Brady Catherman wrote:
So the short of it is that higher is always better, and this is only a
'best as I personally' could do comparison.
OK, thanks for the clarification. Have you also run lmbench?
After our conversion things went together much smoother and now
maintenance is fairly
Simon - have you considered OCFS2 vs unionfs?
-Jared
On 4/11/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
If they're redistributed programs, we would very much appreciate
contribition of the ebuilds.
Sorry, contribution
Donnie
--
gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org
The project's site: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/ contains _WAY_ too
many acronyms and the name Oracle and Oracle-specific enhancements for Oracle
tools... Though this new version seems to be more broad for it's intended
use... Anyone has some experience with this?does it implement
Is it really?...it seems like it's a shared FS but there seems to be no way for
it to be a shared _root_ ...as I said, I see no ways or indications that one
can boot off of it.
Eric
Le Mardi 11 Avril 2006 21:55, Jared Greenwald a écrit :
I was thinking of unionfs incorrectly... OCFS2 is more
