Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11

2009-06-05 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Tiziano Müllerdev-z...@gentoo.org wrote: Default ACCEPT_LICENSE -- Goal: A possible default value for ACCEPT_LICENSE has been proposed. Decide whether that's ok. What happens to the X11 license files (one for each app)? The x11 team[1] came

Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal?

2009-06-05 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: kde-source.eclass and i am not sure but i think kde-base.eclass too kde-dist.eclass is used only by monolithic kde3 ebuilds that i plan to drop after 3.5.10 stabilization so it will be deprecated too On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Tobias Klausmann wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11

2009-06-05 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Rémi Cardonar...@gentoo.org wrote: My plan is to go over each package as time permits, check the license and then make the x-modular eclass set the default license to MIT instead of ${PN}. I could definitely use a hand to check all those packages :) Here's a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal?

2009-06-05 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petteri Räty wrote: Ulrich Mueller wrote: ... A quick scan shows that the following eclasses were deprecated more than three years ago, and are used by no ebuild in the tree: 2002-05-25 inherit.eclass 2003-12-11 kde-i18n.eclass