[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-java/sun-jre-bin: ChangeLog sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.03.ebuild sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.13.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 13:19 Thu 04 Oct , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote: 1.1 dev-java/sun-jre-bin/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.03.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/sun-jre-bin/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.03.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-java/sun-jdk: ChangeLog sun-jdk-1.4.2.16.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 14:25 Thu 04 Oct , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote: 1.1 dev-java/sun-jdk/sun-jdk-1.4.2.16.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/sun-jdk/sun-jdk-1.4.2.16.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-java/sun-jre-bin: ChangeLog sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.16.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 14:26 Thu 04 Oct , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote: 1.1 dev-java/sun-jre-bin/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.16.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/sun-jre-bin/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.16.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-portage/eix: ChangeLog eix-0.10.1.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 18:24 Thu 04 Oct , Stefan Schweizer (genstef) wrote: 1.1 app-portage/eix/eix-0.10.1.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-portage/eix/eix-0.10.1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Planning for the transition to EAPI=1 support

2007-10-05 Thread Duncan
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:26:50 +0200: [discussing GLEP-42/News] Problem is that nobody feels responsible for eselect anymore, so nobody takes care of bug #179064 (and I'm not going to play catchup games with externally

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: java-utils-2.eclass java-virtuals-2.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread Duncan
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:00:02 -0700: You can use a neat trick with a code block here, along these lines: { echo foo echo bar echo blah } file It avoids the possibility of a typo when you're

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: java-utils-2.eclass java-virtuals-2.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread Alistair Bush
Yes it is cool, and the eclass will be updated. Thank you dberkholz Duncan wrote: Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:00:02 -0700: You can use a neat trick with a code block here, along these lines: { echo foo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Planning for the transition to EAPI=1 support

2007-10-05 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 05 October 2007 04:26:50 Marius Mauch wrote: Problem is that nobody feels responsible for eselect anymore, so nobody takes care of bug #179064 (and I'm not going to play catchup games with externally hosted code). eselect isn't externally hosted. The code is available from svn at:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Planning for the transition to EAPI=1 support

2007-10-05 Thread Marius Mauch
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:01:56 +0200 Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 05 October 2007 04:26:50 Marius Mauch wrote: Problem is that nobody feels responsible for eselect anymore, so nobody takes care of bug #179064 (and I'm not going to play catchup games with externally

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/qt: ChangeLog qt-4.3.2.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Steve Long
Roy Marples wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:03 +0100, Steve Long wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: spec=$(echo ${CHOST} | cut -d- -f3) You can do this without resort to an external process: IFS=- read _ _ spec _ $CHOST unset IFS - or you can do: IFS=- arr=($CHOST) unset IFS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/qt: ChangeLog qt-4.3.2.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 13:34 Fri 05 Oct , Steve Long wrote: Roy Marples wrote: IFS=- set -- ${CHOST} spec=$2 Works fine in bash - and other shells. Yeah fine, there are kludgy workarounds; so what? Doesn't mean I want to use them. ;) In actual fact, I'd be more likely to use parameter expansion

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/sysstat: ChangeLog sysstat-8.0.1.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 13:52 Fri 05 Oct , Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote: 1.1 app-admin/sysstat/sysstat-8.0.1.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-admin/sysstat/sysstat-8.0.1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/drbd-kernel: drbd-kernel-0.7.24.ebuild drbd-kernel-8.0.6.ebuild metadata.xml ChangeLog Manifest

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 14:01 Fri 05 Oct , Christian Zoffoli (xmerlin) wrote: 1.1 sys-cluster/drbd-kernel/drbd-kernel-0.7.24.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/drbd-kernel/drbd-kernel-0.7.24.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/pvfs2: ChangeLog pvfs2-2.6.3.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 14:03 Fri 05 Oct , Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote: 1.1 sys-cluster/pvfs2/pvfs2-2.6.3.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/pvfs2/pvfs2-2.6.3.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gnustep-base.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:51 Fri 05 Oct , Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: 1.4 eclass/gnustep-base.eclass file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/gnustep-base.eclass?rev=1.4view=markup plain:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gnustep-base.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 05-10-2007 11:03:56 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: - echo '#!/usr/bin/env bash' ${T}/${cfile} - echo echo Applying ${P} default configuration ... ${T}/${cfile} + cat EOF ${T}/${cfile} +#!/usr/bin/env bash +gnustep_append_default() { + if [[ -z \$1 || -z \$2 || -z \$3 ]];

Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 20:42 Fri 05 Oct , Christian Faulhammer wrote: about 26 ebuilds have a PROVIDE=virtual/editor. Those could be transformed to a new-style virtual, which is really simple. According to zmedico and genone the impact of just commiting the virtual would be low. But I'd like to hear

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gnustep-base.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread George Shapovalov
Friday, 5. October 2007, Donnie Berkholz Ви написали: There's gotta be a better way of doing this. All those escapes really start to obfuscate the code. Anyone got a better idea? Just use single quotes? This should prevent bash expansion. Although, as I can see, this is done in here-function,

[gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-05 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, about 26 ebuilds have a PROVIDE=virtual/editor. Those could be transformed to a new-style virtual, which is really simple. According to zmedico and genone the impact of just commiting the virtual would be low. But I'd like to hear some comments on it. If noone objects I will commit it

Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-05 Thread Olivier Crête
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at all? Tester_ !rdep virtual/editor jeeves virtual/editor - app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron I think the answer is none that really should, I would favor just removing

Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-05 Thread Olivier Crête
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 20:27 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:46:29 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at all? The system set depends on it, and last I knew didn't allow for any-of deps.

Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-05 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:46:29 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at all? The system set depends on it, and last I knew didn't allow for any-of deps. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gnustep-base.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:03 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: There's gotta be a better way of doing this. All those escapes really start to obfuscate the code. Anyone got a better idea? Create a dir in eclasses to store proper files. Then just copy it from there. We store real patches in

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/drbd-kernel: drbd-kernel-0.7.24.ebuild drbd-kernel-8.0.6.ebuild metadata.xml ChangeLog Manifest

2007-10-05 Thread Christian Zoffoli
Donnie Berkholz ha scritto: [cut] Quote variables that can have spaces in them: D, S, T, WORKDIR, FILESDIR, DESTDIR, ROOT. Thanks, Donnie ops ...I've to patch my brain ;-) I've just commited changes. Christian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gnustep-base.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread Ryan Hill
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:51 Fri 05 Oct , Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: 1.4 eclass/gnustep-base.eclass file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/gnustep-base.eclass?rev=1.4view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/qt: ChangeLog qt-4.3.2.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Steve Long
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 13:34 Fri 05 Oct , Steve Long wrote: In actual fact, I'd be more likely to use parameter expansion than set, eg: spec=${CHOST#*-*-} # chop first two fields off so spec is fields 3 on spec=${spec%%-*} # chop all but first off so left with just field 3 ..which I

Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-05 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:18:11 -0400 Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see that both sudo and fcron, while they have some versions that depend on virtual/editor actually hardcode nano as the default. For the fcron dependency, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/149376#c15 and onward. Kind

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/qt: ChangeLog qt-4.3.2.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 00:41 Sat 06 Oct , Steve Long wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 13:34 Fri 05 Oct , Steve Long wrote: In actual fact, I'd be more likely to use parameter expansion than set, eg: spec=${CHOST#*-*-} # chop first two fields off so spec is fields 3 on spec=${spec%%-*} # chop all but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gnustep-base.eclass

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 17:31 Fri 05 Oct , Ryan Hill wrote: If there aren't any variables that you actually need expanded in the script (i didn't see any but could have easily missed it), just escape the termination marker, ie. cat \EOF ${T}/${cfile} or cat 'EOF' ${T}/${cfile} This turns

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/ziproxy: ChangeLog ziproxy-2.3.0.ebuild

2007-10-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 23:08 Fri 05 Oct , Stefan Briesenick (sbriesen) wrote: 1.1 net-proxy/ziproxy/ziproxy-2.3.0.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-proxy/ziproxy/ziproxy-2.3.0.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain: