Well, this is the problem. I like it too, and I too don't like the
current stituation. Currently genlop is abandonware. There is no
activity in Bugzilla, so that's why I post to gentoo-dev.
Portage Utilities Team, Hello ?
If we all like it that much, perhaps someone will want to take over it,
25.7.2005, 10:41:09, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
If we all like it that much, perhaps someone will want to take over it, make
a homepage ( or just set www.gentoo.org as the homepage ) and go through the
open bugs.
If not - it can be either dropped or left as it is currently. If no one
cares maybe
As the original handler of genlop (it was assigned to perl herd when it
first was asked to be added, since its written in perl) I strongly vote
against dropping the package (ok, I didn't even realize it had been
switched over to the portage-tools group for maintenance, and as such
that there were
Michael Cummings wrote:
As the original handler of genlop (it was assigned to perl herd when it
first was asked to be added, since its written in perl) I strongly vote
against dropping the package (ok, I didn't even realize it had been
switched over to the portage-tools group for maintenance, and
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just to make sure I am not missing something.
Does this cover the
- If you are upgrading from a version of udev prior to 046 ...
- If you are
Thanks, Alin.
This was the type of constructive response I was hoping to provoke.
Don't get me wrong - I like genlop, however software final state does
not exist IMO, and bugfixing is hugely important with any software.
Also, by dead upstream I mean that the page does not even exist
anymore, not
On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just to make sure I am not missing something.
Does this cover the
- If you are
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:45:29 +0300
Ivan Yosifov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Alin.
This was the type of constructive response I was hoping to provoke.
Don't get me wrong - I like genlop, however software final state
does
not exist IMO, and bugfixing is hugely important with any
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:53 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Just to make sure I am not missing
Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The funny thing about no more activity upstream is this: why would
there be? Except for bug fixes, it does a simple job, and it does it
damned well: it parses your emerge log and gives you just the output
you want and need. Don't abandon a tool just
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:26 +0300, Flammie Pirinen wrote:
Ooh, goodie. That's almost enough of us to form a *Finnish conspiration*
then!
Dream on ;)
Welcome.
Yeah, welcome to the team, Betelgeuse.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing
On Monday 25 July 2005 09:28 am, Graham Murray wrote:
Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The funny thing about no more activity upstream is this: why would
there be? Except for bug fixes, it does a simple job, and it does it
damned well: it parses your emerge log and gives you just
Hi all,
I have two new devs to introduce tonight...
I meant to send this out sooner, sorry.
Jan Kundrát (jkt) has come to join Gentoo to assist in documentation
translation. (This is jkt's first open source project)
I'm from Czech Republic, country in the middle of old Europe, and I'm
trying
13 matches
Mail list logo
