On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/26/2011 12:52 AM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
Index: metadata.xml
===
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (27 Mar 2011)
# Last packages with hardcoded sys-apps/hal depend.
# Upstream has either stopped development, or it's too slow.
# Bugs 313425, 358935 and finally 313389.
# Removal in 30 days.
app-crypt/luks-tools
media-video/thoggen
sys-auth/pam_usb
libjpeg-turbo stabilization is happening for amd64/x86 at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/360715
- the gentoo-x86 has been converted to virtual/jpeg to support this.
- we have no bugs reported against the package.
- libjpeg-turbo is default in virtual/jpeg
so just heads up.
USE=hal is masked in base/use.mask, but unmasked for kde-base/solid
and app-cdr/k3b in base/package.use.mask pending on KDE 4.6.x stabilization.
This is preparation for dropping the uncompressed usb.ids file from
sys-apps/usbutils, which HAL relies on.
Also, both udisks and upower now have
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 01:17:46PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/26/2011 12:52 AM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
Index: metadata.xml
===
?xml
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 01:17:46PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
Can this practice of adding m-n packages to gentoo-x86 be stopped? If you
Our bug queue has 104 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click one of the following links:
http: http://bit.ly/bsHeJt
https: http://bit.ly/8Z4xUU
Thanks!
FEATURES=digest results in a scary warning and a possibly dangerous
re-generation of manifests at the beginning of every emerge:
* The FEATURES=digest setting can prevent corruption from being noticed.
* The `repoman manifest` command is the preferred way to generate
* manifests and it is
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
Is there any article that elaborate my question?
My aim is to explain, why Gentoo is much more agile then
any other binary distribution when hopping between arches.
Lets
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to
prevent overlapping features.
The result of this is that KDE and Gnome are now not installable at the
same time on a stable system.
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
I propose that we should be more aggressive about package.masking (for
removal) all maintainer-needed packages from the tree by doing that
one month after they become maintainer-needed. If someone doesn't
volunteer to take care of it, it probably wasn't important
On 03/27/2011 02:47 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Olexadarks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/26/2011 12:52 AM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
Index: metadata.xml
===
?xml version=1.0
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:47 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
If you prohibit people from doing that, they'll just commit it
normally, and then remove themselves a week later.
Why does anyone need to *add* a package that is
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:47 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On 03/26/2011 12:52 AM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
I propose that we should be more aggressive about package.masking (for
removal) all maintainer-needed packages from
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn schrieb:
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to
prevent overlapping features.
The result of this is that KDE and Gnome are now not installable at the
same time on a stable system.
Ah sorry, I was wrong. KDE
Am 27.03.2011 15:30, schrieb Jeremy Olexa:
The tree has 679 m-n packages.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml
If you cannot find someone else as a maintainer and someone is willing
to proxy me, I'd take dev-vcs/stgit: I use it on a daily basis (though
only to
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (27 Mar 2011)
# Orphaned library with bad habit of spreading around the system from
libtool's
# files. Not used by anything in tree. If you have problems after removal,
# look into using lafilefixer or revdep-rebuild.
# Removal in 30 days.
dev-libs/eggdbus
So I need one last hint, how to correct following correctly?
#if defined (HAVE64) !defined(AJ_MACOSXLF) !defined(AJ_HPUXLF)
!defined(AJ_FreeBSDLF) !defined(AJ_AIXLF)
struct dirent64 *dp;
#else
struct dirent *dp;
#endif
#if defined (HAVE64) !defined(AJ_MACOSXLF) !defined(AJ_HPUXLF)
hello friends,
i am syed armani and i am willing to participate in the gentoo development
process via GSOC-2011
i am a computer science student, 3rd year at DCE,NCR,INDIA
i want to work in Virtual Machine Builder (website or desktop client)project:
i have already tried its basic things..i
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:34 AM, justin wrote:
So I need one last hint, how to correct following correctly?
