Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-23 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24:24PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new xserver > versions, and then I have to do the leg work to fix them, make the > upstream releases, and then push them into Gentoo. Again, for between > zero and one person to use.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-23 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:52:59 + Richard Bradfield wrote: > I guess I should put my hand up and admit to being "the one user" for > this driver. I've got an ancient netbook with an Intel GMA3600, for > which there is no accelerated Xorg driver, which means I'm stuck with >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-23 Thread Richard Bradfield
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24:24PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new xserver versions, and then I have to do the leg work to fix them, make the upstream releases, and then push them into Gentoo. Again, for between zero and one person to use. ...

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-23 Thread Matt Turner
Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new xserver versions, and then I have to do the leg work to fix them, make the upstream releases, and then push them into Gentoo. Again, for between zero and one person to use. I left some other ancient ones that are also candidates for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v5]

2017-11-23 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration > the points made during the Council pre-review. > > ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst > HTML:

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/aimsniff

2017-11-23 Thread Jonas Stein
# Jonas Stein (23 Nov 2017) # Depends on the AIM service which will be discontinued on 2017-12-15. # See also bug #638564. Masked for removal on 2017-12-20 net-analyzer/aimsniff -- Best regards, Jonas Stein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Martin Vaeth wrote: > > 1. Doing a full clean build [..] the speed of make or ninja is hugely > > offset by the compilation speed, and their overhead is negligible. > > It depends on the definition of negligible. For huge projects like > boost or chromium it is several minutes It's arguably a