons of old stuff eating up disk space. > > Example: > /x2/www/jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/nightly > > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/

Re: session question

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-9] Altuð Altýntaþ (Koç.Net) wrote: > Hi , > > i have got two contexts , one of them is VARDIYA and other one is CIS. > Two of these contexts are implemented by using session object . > You will do much better asking Tomcat-related questions on the TOMCAT-US

RE: Struts, velocity, turbine, jetspeed, lions, tigers and bears...oh my

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Kuster, Egon wrote: > Thanks for the welcome. now it is time to start learning how to use turbine. > Fun. > Turbine + Jetspeed is a great combination if your application needs the kinds of features they offer. But if the best argument for Turbine is that "JSP sucks balls

Re: New Subprojects

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > on 3/22/01 7:23 PM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No it couldn't from what I understand. Commons won't allow imports directly > > from turbine/avalon and to try to do such a complex system generic from > > start may be a bit of a PITA

Re: New Subprojects

On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Peter Donald wrote: > You mean discuss a strategy that components should conform to so as to > interact with other frameworks? ... And if components don't implement this > strategy (aka standard) do they go straight to jail without passing go and > without collecting $200? >

Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF

Catching up on this thread quite late, but ... On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > > It's a pity if I have to change the name ... I would of course very much > prefer to keep it. But I can see your point. Let's wait for others to > comment on that. > The formal way to check Sun's pos

Re: Sun Article On Velocity

On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Velocity 1.0 will be released on Monday 4-2-01 (the article was published > early). > > > > :-) > Congrats on your upcoming release! And it's refreshing to see Jon type a smiley after typing

[ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the next generation of the Tomcat servlet container, at: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-b2/ Tomcat 4.0 beta 2 has many new features, including: * Tomcat 4.0 can now run web applications out of an

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Kief Morris wrote: > Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 11:26 PM 3/30/2001 -0800 > >I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the > >next generation of the Tomcat servlet container, > > Rockin'! So can we co

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Willie Wheeler wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Kief Morris wrote: > > > Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 11:26 PM 3/30/2001 -0800 > > >I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Beta 2 release of the > > >next generat

Tomcat 4.0-beta-3 Released (SECURITY VULNERABILITY)

Tomcat 4.0-beta-3 is an update to the Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 distribution that was released on 30 March 2001. It fixes a further security vulnerability related to potentially exposing JSP source that was only partially corrected in beta 2. Anyone using versions of Tomcat 4.0 earlier than the beta 3 r

Re: Binaries in CVS

Whether or not there is a nice, easy, "all in one" download with everything you need has absolutely nothing to do with whether binaries are checked into CVS. I haven't heard anyone dispute the former -- only the latter. Why are you linking the two issues? Craig On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [is

Re: Next PMC meeting times?

On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > At 11:42 12.04.2001 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > >At the last PMC meeting we scheduled the next PMC meeting for Monday, 16 > >April 2001 at 1900 GMT. Now that daylight savings time has swapped > >hemispheres, it might make sense to revisit this

Re: Binaries in CVS

On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > At 11:25 12.04.2001 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > >Whether or not there is a nice, easy, "all in one" download with > >everything you need has absolutely nothing to do with whethe

Re: Binaries in CVS

On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > At 12:55 12.04.2001 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > [removed text] > > >> Why do you think that it is wrong to have binaries in CVS? > >> > > > >All the disadvantages you listed. > &g

Re: Binaries in CVS

On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Peter Donald wrote: > At 08:16 12/4/01 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > >If you accept that you are in a world where interfaces that you are > >depending on change frequently, then the problem to solve is optimizing the > >communication paths. > > > >I don't accept that reality. > >

Re: Binaries in CVS

On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > Peter Donald wrote: > > > > > > The fact of the matter is you would contribute to it even if you had to > > > pass the 12 heculean tests of power, jump tall buildings at lunch and > > beat > > > deep blue on your breaks .