#if defined (HAVE64) !defined(AJ_MACOSXLF) !defined(AJ_HPUXLF)
!defined(AJ_FreeBSDLF) !defined(AJ_AIXLF)
struct dirent64 *dp;
#else
struct dirent *dp;
#endif
#if
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Armaan wrote:
i am syed armani and i am willing to participate in the gentoo development
process via GSOC-2011
i am a computer science student, 3rd year at DCE,NCR,INDIA
gentoo-...@gentoo.org is the mailing list for GSoC
-mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 27.3.2011 15:44, Rich Freeman napsal(a):
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:47 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On 03/26/2011 12:52 AM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
I propose that we should
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:05:20 +0530
Armaan dce3...@gmail.com wrote:
ABOUT ME:
i know about
[...]
I have a personality of a creative explorer, i always seek knowledge.
Then I suggest you take a guide on caps lock use.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:09:09 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 01:17:46PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
I propose that we should be more aggressive about package.masking (for
On 27/03/11 16:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:34 AM, justin wrote:
So I need one last hint, how to correct following correctly?
#if defined (HAVE64) !defined(AJ_MACOSXLF) !defined(AJ_HPUXLF)
!defined(AJ_FreeBSDLF) !defined(AJ_AIXLF)
struct dirent64 *dp;
#else
On Mar 27, 2011 11:01 AM, Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
And how exactly you want to track the level of failure for the package?
Since nobody is watching them already we usually don't know how much
they fail until somebody tries to emerge them from dev team or notify QA
by adding as
On 03/27/2011 09:08 AM, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
If you cannot find someone else as a maintainer and someone is willing
to proxy me, I'd take dev-vcs/stgit: I use it on a daily basis (though
% cvs di
Index: metadata.xml
===
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:47 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
If you prohibit people from doing that, they'll just commit it
normally, and then remove
On 03/04/2011 11:33 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Hello all, This email is to solicit concerns or thoughts about removing
the .lzma portage snapshots.
The facts:
- Starting on 2011-03-03, I enabled .xz compression on snapshots that
Gentoo makes available[1].
- On 2011-01-05, Mike added[2] .xz support
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Just start removing old[1] maintainer-needed packages. If people
complain, tell them to start maintaining it. If they continue to
complain,
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (27 Mar 2011)
# Last release in 2006, nobody looking after it.
# Pending removal on 2011-04-27
app-text/ssddiff
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (27 Mar 2011)
# Abandoned project of mine. Nothing really use it.
# Pending removal on 2011-04-27
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Just start removing old[1] maintainer-needed packages. If people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:30:16 -0500
Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
The tree has 679 m-n packages.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml
I want to proxy-maintain app-misc/pwsafe. It hasn't been updated in six
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
It's really simple:
(a) If the package has plenty of users, there should be no problems
finding a maintainer or a proxy-maintainer.
Uh, I guess that's why we are flooded with people wanting to be
devs... There are
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Christopher Head hea...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:30:16 -0500
Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
The tree has 679 m-n packages.
Am 27.03.2011 22:47, schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan:
--- metadata.xml 22 Mar 2009 02:35:03 - 1.5
+++ metadata.xml 27 Mar 2011 20:46:54 -
@@ -3,7 +3,13 @@
pkgmetadata
herdno-herd/herd
maintainer
-emailmaintainer-nee...@gentoo.org/email
+ nameChristopher
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Christopher Head hea...@gmail.com wrote:
--- metadata.xml 22 Mar 2009 02:35:03 - 1.5
+++ metadata.xml 27 Mar 2011 20:46:54 -
@@ -3,7 +3,13 @@
pkgmetadata
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
It's really simple:
(a) If the package has plenty of users, there should be no problems
finding a maintainer or a proxy-maintainer.
Uh, I guess
Le 27/03/2011 10:36, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to
prevent overlapping features.
