Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On 01/04/2016 12:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > My understanding (which could be wrong) is that this update will break > things even if the user never runs eselect php afterwards. I can't > tell you the last time I touched the php eselect module, because major > updates to php are rare. > I

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Hi! > > > Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest as > advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual. Do you have any timeline in place for the change happening in tree

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] emerge: Add --autounmask-only parameter (bug 570672)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ta! After testing it a bit, I pushed it as 51f100e42753d6ffd3a24dfcb2ff8af0aa34966e. I hope to see more patches from you! :-] - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

Hi Sebastian, to be honest I was very upset when I first stumbled upon this problem. And yes I only found about it when my apache webserver started to deliver php source code instead of the real sites. Doing such a change without getting in contact with me as apache maintainer before the change

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Hi! >> >> >> Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest as >> advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual. > > Do you have any timeline in

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

Some packages list the same atom multiple times (e.g. behind diff USE flags). If one of them throws an error, we end up listing it more than once, and the output can get verbose/useless. --- pym/repoman/scanner.py | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[gentoo-dev] Change in Gentoo ZFS packaging policy

I have had ClusterHQ's partial stable ABI in Gentoo's packaging since December (which helped to shake out bugs) and have just done another update of it with various bug fixes, including many from HEAD. Some might notice that merging a pull request that isn't fully reviewed is a fairly big

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:30:30 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > Some packages list the same atom multiple times (e.g. behind diff USE > flags). If one of them throws an error, we end up listing it more > than once, and the output can get verbose/useless. > --- >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2016 09:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Hi! > > Such a change should really be avoided if possible. Would it be > possible to have a conditional approach where either one can be

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:45:37 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote: > to be honest I was very upset when I first stumbled upon this problem. > And yes I only found about it when my apache webserver started to > deliver php source code instead of the real sites. > Doing such a change

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2016 02:30 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/04/2016 09:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >>> Hi! > > > > >> Such a change should really be avoided if possible. Would it be

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

On 01/04/2016 01:30 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > + # Filter out > duplicates. We do this by hand (rather > + # than use a > set) so the order is stable and better > +

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On 01/04/2016 08:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Therefore, I think you should really work on some kind of backwards > compatibility for people using '-D PHP5' that would prevent those kind > of issues at least for some migration period. With big fat warnings for > people who run it. > I wasn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/4/2016 3:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Hi! > > >> Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest >> as advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual. > > Do you have

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

Michael Orlitzky wrote: > If anyone has a concrete idea that works better, it's not too late to > change it. Add code to init script and service file to check the config before starting the program, and react if PHP5 is still set. //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass assisted multilib dependent cache updates

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:54:31 +0100 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Hello all, > > while working on bug #518422, I found out that while eclass calls the > relevant cache updates it has no idea whether or not it is called in a > multilib context or not. Hmm... what's the problem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > Maybe I'm thinking things too difficult, why not just define both -D > PHP and -D PHP5 in the transition period and suggest this config for > any change? Because it mostly just defers the problem. If the desire is to move away from PHP5 then I would suggest to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > And while at it, in additional to news item, this should likely follow > a few version upgrades as elog messages before actually being > implemented anywhere > I don't want to be too prescriptive with the

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 01:26:28 +0100 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest as > advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual. afaics this only affects users using the mod_php variant of PHP and not any fcgid or fpm solution.

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> If anyone has a concrete idea that works better, it's not too late to > >> change it. > > > > Add code to init script and service file to check the config before > > starting the program, and react if PHP5 is still set. > > Which init script? For Apache. > It's

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/4/2016 11:43 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/04/2016 11:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> >> So pkg_postinst for >=eselect-php-0.8.1 should say something, >> but ideally also the invocation - but I don't know if eselect-php >> is also code or

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Brian Evans wrote: > > On 1/4/2016 11:43 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 01/04/2016 11:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >>> >>> So pkg_postinst for >=eselect-php-0.8.1 should say something, >>> but ideally also the invocation - but I don't know if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass assisted multilib dependent cache updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/01/16 10:54 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Hello all, > > while working on bug #518422, I found out that while eclass calls > the relevant cache updates it has no idea whether or not it is > called in a multilib context or not. > > Imho,

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On 01/04/2016 11:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > So pkg_postinst for >=eselect-php-0.8.1 should say something, but > ideally also the invocation - but I don't know if eselect-php is also > code or only data managed by eselect? The pkg_postinst is already there. The eselect-php routines are bash

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

On 01/04/2016 12:11 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > >> Without updating APACHE2_OPTS, websites could end up serving >> PHP code (include configuration files with passwords) >> unprocessed to website visitors! > > That would mean there is an additional (local) security problem. > All PHP