Re: Binaries in CVS

On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > > > >* How are you measuring "activity"? I would guess from your statement > > that you are talking about developers doing commits -- but what about > > they users who just want to USE your project in their own work and could > > give a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta-Turbine-Jyve

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > on 5/5/01 9:54 AM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think this is an important question, since the natural outcome of our > > providing open source frameworks is that people will eventually provide > > open source applications based on th

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > > I have asked this before but is there a need for an intermediary > directory? For example, to take an example I am familiar with, Tomcat > 4.x, a damn good project I might add, has a build/ directory and a > dist/ directory where dist/ is a

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > At 10:02 07.05.2001 -0700, you wrote: > >On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > > > >> > >> I have asked this before but is there a need for an intermediary > >> directory? For example, to take an example I am familiar with, To

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

On Tue, 8 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > At 18:36 08.05.2001 +1000, you wrote: > >At 08:31 8/5/01 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > >>At 08:36 08.05.2001 +1000, you wrote: > >>>At 06:09 7/5/01 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > >Unfortunately half projects use "build" for (1) and half use it

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

On Tue, 8 May 2001, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote: > > Agreed. Mandating that the docs contained in the distribution and the > docs available on the jakarta web server match exactly is too > restrictive. +1 -- it should be up to the project. I've got projects that do it both ways. > However

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

On Tue, 8 May 2001, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Hi Craig, > > >Ceki, could you expand on why you're objecting to the multistage > build >process? I'm with Peter on this one ... multi-stage builds > save time for >the developers (because they do the minimum amount of > work required), and >also make t

[ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0-beta-4 Released

Tomcat 4.0-beta-4 is the latest update to the next generation version of Tomcat 4.0. It supports the most recent specification updates (Servlet 2.3 Proposed Final Draft 2, JavaServer Pages 1.2 Proposed Final Draft 2), support for looking up users and roles in a JNDI-accessed directory server, and

Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me > start one. I seem to be good at that. :-) > > What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and > migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of j

Re: Tomcat as webserver

Your best bet would be to ask Tomcat-specific questions like this on the TOMCAT-USER mailing list (send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe). You'll find thousands of people there who use Tomcat in a large variety of ways, including as a stand alone server. Craig McClanahan On F

Struts 1.0-beta-2 Released

Struts 1.0-beta-2 is an update release in preparation for a final release of Struts 1.0 prior to JavaOne 2001. The changes included are documented in the release notes, at: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/release-notes-1.0-b2.html You can pick up your copy of this latest release at: http:

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Turbine

Philosophical discussions are always worth a couple of cents of my own :-) On Wed, 23 May 2001, Tim Vernum wrote: > > From: Sam Ruby (23 May 2001 10:02 AM) > > > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > > > What is going on here? I fixed this code almost two days ago. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/bu

Struts 1.0-beta-3 Released

Struts 1.0-beta-3 is a release candidate version of the Struts Framework, likely to be the final beta prior to the Struts 1.0 Final Release, which is currently scheduled for June 15, 2001. Please help identify any remaining bugs that need to be fixed prior to final release, and report them to our

Re: Theft of authorship

On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > I am referring to otherwise honest people who choose to contribute > their enhancements back to the project. They create new classes but in > the process remove the names of previous authors. They do this in > good-faith as otherwise they

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

+1 (back at home recovering from J1). Craig On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote: > Was there a post with a [VOTE] header? > > +1 > > I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week. > > Jon Stevens wrote: > > > > Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project. > > > > 5 of 10 (n

Re: doinking around with a logo

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, bill parducci wrote: > "Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: > > > > bill parducci at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >> The little thinghie over the latter "a" is Copyright by Sun... > > > > > > it is LIKE it, but not the same. so i would disagree. > > > > I wouldn't want to eve

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > The common criteria that we use for any new project is to ask what the > > existing developer and user community is like. I know that there is a large > > user community, but what is the developer community like? > > BSF does not have a large devel

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.0 (Final) Released

As promised at JavaOne, the Struts project team is proud to announce the availability of Version 1.0 (final release) of the Struts Framework. The binary distribution is available at: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/release/v1.0/ and the source distribution is available at:

Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Jason van Zyl wrote: > [ ]Craig McClanahan Just getting back from vacation, I've read this thread and tend to agree with the general consensus that it belongs more on the xml.apache.org side of the house, for several reasons: * This particular implementation is written in

Three Commons Packages Released

The Jakarta Commons package is pleased to announce the availability of "Version 1.0" releases of three packages: * Beanutils - Generic manipulation of JavaBeans wrapped around the Java reflection APIs, including the ability to get and set nested and indexed properties. * Collections - A wide

jakarta-site2 process changes needed (heads up)

Heads up ... the old process for updating the Jakarta web site no longer works, since the CVS repositories are no longer present on daedalus. It's too late tonight, or I'd actually figure out how to update fix -- but wanted to warn anyone else who was going to try. The workaround is to use scp f

Struts install - error in SilverStream install doc (fwd)

