Re: [gentoo-dev] 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@

2010-11-14 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/10/10 4:16 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:14:28PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> If there are no objections, I will update the staffing needs page with >> info that we need more bug wranglers. >> > Please do. Thanks Here's the diff I'm going to apply: Index: i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Restabilizing MIPS

2010-11-14 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On 11/11/2010 05:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I'd like to begin stabilizing packages on MIPS. I've gotten acks from >> Redhatter, leio, and r0bertz, and Kumba doesn't really care. >> >> What's the best method to go about doing this?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: fat binaries

2010-11-14 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On 11/14/2010 05:41 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote: On 00:30 Mon 15 Nov , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Restabilizing MIPS

2010-11-14 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On 11/11/2010 05:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote: Hi, I'd like to begin stabilizing packages on MIPS. I've gotten acks from Redhatter, leio, and r0bertz, and Kumba doesn't really care. What's the best method to go about doing this? Stabilize the system packages, then remove ~mips from ACCEPT_KEYWORDS i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: fat binaries

2010-11-14 Thread Thomas Kahle
On 00:30 Mon 15 Nov , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: > > I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of > > fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary. > > Oh the heck are they implement

[gentoo-dev] Re: fat binaries

2010-11-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 11/15/2010 01:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary. Oh the heck are they implemented? If they a

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-11-14 23h59 UTC

2010-11-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-11-14 23h59 UTC. Removals: net-wireless/libeap 2010-11-08 17:42:50 alexxy dev-python/IcePy2010-11-08 19:13:48 arfrever Additions: dev-tex/floatflt

[gentoo-dev] Re: fat binaries

2010-11-14 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: > I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of > fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary. Oh the heck are they implemented? If they are FatELF, no they shouldn't be used, ever, full

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 111 bugs

2010-11-14 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sunday 14 November 2010 09:45:04 Alex Alexander wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:10:26PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > > On 11/14/10 1:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: > > > > If you have some spare time, please help assi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-14 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 14.11.2010 17:28, schrieb Sebastian Pipping: > > With Python, when you install a newer version if gets activated, leaving > your system in broken state. An update of Python always involves > running python-updater. If the user/admin has to run that anyway, why > should we take the call to ese

[gentoo-dev] fat binaries

2010-11-14 Thread Thomas Kahle
Hi, I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary. While I personally think it is not useful to gentoo users, one might still want to give the choice to build the fat binary. -) Are there other packages that can

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-tex/ha-prosper

2010-11-14 Thread Alexis Ballier
# Alexis Ballier (14 Nov 2010) # Last rites: dev-tex/ha-prosper # Old standalone ebuild, provided by dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra these days # Removal on 14 Dec 2010 dev-tex/ha-prosper

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Dropping Java support on ia64

2010-11-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Alistair Bush wrote: >> Any improvements to the text are welcome. > > I think the following could be written clearer.   Reading it made me have to > go off and check what week 50 was. > 52 weeks in a year, so, effectively "last two weeks of the year". -- ~Nirbhe

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Dropping Java support on ia64

2010-11-14 Thread Alistair Bush
> Any improvements to the text are welcome. I think the following could be written clearer. Reading it made me have to go off and check what week 50 was. "If there is no interest the removal of Java support well be done during week 50 of year 2010." why not say 'If there is no interest the r

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Dropping Java support on ia64

2010-11-14 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/14/10 8:36 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > The IA64 arch team does not have the resources to maintain Java support so we > agreed that support will be dropped unless more man power becomes available. Could you also add the info to ? Moreover,

[gentoo-dev] News item: Dropping Java support on ia64

2010-11-14 Thread Petteri Räty
Any improvements to the text are welcome. Regards, Petteri Title: Pending Removal of Java support in ia64 Author: Petteri Räty Author: IA64 Arch Team Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2010-11-14 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Keyword: ia64 Display-If-Installed: dev-java/java-config

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 111 bugs

2010-11-14 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sunday 14 November 2010 09:45:04 Alex Alexander wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:10:26PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > On 11/14/10 1:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: > > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > > > I have another great idea for you. People a

[gentoo-dev] Re: Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-14 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
+1 I totally agree with the conclusion. I believe that choice, "select the active version of Python", should not be implied by us, but taken by the user even if he explicitly asked for a new version to be installed. I've been in this situation before, and just because I wanted to try some new coo

[gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-14 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello, thanks for your interest. This thread is not about Python 3.x in particular, in case you wonder. In this mail - Typical GCC update (for comparison) - Python 2.7 update simulation (and how it fails) - The scenario - What happens - How it happens - Conclusion Typical

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: sys-apps/slocate

2010-11-14 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (14 Nov 2010) # No longer developed and replaced by sys-apps/mlocate # Bug 338380 # Removal in 30 days sys-apps/slocate

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 111 bugs

2010-11-14 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:10:26PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 11/14/10 1:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > I have another great idea for you. People are lazy, so could you make > the warning message include a direct li

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 111 bugs

2010-11-14 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/14/10 1:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. I have another great idea for you. People are lazy, so could you make the warning message include a direct link to the "Bug Wranglers" queue? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 111 bugs

2010-11-14 Thread Alex Alexander
Our bug queue has 111 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-14 Thread Markos Chandras
Patch applied but only for amd64 profile. @x86: feel free to adjust your profile too. -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 pgpSlGrsGoXJW.pgp Description: PGP signatur