Samuli,
I know you want to kill HAL with a vengeance. I don't disagree with the
ultimate goal but I think you've gone too far.
HAL and u{power,disks}
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sure, that's the history. But what made sense back then doesn't make
sense now. Back then we didn't have 600+ packages that no one
maintains, and
Am 27.03.2011 22:44, schrieb Rich Freeman:
We shouldn't be punishing people for not becoming developers. I don't
want to use a distro that throws up warning messages every few months
because some package I've been using had its developer retire, and I'm
a developer. If it breaks and I care
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:25 AM, David Abbott dabb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Christopher Head hea...@gmail.com wrote:
--- metadata.xml 22 Mar 2009 02:35:03 - 1.5
+++
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 27/03/2011 10:36, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to
prevent overlapping features.
I know you want to kill HAL with a vengeance. I don't disagree with the
ultimate goal but I
I had a question related to the amd64 minimal livecd.
I was not sure of the appropriate mailing list, so please forgive redirect
if this is the wrong one.
What exactly is happening at the Unpacking firmware stage of the boot
process?
Is there a way to find out exactly what firmware is being
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Colleen Josephson wrote:
I had a question related to the amd64 minimal livecd.
I was not sure of the appropriate mailing list, so please forgive redirect
if this is the wrong one.
you probably want the gentoo-catalyst mailing list
-mike
On 03/24/2011 04:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is especially important for the people doing arch keywording
since they make a ton of commits. i'm looking at you armin76.
One thing I don't get amidst this whole conversation is why I should
sign a Manifest file when committing KEYWORDS or
On 03/28/2011 12:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 27/03/2011 10:36, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to
prevent overlapping features.
I know you want to kill HAL with a vengeance. I
KDE really needs to step up and get KDE 4.6.x stabilization bug open,
and this non-issue would become moot ;-)
True, we'd also have a new stable KDE rather sooner than later. It's only
limited fun if upstream considers your stable version dead. :|
4.6.0 looked OK for a .0 release, some
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:55:14 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
The current problem is burnt-out or semi-active devs who commit
occasionally, but aren't able to help with any herd-related work
because they're out of touch. As such, their presence in the team
gives a false
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:04:56 -0500
Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
this is especially important for the people doing arch keywording
since they make a ton of commits. i'm looking at you armin76.
One thing I don't get amidst this whole conversation is why I should
sign a
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:12:10AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
3) Rely on an existing key list somewhere distributed in portage; the list
...
Cons: Mainly that the key id is a pretty short hash afaik.(Any
better-informed
people around?)
You can use the long-format key IDs if you want.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:12:10AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
3) Rely on an existing key list somewhere distributed in portage; the list
file with the key id's (not the keys themselves) is signed with a master key.
Is a mediocre and potentially insecure workaround.
Pros: you can exactly
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-03-27 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-im/silc-plugin 2011-03-21 15:07:36 signals
media-libs/libdjconsole 2011-03-22 18:18:36 ssuominen
On 02:39 Mon 28 Mar , Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Where did this come from? My entire argument was based around the fact
that unmaintained packages that may or may not be broken fundamentally
constitute a *bad* experience for the user. If we cannot guarantee
that bugs for a package will be
On 17:34 Sun 27 Mar , Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:55:14 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we launch gstats *today*, it'll take us at least a long time before
we get decent numbers, and even after that, those numbers will be
biased towards those people who
On 03/25/2011 14:30, Mike Frysinger wrote:
for people who dont have a key yet:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2chap=6
for people interested, bugs to get repoman extended to make the gpg
process smoother:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/360459
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (28 Mar 2011)
# Masked for QA.
# Not installable for almost an year now wrt bugs #326613,
# #284921, #315411, #316515. Other minor bugs, #336126.
# Removal in 30 days.
sci-libs/openfoam-kernel
sci-libs/openfoam-meta
sci-libs/openfoam-solvers
57 matches
Mail list logo