Forwarding to STRUTS-DEV, where this kind of a report belongs. GENERAL is for discussion of Jakarta-wide project issues, not project-specific things like this. Craig McClanahan -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:25:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Armen Papshev <[EMAIL PROTEC

Enhancement to jakarta-site2 -- XSLT stylesheet equivalent to"site.vsl"

For those folks who like the idea of using a common stylesheet for generating documentation and web sites from XML input documents across multiple Jakarrta projects, but don't necessarily want to be tied to Anakia, you now have a choice. I've added an XSLT stylesheet (xdocs/stylesheets/site.xsl)

Re: Enhancement to jakarta-site2 -- XSLT stylesheet equivalent to"site.vsl"

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > on 7/27/01 12:08 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please help me debug this stylesheet, and improve its compatibility with > > site.vsl, by checking out the jakarta-site2 module and running

Re: Possible bug in web.xml

Thanks for the report - I just checked in patches that will be reflected in tonight's nightly build (and shortly on the web site as well). For project-specific documentation like this, it would be helpful to submit bug reports against the documentation for that project. Craig McClanahan On Mon

RE: Using mod_jk with apache 1.3.20

On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Gonyou, Austin wrote: > Thanks for the response, but I don't know if it answers the question. Let me > expount a bit and I'll see if it makes things clearer. > Could you *please* do your expounding on the correct mailing list? The GENERAL list is for issues about Jakarta

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:37:54 +0100 > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet > +1 Craig McClanah

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

I've set up the new top-level entry. Let me know what "components" and "versions" you would like set up, and I will do those as well. Craig On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:15:36 +0100 > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

Done. On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 19:38:09 +0100 > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PRO

Re: BCEL @ Jakarta

+1 Craig On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 11:37:25 -0400 > From: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: BCEL @ Jakarta > > Hi, > > Markus has just informed me that he has removed the GNU regexp depende

Re: Distributing the JSSE

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Peter Donald wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:21:46 +1000 > From: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 02:16, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > > Because the amount of p

Re: Integration

On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Frans Thamura wrote: > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 01:16:01 +0700 > From: Frans Thamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Integration > > Dear All, > > I see there is a lot of API in Apache... Jakarta and XM

Re: Distributing the JSSE

On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:30:56 +0100 > From: Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE > > Ainsi parlait Kasper Niel

RE: Cross site scripting

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:23:48 -0800 > From: Jeff Schnitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Cross site scripting > > > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[

RE: Cross site scripting

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Danny Angus wrote: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:51:55 - > From: Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Cross site scripting > > Craig wrote: > > That seems like a

Re: Cross site scripting

cesary if you do the getEscapedHtml() processing on everything? Craig On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:49:36 -0800 > From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PRO

RE: Using bzip2 for tarball

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Tim Vernum wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:30:47 +1100 > From: Tim Vernum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Using bzip2 for tarball > > From: Da

Re: Standardized jar manifest entries? (Re: How do you version jarfiles?)

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jeff Turner wrote: > > Java's official versioning spec [1] seems curiously irrelevant. It talks > about API specifications, and implementations thereof; not the sort of > scenario most people deal with. It's primary use-case seems to be > applets (it amuses me how Sun docum

[ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

The first Release Candidate for Tomcat 4.0 is now available. Only serious problems will be fixed between now and final release of Tomcat 4.0, which is currently scheduled for September 17, 2001. A second release candidate, if necessary, will be distributed on Thursday, September 13. Please down

Re: Comment for Apache.org

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > if you want things to change, then you need to do something about it (am i > sounding like jon? ;) if you were to answer newbie questions - to the best > of your ability - then jon wouldn't have to make time to answer them. > there's somethi

Re: Coding style addition

On 15 Dec 2001, Kevin A. Burton - burtonator wrote: > > Perhaps. > > It might be a good idea to have a default recommendation or a global standard. > > ... anyway... > The most entertaining flamewars I've ever seen are atempts to gain consensus on whether to use tabs or not, and then how many

Re: is a statement of the license in all source files?

On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: > am i right in thinking that for legal reasons we need to > include the complete license text in every source file (rather than just > the short form)? > My recollection is that you are correct ... we need to be using the long form, at least f

Re: Just the JARs

On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:54:30 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Just the JARs > > "Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote: > > Putting aside

Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 09:45:06 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage > > If everyone thinks the B

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > > >- Sam Ruby > > > >P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml > >and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot. > >Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we? > > +1 on t

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:27:52 -0500 > From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: More abuse of coding styles... > > Rule #1 from The Elements

  1   2   >