Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > >> > >> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' > > > > This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly =

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:20:26 -0700 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. > wrote: > > > > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is > > debate on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500 > Gordon Pettey wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen > > wrote: > > > > > While the PMS perhaps hasn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is debate > on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug request and > makes it invalid. Despite the need still existing, and PMS

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] emerge: add --autounmask-keep-keywords option (bug 622480)

Zac Medico posted on Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:27:53 -0700 as excerpted: > On 08/13/2017 07:00 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> Interesting .. I'm sure I shied away from that option for some reason >> ... wonder if zmedico can shed some light on the difference between the >> new options and the old, apart

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > Title: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula-9.0.3 > Author: Thomas Beierlein > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2017-08-14 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: > Until now Bacula

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500 Gordon Pettey wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen > wrote: > > > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's > > still a good effort with some success. I would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:09:15 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > I am sure > > that portage developers gnash their teeth at blockers stemming from > > PMS, but I wholeheartedly believe that Gentoo, PMS and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:42 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > I cannot explain why those who do portage development are not the PMS > authors. > Have you considered asking them? -- Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:42:21 + Peter Stuge wrote: > Alexander Berntsen wrote: > > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's > > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to > > see the proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Rewrite doins in python (bug 624526)

On 08/14/2017 12:49 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 14/08/17 08:39, Zac Medico wrote: >> From: Hidehiko Abe >> >> doins is written in bash. However, specifically in case that >> too many files are installed, it is very slow. >> This CL rewrites the script in python for

[gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

Bacula ebuilds uses some weird USE flags with mostly negative logic ('do not build ..') coming from their build system. With the actual major release (bacula-9.0.3) we should try to switch to something more sane. I picked up the new flags from app-backup/bareos as both ebuilds have a common

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Rewrite doins in python (bug 624526)

On 14/08/17 08:39, Zac Medico wrote: > From: Hidehiko Abe > > doins is written in bash. However, specifically in case that > too many files are installed, it is very slow. > This CL rewrites the script in python for performance. > > BUG=chromium:712659 > TEST=time

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > I am sure > that portage developers gnash their teeth at blockers stemming from > PMS, but I wholeheartedly believe that Gentoo, PMS and Portage are > all better off for it. > Honestly, I've yet to see any portage developers

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

Alexander Berntsen wrote: > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's still a > good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to see the > proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo. As far as technical documentation about how ebuilds work (the core of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisions for USE flag changes

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 12:12:39 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 08/13/2017 12:06 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > There is a down side you didn't talk about -- more work for the arch > > teams and for us in terms of stabilizations. > > > > When we revbump, a new revision

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisions for USE flag changes

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:50:14 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > We have a pull request for the devmanual that will update the revision > documentation; namely, when to create a new one: > > https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org/pull/67 > > The comments bring up an

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs: sci-geosciences/gmapcatcher dev-util/webstorm Best regards, Amy Liffey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Revisions for USE flag changes

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:05:58PM +1000, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 08/12/2017 08:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> On 08/12/2017 03:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> > >>> Please provide some examples of recent

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Rewrite doins in python (bug 624526)

From: Hidehiko Abe doins is written in bash. However, specifically in case that too many files are installed, it is very slow. This CL rewrites the script in python for performance. BUG=chromium:712659 TEST=time (./setup_board --forace && \ ./build_package --withdev

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-vcs/cvs* (post CVS project disband)

Hi, Due to the CVS project being disbanded [1], the following packages are up for grabs: dev-vcs/cvs dev-vcs/cvs2cl dev-vcs/cvsd dev-vcs/cvsgraph dev-vcs/cvsq dev-vcs/cvsutils A few notes to warn you though: - CVS is effectively dead upstream, and carries a lot of patches, - dev-vcs/cvs has