Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach?

2013-10-06 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: I'd like to get your feedback and opinion about removing shared v8 library package from Gentoo. The three inside the box options require hope: 1. Use share lib. Hope upstream package devs code to whichever V8 API

Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach?

2013-10-06 Thread Richard Yao
On 09/23/2013 05:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-09-22, o godz. 17:17:53 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org napisał(a): I'd like maintainers of all packages depending on dev-lang/v8 to make their packages use bundled v8 copy instead (I can file bugs for that, let's discuss here

Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach?

2013-10-06 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/6/13 12:05 AM, Chris Stankevitz wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: I'd like to get your feedback and opinion about removing shared v8 library package from Gentoo. The three inside the box options require hope: 1. Use share lib.

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-10-06 23h59 UTC

2013-10-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2013-10-06 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-games/neoengine 2013-10-03 04:39:14 creffett dev-games/neotools 2013-10-03 13:37:49 creffett dev-python/pyme