Hi everyone,
we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original
bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days.
He is joining the arm team now and will stabilize mostly for arm64,
where he already started to work with a rate of 10 pkgs/day. Happy
days
On 7/14/14, 10:26 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original
bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days.
He is joining the arm team now and will stabilize mostly for arm64,
where he already started to work with a
Welcome back to the jungle! :)
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:26:17 +0200
Justin (jlec) j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original
bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days.
He is joining the arm team now
Welcome back! :)
On 07/14/2014 04:26 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
Hi everyone,
we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original
bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days.
He is joining the arm team now and will stabilize mostly for arm64,
I added the following entry to profiles/base/use.stable.mask:
# dev-lang/ruby:2.1 is not stable.
ruby_targets_ruby21
This is needed for https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505920, as
otherwise rexical would generate the following repoman error:
dependency.bad18
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov:
В письме от Пт, 11 июля 2014 16:24:38 пользователь hasufell написал:
However, basically having only a single person that actively does such
reviews + no official overlay makes it hard for contributors.
As I said previously, you (and any developer else) are free
Rich Freeman:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Rich, if I may have a suggestion, it would be that instead of meddling
with projects that have been doing their best with what they have for
years, and which need praise rather than hindrance, you instead
All,
this is a newsitem I want to post for the newest dhcpcd in the nesxt few
days.
I'm not interested in commenting out slaac private in the new
dhcpcd.conf by default, because as you will see in the references, there
are good reasons to keep that setting. However, what I would like to
know is
All,
I am reposting this because I got a couple of updates from IRC.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
William
Title: dhcpcd 6.4.2 defaults to stable private IPv6 addresses
Author: William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-07-17
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format:
All,
here is the second update from IRC today.
I reworded the title and added more information to the body recommending
that users adjust to the new configuration.
William
Title: dhcpcd = 6.4.2 changes defaults for IPv6
Author: William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted:
On 07/08/2014 07:11 PM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 08.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Michael Haubenwallner:
Hello fellow Portage developers,
attached portage patch draft aims to allow for easy distributing eclasses to
be tested by
multiple tinderboxes on various architectures, without being active
11 matches
Mail list logo
