Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 09:59, Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel recompile?':
I think gcc version should not have impact on X because NVidia's drivers
are binary, closed source - they don't care about the gcc used to
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:48:11 +0300, Michel Merinoff wrote:
No, there's no way to make a pure binary driver that works on all
systems, because symbols in the kernel will be at different locations
depending on options it was compiled with.
Should this mean, that you have to recompile all
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 00:42 +, Duncan wrote:
FWIW, I handle my kernel stuff directly, downloading from kernel.org, not
thru portage. Thus, I care not one whit about Gentoo's kernel
stabilizing.
echo sys-kernel/vanilla-sources ~arch /etc/portage/package.keywords
emerge vanilla-sources
Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] skribis:
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 00:42 +, Duncan wrote:
FWIW, I handle my kernel stuff directly, downloading from kernel.org, not
thru portage. Thus, I care not one whit about Gentoo's kernel
stabilizing.
echo sys-kernel/vanilla-sources ~arch
I had the same problem with my computer. I bought early Athlon 64 3000+
on socket 754, mainboard Asus K8V. First I tried 4 different TwinMOS
memory modules (so that weren't no-names), but the system was very
unstable and memtest86+ showed memory errors. Fortunately I could take
Hynix memory
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 10:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I’ve found vanilla kernels to be much more reliable on my system than
Gentoo kernels (why I don’t know),
FYI: I have never had a problem with gentoo kernels. I have had
non-standard modules that would not compile, but updating the
